R. v. Anablak (P.), [2008] Nunavut Cases Uned. 9 (CJ)
| Jurisdiction | Nunavut |
| Judge | Kilpatrick, J. |
| Court | Nunavut Court of Justice (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | CRIMINAL LAW |
| Citation | [2008] Nunavut Cases Uned. 9 (CJ),[2008] Nunavut Cases Uned. 9,2008 NUCJ 9 |
| Date | 28 February 2008 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
R. v. Etuangat (L.), (2009) 457 A.R. 172 (CA)
...refd to. [para. 13]. R. v. Louison (W.C.) (2008), 310 Sask.R. 217; 423 W.A.C. 217; 2008 SKCA 69, refd to. [para. 13]. R. v. Anablak, 2008 NUCJ 9, refd to. [para. R. v. Ammaklak, 2008 NUCJ 27, refd to. [para. 13]. R. v. Pudlat (J.G.) (2005), 404 A.R. 389; 394 W.A.C. 389; 2005 NUCA 3, refd to......
-
R. v. Klimovich (E.), [2013] O.T.C. Uned. 2888 (SC)
...He cited three cases in support for that proposition: R. v. Warwick , 2006 ONCJ 518, R. v. Bridle , 2007 BCSC 1302, and R. v. Anablack , 2008 NUCJ 9. In Warwick , the trial judge imposed a 12 year sentence on a joint submission. He noted that the applicable range of sentence in cases of man......
-
R. v. MULLEN, 2017 SKQB 237
...held that denunciation of the offence and the offender’s high moral blameworthiness mandated a sentence of nine years; 10. R v Anablak, 2008 NUCJ 9 – the offender had a criminal history of assaulting the victim and breaching court orders to stay away from her. He also had a serious alcohol ......
-
R. v. Jamieson (D.B.), 2012 ONSC 1114
...higher in the 9 to 15 year range. (See for example R. v.Bridle, [2007] BCSC 1302. R v Warwick , [2006] ONCJ 518, 2. R v. Anablak, 2008 NUCJ 9). However, each case is dependent on the circumstances of the offender and the circumstances of the offence in each case. There are cases above and b......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
R. v. Etuangat (L.), (2009) 457 A.R. 172 (CA)
...refd to. [para. 13]. R. v. Louison (W.C.) (2008), 310 Sask.R. 217; 423 W.A.C. 217; 2008 SKCA 69, refd to. [para. 13]. R. v. Anablak, 2008 NUCJ 9, refd to. [para. R. v. Ammaklak, 2008 NUCJ 27, refd to. [para. 13]. R. v. Pudlat (J.G.) (2005), 404 A.R. 389; 394 W.A.C. 389; 2005 NUCA 3, refd to......
-
R. v. Klimovich (E.), [2013] O.T.C. Uned. 2888 (SC)
...He cited three cases in support for that proposition: R. v. Warwick , 2006 ONCJ 518, R. v. Bridle , 2007 BCSC 1302, and R. v. Anablack , 2008 NUCJ 9. In Warwick , the trial judge imposed a 12 year sentence on a joint submission. He noted that the applicable range of sentence in cases of man......
-
R. v. MULLEN, 2017 SKQB 237
...held that denunciation of the offence and the offender’s high moral blameworthiness mandated a sentence of nine years; 10. R v Anablak, 2008 NUCJ 9 – the offender had a criminal history of assaulting the victim and breaching court orders to stay away from her. He also had a serious alcohol ......
-
R. v. Peter (P.), [2014] Nunavut Cases Uned. 28
...this is by a sober or intoxicated person. Sub-paragraph B is deterrence. I will come back to B. But looking at R v Anablak, 2008 NUCJ 09, 2008 NUCJ 9 (CanLII) [Anablak], at paragraph 22, the Court says, and I quote, The primary focus of this sentencing must be denunciation and deterrence. B......
Request a trial to view additional results