R. v. Anwar, 2020 ONCJ 103

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeJustice A. T. McKay
Citation2020 ONCJ 103
Date21 February 2020
CourtOntario Court of Justice General Division (Canada)
Docket NumberLondon 18-5872; Kitchener 19-236
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
10 practice notes
  • Post-Bedford: Judicial Variance in Applying Canada's New Sex Work Regime.
    • Canada
    • Queen's Law Journal Vol. 47 No. 2, March 2022
    • March 22, 2022
    ...at para 84. (199.) See ibid at paras 86-99. (200.) Supra note 174 at para 74. (201.) See supra note 167 at para 41. (202.) See R v Anwar, 2020 ONCJ 103 at para (203.) See ibid at paras 128-32. (204.) See Criminal Code, supra note 4. (205.) See e.g. R v Charboneau, 2019 ABQB 882; R v Joseph,......
  • R. v. N.S.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • March 4, 2021
    ...of Canada v. Bedford and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, (Technical Paper), (Ottawa: DOJ, 2014). [11] R. v. Anwar, 2020 ONCJ 103. [12] “Will Say” Statement of Chris Atchison, at para. 4. [13] Bruckert & Law, supra, note 1 at 83-89. [14] 2015 SCC 15, [2015] 1 S.C.R. 773. ......
  • R. v. N.S.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • February 24, 2022
    ...and 286.4 of the Criminal Code. She was acquitted in 2020 after McKay J. found the provisions to be unconstitutional: R. v. Anwar, 2020 ONCJ 103, 62 C.R. (7th) 402. Although they were represented by different counsel, these interveners delivered a joint factum and Mr. Lockyer and Mr. Rosenb......
  • R. v. Joseph,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • November 19, 2020
    ...at para. 146, Conlan J. expressed the view that using “the simplest language possible”, “harbour” means “to shelter”. In R. v. Anwar, 2020 ONCJ 103, 62 C.R. (7th) 402, at para. 127, McKay J. said that harbour means “to give shelter or refuge”. There is, therefore, controversy about the ordi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
  • R. v. N.S.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • March 4, 2021
    ...of Canada v. Bedford and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, (Technical Paper), (Ottawa: DOJ, 2014). [11] R. v. Anwar, 2020 ONCJ 103. [12] “Will Say” Statement of Chris Atchison, at para. 4. [13] Bruckert & Law, supra, note 1 at 83-89. [14] 2015 SCC 15, [2015] 1 S.C.R. 773. ......
  • R. v. N.S.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • February 24, 2022
    ...and 286.4 of the Criminal Code. She was acquitted in 2020 after McKay J. found the provisions to be unconstitutional: R. v. Anwar, 2020 ONCJ 103, 62 C.R. (7th) 402. Although they were represented by different counsel, these interveners delivered a joint factum and Mr. Lockyer and Mr. Rosenb......
  • R. v. Joseph,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • November 19, 2020
    ...at para. 146, Conlan J. expressed the view that using “the simplest language possible”, “harbour” means “to shelter”. In R. v. Anwar, 2020 ONCJ 103, 62 C.R. (7th) 402, at para. 127, McKay J. said that harbour means “to give shelter or refuge”. There is, therefore, controversy about the ordi......
  • R. v. MacDonald,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • June 21, 2021
    ...The hypotheticals in Mr. MacDonald’s application are largely based on the hypothetical scenarios considered in N.S. and R. v. Anwar, 2020 ONCJ 103, 454 C.R.R. (2d) 52, with some further additions. Here, I will only consider other issues raised, but not included, within the same hypothetical......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT