R. v. Archambault,
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | Wagner, Richard; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Côté, Suzanne; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah; Kasirer, Nicholas; Jamal, Mahmud; O’Bonsawin, Michelle; Moreau, Mary |
| Docket Number | 40428 |
| Date | 01 November 2024 |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2024 SCC 35 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
8 practice notes
-
R v Archambault,
...de la défense de Montréal-Laval-Longueuil, Criminal Lawyers' Association (Ontario) and Canadian Civil Liberties Association Interveners 2024 SCC 35 Present: Wagner C.J. and Karakatsanis, Côté, Rowe, Martin, Kasirer, Jamal, O'Bonsawin and Moreau JJ. DOCKET: 40428 SUPREME COURT OF CANADA Crim......
-
Yat Sun Food Products Ltd v. Griffith Foods International Inc, 2025 FC 1688
...deals with matters before the Registrar of Trademarks. [37] Relying on the recent Supreme Court of Canada decision in R v Archambault, 2024 SCC 35 [Archambault], Yat Sun’s counsel argued that the new subsection 56(5), on its face, cannot have been intended to be retroactive and that Yat Sun......
-
2025 BCSC 514,
...action. 132 The Commissioner's submissions relied on the dissent of Justice Karakatsanis (though not on this point) in R. v. Archambault, 2024 SCC 35. She held that, for retrospective punishment to apply, there must be a new rule that interferes with a substantive legal interest that vested......
-
Gulzar Transport Inc. v Office of the BC Container Trucking Commissioner,
...action. 132 The Commissioner's submissions relied on the dissent of Justice Karakatsanis (though not on this point) in R. v. Archambault, 2024 SCC 35. She held that, for retrospective punishment to apply, there must be a new rule that interferes with a substantive legal interest that vested......
Get Started for Free
8 cases
-
R v Archambault,
...de la défense de Montréal-Laval-Longueuil, Criminal Lawyers' Association (Ontario) and Canadian Civil Liberties Association Interveners 2024 SCC 35 Present: Wagner C.J. and Karakatsanis, Côté, Rowe, Martin, Kasirer, Jamal, O'Bonsawin and Moreau JJ. DOCKET: 40428 SUPREME COURT OF CANADA Crim......
-
Yat Sun Food Products Ltd v. Griffith Foods International Inc, 2025 FC 1688
...deals with matters before the Registrar of Trademarks. [37] Relying on the recent Supreme Court of Canada decision in R v Archambault, 2024 SCC 35 [Archambault], Yat Sun’s counsel argued that the new subsection 56(5), on its face, cannot have been intended to be retroactive and that Yat Sun......
-
2025 BCSC 514,
...action. 132 The Commissioner's submissions relied on the dissent of Justice Karakatsanis (though not on this point) in R. v. Archambault, 2024 SCC 35. She held that, for retrospective punishment to apply, there must be a new rule that interferes with a substantive legal interest that vested......
-
Gulzar Transport Inc. v Office of the BC Container Trucking Commissioner,
...action. 132 The Commissioner's submissions relied on the dissent of Justice Karakatsanis (though not on this point) in R. v. Archambault, 2024 SCC 35. She held that, for retrospective punishment to apply, there must be a new rule that interferes with a substantive legal interest that vested......
Get Started for Free