R. v. Arcangioli (G.), (1994) 162 N.R. 280 (SCC)

JudgeCory, McLachlin, Iacobucci and Major, JJ.
CourtSupreme Court of Canada
Case DateThursday January 27, 1994
JurisdictionCanada (Federal)
Citations(1994), 162 N.R. 280 (SCC);1994 CanLII 107 (SCC);22 WCB (2d) 144;69 OAC 26;27 CR (4th) 1;[1994] 1 SCR 129;162 NR 280;[1994] SCJ No 5 (QL);[1994] ACS no 5;111 DLR (4th) 48;87 CCC (3d) 289;JE 94-241

R. v. Arcangioli (G.) (1994), 162 N.R. 280 (SCC)

MLB headnote and full text

[French language version follows English language version]

[La version française vient à la suite de la version anglaise]

....................

Giuseppe Arcangioli (appellant) v. Her Majesty The Queen (respondent)

(23380)

Indexed As: R. v. Arcangioli (G.)

Supreme Court of Canada

Lamer, C.J.C., Sopinka, Gonthier,

Cory, McLachlin, Iacobucci and

Major, JJ.

January 27, 1994.

Summary:

The accused was convicted of aggravated assault following a jury trial and was sen­tenced to four years' imprisonment. The accused appealed against conviction.

The Ontario Court of Appeal, Galligan, J.A., dissenting, dismissed the appeal. The accused appealed.

The Supreme Court of Canada allowed the appeal and ordered a new trial.

Criminal Law - Topic 4393

Procedure - Jury charge - Failure of counsel to object - Effect of - The Supreme Court of Canada stated that "trial counsel's failure to object to a jury charge is not determinative of the applicability of the Criminal Code's 'curative provision', s. 618(1)(b)(iii)" - See paragraph 38.

Criminal Law - Topic 5035

Appeals - Indictable offences - Dismissal of appeal if error resulted in no miscar­riage of justice - General - [See Criminal Law - Topic 4393].

Criminal Law - Topic 5211

Evidence - Witnesses - Admissibility and relevancy - Flight of accused - An accused convicted of aggravated assault (stabbing) admitted common assault, but claimed a third party stabbed the victim - The accused fled the scene - The Supreme Court of Canada stated that it was not sufficient to instruct the jury that innocent men sometimes flee the crime scene - The trial judge should have directed the jury that the accused's flight was equally con­sistent with common assault as with ag­gravated assault - Fleeing the scene was, accordingly, incapable of supporting an inference of consciousness of guilt re­specting the aggravated assault charge - There was a danger that the jury could wrongly infer that the accused fled because he was guilty of stabbing the victim - See paragraph 49.

Criminal Law - Topic 5214.8

Evidence - Witnesses - Admissibility and relevancy - That crime committed by another - An accused charged with aggra­vated assault (stabbing) claimed that a third person did it - The accused adduced evidence (criminal record) that the third person had a propensity for violence and was connected with another stabbing one-half hour before the present stabbing - The Supreme Court of Canada stated that the trial judge should have instructed the jury that they could consider the evidence in support of the accused's claim that the third person, not the accused, committed the stabbing - See paragraph 48.

Criminal Law - Topic 5316.1

Evidence - Witnesses - Inferences - Of guilt - From fleeing crime scene - [See Criminal Law - Topic 5211].

Criminal Law - Topic 5419

Evidence - Witnesses - Criminal record - [See Criminal Law - Topic 5214.8].

Criminal Law - Topic 5419.1

Evidence - Witnesses - Character evi­dence respecting - The Supreme Court of Canada stated that the Crown was pre­cluded from adducing evidence of the accused's character unless the accused has put character in issue or the evidence is otherwise relevant (e.g. similar acts) - The evidence "is excluded on the ground that its prejudicial effect is apt to outweigh its probative value; the danger exists that a jury may convict on the basis of the ac­cused's reputation rather than on the basis of the evidence" - The court stated that the rule did not apply to character evi­dence respecting a third party witness - As long as it was relevant and not otherwise excluded by a rule of evidence, it was admissible - "Courts are reluctant to exclude evidence offered by an accused in his defence" - See paragraphs 25 to 31.

Criminal Law - Topic 5449

Evidence - Witnesses - Testimony re­specting the accused - Character of accused - [See Criminal Law - Topic 5419.1].

Cases Noticed:

R. v. Scopelliti (1981), 63 C.C.C.(2d) 481 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 27].

R. v. McMillan (1975), 23 C.C.C.(2d) 160 (C.A.), affd. [1977] 2 S.C.R. 824; 15 N.R. 20, refd to. [para. 27].

R. v. Williams (1985), 7 O.A.C. 201; 18 C.C.C.(3d) 356 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 28].

R. v. Yaeck (1991), 50 O.A.C. 29; 68 C.C.C.(3d) 545 (C.A.), leave to appeal refused, [1992] 1 S.C.R. xii; 139 N.R. 240; 56 O.A.C. 160, refd to. [para. 29].

R. v. Seaboyer and Gayme, [1991] 2 S.C.R. 577; 128 N.R. 81; 48 O.A.C. 81; 66 C.C.C.(3d) 321, refd to. [para. 30].

R. v. Kendall and McKay (1987), 20 O.A.C. 134; 35 C.C.C.(3d) 105 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 31].

R. v. Squire, [1977] 2 S.C.R. 13; 10 N.R. 25, refd to. [para. 37].

MacAskill v. R., [1931] S.C.R. 330, refd to. [para. 37].

R. v. Chambers (No. 2), [1990] 2 S.C.R. 1293; 119 N.R. 321; 59 C.C.C.(3d) 321, refd to. [para. 38].

R. v. Gudmondson (1933), 60 C.C.C. 332 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 40].

United States v. Myers (1977), 550 F.2d 1036 (5th Cir.), refd to. [para. 42].

Colpitts v. R., [1965] S.C.R. 739, refd to. [para. 46].

R. v. Wildman, [1984] 2 S.C.R. 311; 5 O.A.C. 241; 55 N.R. 27, refd to. [para. 46].

R. v. P.L.S., [1991] 1 S.C.R. 909; 122 N.R. 321; 90 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 234; 280 A.P.R. 234; 5 C.R.(4th) 351; 64 C.C.C.(3d) 193, refd to. [para. 46].

R. v. Broyles, [1991] 3 S.C.R. 595; 131 N.R. 118; 120 A.R. 189; 8 W.A.C. 189; 8 C.R.R.(2d) 274; [1992] 1 W.W.R. 289; 9 C.R.(4th) 1; 84 Alta. L.R.(2d) 1; 68 C.C.C.(3d) 308, refd to. [para. 46].

R. v. F.F.B., [1993] 1 S.C.R. 697; 148 N.R. 161; 120 N.S.R.(2d) 1; 332 A.P.R. 1, refd to. [para. 46].

R. v. Bevan and Griffith, [1993] 2 S.C.R. 599; 154 N.R. 245; 64 O.A.C. 165, refd to. [para. 46].

Statutes Noticed:

Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, sect. 686(1)(b)(iii) [para. 24].

Authors and Works Noticed:

McCormick on Evidence (Revsd. Ed. 1972), p. 655 [para. 42].

McCormick on Evidence (4th Ed. 1992), vol. 1, p. 811 [para. 26]; vol. 2, p. 182 [para. 39].

Sopinka, J., Lederman, S.N., and Bryant, A.W., The Law of Evidence in Canada (1992), p. 454 [para. 26].

Wigmore on Evidence (3rd Ed. 1940), vol. 1, p. 573 [para. 27].

Counsel:

Clayton C. Ruby, for the appellant;

Jamie C. Klukach, for the respondent.

Solicitors of Record:

Ruby & Edwardh, Toronto, Ontario, for the appellant;

Attorney General for Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, for the respondent.

This appeal was heard on November 12, 1993, before Lamer, C.J.C., Sopinka, Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin, Iacobucci and Major, JJ., of the Supreme Court of Canada.

On January 27, 1994, Major, J., delivered the following judgment for the Supreme Court of Canada in both official languages.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
650 practice notes
  • R. v. Douglas (R.D.), (2005) 387 A.R. 1 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • February 28, 2005
    ...(1988), 21 O.A.C. 257; 36 C.C.C.(3d) 225; 1987 CarswellOnt 1116 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 221, footnote 65]. R. v. Arcangioli (G.), [1994] 1 S.C.R. 129; 162 N.R. 280; 69 O.A.C. 26; 87 C.C.C.(3d) 289; 27 C.R.(4th) 1; 1994 CarswellOnt 1151, refd to. [para. 229, footnote 66]. R. v. White (R.G.) ......
  • Reference Re Firearms Act (Can.), 2000 SCC 31
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court of Canada
    • June 15, 2000
    ...or authorization that is refused by the Registrar; (c) every transfer of a firearm of which the Registrar is informed under section 26 or 27; (d) every exportation from or importation into Canada of a firearm of which the Registrar is informed under section 42 or 50; (e) every loss, finding......
  • R. v. Bonisteel (R.), (2008) 259 B.C.A.C. 114 (CA)
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • September 9, 2008
    ...v. Scopelliti (1981), 63 C.C.C.(2d) 481 at 493 (Ont. C.A.); Morris v. The Queen , [1983] 2 S.C.R. 190 at 201, 202; R. v. Arcangioli , [1994] 1 S.C.R. 129 at 138-139; R. v. Sims (1994), 87 C.C.C.(3d) 402 at 421 (B.C.C.A.). "Evidence of extrinsic misconduct by an accused, of which so-called s......
  • R. v. White (D.R.), (2011) 300 B.C.A.C. 165 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court of Canada
    • March 11, 2011
    ...more likely than the proposition would be in the absence of that evidence'" - See paragraph 36. Cases Noticed: R. v. Arcangioli (G.), [1994] 1 S.C.R. 129; 162 N.R. 280 ; 69 O.A.C. 26 , dist. [paras. 6, 109, 153]. R. v. White (R.G.) and Côté (Y.), [1998] 2 S.C.R. 72 ; 227 N.R. 326 ; 112......
  • Get Started for Free
596 cases
  • Lindahl Estate et al. v. Olsen et al., (2004) 360 A.R. 310 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • February 22, 1997
    ...complainer [see footnote 141]. [231] Grant Lindahl at the de bene esse examination in cross said he had suffered from hemorrhoids since age 26 or 27. He had testified at discovery that he had suffered them from about age 20. He would seek medical attention for ailments depending on how seri......
  • R. v. Yumnu (I.) et al.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • February 1, 2010
    ...to. [para. 250]. R. v. Peavoy (D.M.) (1997), 101 O.A.C. 304; 117 C.C.C.(3d) 226 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 252]. R. v. Arcangioli (G.), [1994] 1 S.C.R. 129; 162 N.R. 280; 69 O.A.C. 26, refd to. [para. 254]. R. v. White (R.G.) and Côté (Y.), [1998] 2 S.C.R. 72; 227 N.R. 326; 112 O.A.C. 1, refd ......
  • R. v. Abdullahi,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • July 14, 2023
    ...[2009] 1 S.C.R. 423; R. v. G.D.B., 2000 SCC 22, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 520; R. v. Barton, 2019 SCC 33, [2019] 2 S.C.R. 579; R. v. Arcangioli, [1994] 1 S.C.R. 129; R. v. Terezakis, 2007 BCCA 384, 223 C.C.C. (3d) 344; R. v. Williams, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 1128. By Côté J. (dissenting)  ......
  • R. v. Trochym (S.), (2004) 188 O.A.C. 330 (CA)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • July 5, 2004
    ...385, refd to. [para. 14]. R. v. S.C.B. (1997), 104 O.A.C. 81; 119 C.C.C.(3d) 530 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 16]. R. v. Arcangioli (G.), [1994] 1 S.C.R. 129; 162 N.R. 280; 69 O.A.C. 26; 87 C.C.C.(3d) 289, refd to. [para. 19]. R. v. Levert (G.) (2001), 150 O.A.C. 208; 159 C.C.C.(3d) 71 (C.A.), r......
  • Get Started for Free
4 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (April 27 ' May 1)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 12, 2020
    ...1 S.C.R. 314, R. v. Lavallee, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 852, R. v. S.A.B., 2003 SCC 60, R. v. White, [1998] 2 S.C.R. 72, R. v. Arcangioli, [1994] 1 S.C.R. 129, R. v. Gager, 2012 ONSC 2712, R. v. Chiasson, 2009 ONCA 789, R. v. Jeanvenne, 2010 ONCA 706, R. v. Dixon, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 244, R. v. McNeil, 2......
