R. v. Anderson,
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Pepall, van Rensburg and Brown JJ.A. |
| Neutral Citation | 2020 ONCA 780 |
| Citation | 2020 ONCA 780 |
| Docket Number | C65857 & C67034 |
| Date | 29 December 2020 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
R v Perswain,
...by the trial judge . . . were reasonably open to him” (at para 67). (See also R v McIvor, 2021 MBCA 55 at paras 33-37; R v Anderson, 2020 ONCA 780 at paras 24-31; R v Ponace, 2019 MBCA 99 at paras 17-19; and R v Fedyk, 2018 MBCA 74 at para 25, aff’d 2019 SCC [10] The accused argues that the......
-
R. v. Okojie,
...available at the railyard. The Decision in Anderson; Cumberbatch [89] In R. v. Anderson; Cumberbatch, 2020 ONCA 780; leave to appeal refused 2021 CarswellOnt. 7082, CBSA officers intercepted a package addressed to Harley Eckert at an address in St. Cathar......
-
R. v. Edwards,
...possibilities must also be applied to the evidence or the absence of evidence: see Villaroman, at para. 37; R. v. Anderson, 2020 ONCA 780, at para. 24. For example, in this case, some of the circumstantial evidence, such as the backpack allegedly belonging to the appellant, was challen......
3 cases
-
R v Perswain,
...by the trial judge . . . were reasonably open to him” (at para 67). (See also R v McIvor, 2021 MBCA 55 at paras 33-37; R v Anderson, 2020 ONCA 780 at paras 24-31; R v Ponace, 2019 MBCA 99 at paras 17-19; and R v Fedyk, 2018 MBCA 74 at para 25, aff’d 2019 SCC [10] The accused argues that the......
-
R. v. Okojie,
...available at the railyard. The Decision in Anderson; Cumberbatch [89] In R. v. Anderson; Cumberbatch, 2020 ONCA 780; leave to appeal refused 2021 CarswellOnt. 7082, CBSA officers intercepted a package addressed to Harley Eckert at an address in St. Cathar......
-
R. v. Edwards,
...possibilities must also be applied to the evidence or the absence of evidence: see Villaroman, at para. 37; R. v. Anderson, 2020 ONCA 780, at para. 24. For example, in this case, some of the circumstantial evidence, such as the backpack allegedly belonging to the appellant, was challen......