R. v. Arp
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Judge | Lamer, Antonio; L'Heureux-Dubé, Claire; Gonthier, Charles Doherty; Cory, Peter deCarteret; McLachlin, Beverley; Iacobucci, Frank; Major, John C.; Bastarache, Michel; Binnie, William Ian Corneil |
| Citation | [1998] 3 SCR 339,20 CR (5th) 1,129 CCC (3d) 321,186 WAC 1,AZ-98111103,1998 CanLII 769 (SCC),[1999] 5 WWR 545,114 BCAC 1,[1998] SCJ No 82 (QL),232 NR 317,JE 98-2397,[1998] ACS no 82,58 BCLR (3d) 18,166 DLR (4th) 296,[1998] CarswellBC 2545,40 WCB (2d) 196 |
| Date | 26 November 1998 |
| Docket Number | 26100 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
720 practice notes
-
R. v. Ticknovich (N.M.), (2003) 343 A.R. 243 (QB)
...1; 190 D.L.R.(4th) 591; [2000] 11 W.W.R. 1; 2000 CarswellMan 449; 2000 SCC 40, appld. [para. 30, footnote 24]. R. v. Arp (B.), [1998] 3 S.C.R. 339; 232 N.R. 317; 114 B.C.A.C. 1; 186 W.A.C. 1; 166 D.L.R.(4th) 296; 129 C.C.C.(3d) 321; 20 C.R.(5th) 1; [1999] 5 W.W.R. 545; 58 B.C.L.R.(3d) 18; 1......
-
R. v. Trang (D.) et al., (2002) 329 A.R. 241 (QB)
...4, 52]. R. v. Egger (J.H.), [1993] 2 S.C.R. 451; 153 N.R. 272; 141 A.R. 81; 46 W.A.C. 81, refd to. [paras. 4, 49, 61]. R. v. Arp (B.), [1998] 3 S.C.R. 339; 232 N.R. 317; 114 B.C.A.C. 1; 186 W.A.C. 1, refd to. [paras. 4, 49]. Boudreault v. Barrett et al. (1995), 174 A.R. 71; 102 W.A.C. 71 (C......
-
R. v. J.E.D., (2002) 325 A.R. 305 (QB)
...to appeal refused (2000), 266 N.R. 397; 213 Sask.R. 220; 260 W.A.C. 220 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 240, footnote 40]. R. v. Arp (B.), [1998] 3 S.C.R. 339; 232 N.R. 317; 114 B.C.A.C. 1; 186 W.A.C. 1; 166 D.L.R.(4th) 296; 129 C.C.C.(3d) 321; [1999] 5 W.W.R. 545; 20 C.R.(5th) 1, refd to. [para.......
-
R. v. Khelawon (R.)
...R. v. Shearing (I.) (2002), 290 N.R. 225; 168 B.C.A.C. 161; 275 W.A.C. 161; 165 C.C.C.(3d) 225, consd. [para. 49]. R. v. Arp (B.), [1998] 3 S.C.R. 339; 232 N.R. 317; 114 B.C.A.C. 1; 186 W.A.C. 1; 129 C.C.C.(3d) 323, refd to. [para. 49]. R. v. Paul (A.) (2002), 166 O.A.C. 330; 170 C.C.C.(3d)......
Get Started for Free
626 cases
-
R. v. Ticknovich (N.M.), (2003) 343 A.R. 243 (QB)
...1; 190 D.L.R.(4th) 591; [2000] 11 W.W.R. 1; 2000 CarswellMan 449; 2000 SCC 40, appld. [para. 30, footnote 24]. R. v. Arp (B.), [1998] 3 S.C.R. 339; 232 N.R. 317; 114 B.C.A.C. 1; 186 W.A.C. 1; 166 D.L.R.(4th) 296; 129 C.C.C.(3d) 321; 20 C.R.(5th) 1; [1999] 5 W.W.R. 545; 58 B.C.L.R.(3d) 18; 1......
-
R. v. Trang (D.) et al., (2002) 329 A.R. 241 (QB)
...4, 52]. R. v. Egger (J.H.), [1993] 2 S.C.R. 451; 153 N.R. 272; 141 A.R. 81; 46 W.A.C. 81, refd to. [paras. 4, 49, 61]. R. v. Arp (B.), [1998] 3 S.C.R. 339; 232 N.R. 317; 114 B.C.A.C. 1; 186 W.A.C. 1, refd to. [paras. 4, 49]. Boudreault v. Barrett et al. (1995), 174 A.R. 71; 102 W.A.C. 71 (C......
-
R. v. J.E.D., (2002) 325 A.R. 305 (QB)
...to appeal refused (2000), 266 N.R. 397; 213 Sask.R. 220; 260 W.A.C. 220 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 240, footnote 40]. R. v. Arp (B.), [1998] 3 S.C.R. 339; 232 N.R. 317; 114 B.C.A.C. 1; 186 W.A.C. 1; 166 D.L.R.(4th) 296; 129 C.C.C.(3d) 321; [1999] 5 W.W.R. 545; 20 C.R.(5th) 1, refd to. [para.......
-
R. v. Khelawon (R.)
...R. v. Shearing (I.) (2002), 290 N.R. 225; 168 B.C.A.C. 161; 275 W.A.C. 161; 165 C.C.C.(3d) 225, consd. [para. 49]. R. v. Arp (B.), [1998] 3 S.C.R. 339; 232 N.R. 317; 114 B.C.A.C. 1; 186 W.A.C. 1; 129 C.C.C.(3d) 323, refd to. [para. 49]. R. v. Paul (A.) (2002), 166 O.A.C. 330; 170 C.C.C.(3d)......
Get Started for Free
3 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (November 11 November 15, 2019)
...v. T.B.L. (2003), 173 O.A.C. 159 (C.A.), R. v. Graham, 2015 ONCA 113, R. v. Simpson (1977), 35 C.C.C. (2d) 337 (Ont. C.A.), R. v. Arp, [1998] 3 S.C.R. 339, R. v. J.A.T., 2012 ONCA 177, R. v. B.(L.) (1997), 35 O.R. (3d) 35 (C.A.), R. v. McNeice, 2019 ONCA 836, R. v. Wilson, 2013 ONCA 222 R. ......
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (February 4 8, 2019)
...the respondent Keywords: Criminal Law, First Degree Murder, Manslaughter, Evidence, Admissibility, Similar Fact Evidence, R. v. Arp, [1998] 3 S.C.R. 339, R. v. Woodcock (2003), 177 C.C.C. (3d) 346 (Ont. C.A.), R. v. MacCormack, 2009 ONCA 72, Severance, Criminal Code, s. 591(3)(a), R. v. Jea......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (January 20 January 24, 2020)
...Detention R. v. S.H., 2020 ONCA 34 Keywords: Criminal Law, Sexual Assault, Criminal Code, s. 686(1)(b)(iii), s. 276, R. v. Arp, [1998] 3 S.C.R. 339, R. v. Mahalingan, 2008 SCC 63, R v. D.C., 2019 ONCA 442, R. v. Bartholomew, 2019 ONCA 377, R. v. M.B., 2011 ONCA 76, R. v. L.L., 2009 ONCA 413......
91 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...75, 79 R. v. Amway Corp., [1989] 1 S.C.R. 21, 56 D.L.R. (4th) 309 .............................. 288 R. v. Arp, [1998] 3 S.C.R. 339, 166 D.L.R. (4th) 296 .......................................... 281 R. v. Askov, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 1199, 59 C.C.C. (3d) 449 ................................. 28......
-
Table of cases
...............................522 Armstrong , R v , 2003 CanLII 29258, 179 CCC (3d) 37 (Ont CA) .......................278 Arp , R v , [1998] 3 SCR 339 ....... 217, 218, 264, 280, 284, 285, 286, 298, 300, 301, 371, 614 Arsenault v R , 2016 NBCA 47 ........................... 617, 620, 621, 62......
-
Procedural Fairness as a Principle of Fundamental Justice
...see Hamish Stewart, Sexual Offences in Canadian Law , loose-leaf (Aurora, ON: Canada Law Book, 2004) at §8:400. 115 See also R v Arp , [1998] 3 SCR 339 at paras 68–75, holding that the similar fact rule in its present common-law form does not offend the principles of fundamental justice, an......
-
Table of Cases
...76, 79, 202 R v Amway Corp, [1989] 1 SCR 21, 56 DLR (4th) 309 ...................................... 307 R v Arp, [1998] 3 SCR 339, 166 DLR (4th) 296 ................................................... 301 R v Askov, [1990] 2 SCR 1199, 59 CCC (3d) 449 .............................................
Get Started for Free