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 10 – 14, 2018)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • December 20, 2018
    ...Conduct, Probative Value, Identity, Fresh Evidence, Judicial Discretion, Criminal Code, s. 686(1)(a)(iii), R. v. Arcangioli, [1994] 1 S.C.R. 129, R. v. S.B.1, 2018 ONCA 807, R. v. Hall, 2010 ONCA 724, R. v. O'Connor (2002), 62 O.R. (3d) 263 (C.A.), Browne v. Dunn (1893), 6 R. 87 (H.L.), R. ......
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (October 8 – 12, 2018)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • October 16, 2018
    ...678, R v Vorobiov, 2018 ONCA 448, R v Angelis, 2013 ONCA 70, R v Chambers, 2016 ONCA 684, R v White, [1998] 2 SCR 72, R v Arcangioli, [1994] 1 SCR 129, R v White, 2011 SCC 13, R v Aravena, 2015 ONCA 250, leave to appeal refused, [2015] SCCA No 497, R v Khan, 2007 ONCA 779, R v Handy, 2002 S......
  • Bill 57 And Amendments To The Construction Act
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • December 25, 2018
    ...before October 1, 2019, when adjudication comes into force, if an owner, contractor or subcontractor refuses to make payment under section 26 or 27 of the Act, the contractor or subcontractor to whom payment is owed may refuse to pay out its subcontractor or sub-subcontractor (as the case m......
48 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive The Law of Evidence. Seventh Edition
    • August 29, 2015
    ...535 R. v. Arbour (1990), 4 C.R.R. (2d) 369, [1990] O.J. No. 1353 (C.A.) ................. 392 R. v. Arcangioli, [1994] 1 S.C.R. 129, 27 C.R. (4th) 1, 87 C.C.C. (3d) 289 ....................................................................... 101, 162, 575 R. v. Archambault (2012), 307 C.C.C.......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Criminal Appeals: A Practitioner's Handbook
    • May 2, 2017
    ...91 ʨraya, R v , 2015 ONCA 854 .................................................. 86 ʨrcangioli, R v , [1994] 1 SCR 129 .............................................. 42 ʩailey, R v , 2016 ONCA 516 .................................................. 39 ʩalafrej c R , 2005 QCCA 18, 197 CCC (3d......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive The Law of Evidence. Revised Fifth Edition
    • September 2, 2008
    ...O.J. No. 1353 (C.A.) ..................................................................................... 361 R. v. Arcangioli, [1994] 1 S.C.R. 129, 27 C.R. (4th) 1, 87 C.C.C. (3d) 28 9, 69 O.A.C. 26, 111 D.L.R. (4th) 48, 162 N.R. 280 .................................. 93, 151 R. v. Arcuri......
  • Character Evidence: Primary Materiality
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Evidence. Eighth Edition
    • June 25, 2020
    ...And see R v Yaeck (1991), 6 OR (3d) 293 (CA). 263 R v Pilon , 2009 ONCA 248. See also Jackson , above note 262. 264 R v Arcangioli , [1994] 1 SCR 129; Pollock , above note 245 at paras 100–1. 265 R v Khan (2004), 189 CCC (3d) 49 (Ont SCJ). THE L AW OF EVIDENCE 116 used by the jury to infer ......
  • Get Started for Free
2 provisions
  • First Nations Elections Act (S.C. 2014, c. 5)
    • Canada
    • Canada Gazette July 17, 2014
    • Invalid date
    ...is guilty of an offence who contravenes(a) section 10; or(b) section 12, paragraph 14(a), (c) or (e), 16(c), (e) or (f) or 20(d) or section 26 or 27.Marginal note:Offences  — subsections 13(2) and 21(2)(3) Every person who intentionally contravenes subsection 13(2) or 21(2) is guilty of an ......
  • An Act to amend the Statistics Act (S.C. 2017, c. 31)
    • Canada
    • Canada Gazette March 08, 2018
    • Invalid date
    ...charge or within their jurisdiction.Marginal note:Records28 Every person who is required to transmit any information mentioned in section 26 or 27 shall from day to day make and keep entries and records of the particulars used to respond to requests for information made to them.Marginal not......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT