R. v. Atagootak (M.), [2003] A.R. Uned. 876
Jurisdiction | Nunavut |
Judge | Fraser, C.J.A., Wittmann and Costigan, JJ.A. |
Court | Nunavut Court of Appeal (Canada) |
Subject Matter | CRIMINAL LAW |
Citation | [2003] A.R. Uned. 876,2003 NUCA 3,[2003] A.R. Uned. 876 (NUCA) |
Date | 17 September 2003 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
1 practice notes
-
R v Barton,
...to date has almost unanimously applied a subjective test of intention to cause harm. Three exceptions were listed as Welch, R v Atagootak, 2003 NUCA 3, and R v Vandermeulen, 2013 MBQB 118. The latter two cases adopted the statement in Welch (at para 87) that “the victim cannot consen......
1 cases
-
R v Barton,
...to date has almost unanimously applied a subjective test of intention to cause harm. Three exceptions were listed as Welch, R v Atagootak, 2003 NUCA 3, and R v Vandermeulen, 2013 MBQB 118. The latter two cases adopted the statement in Welch (at para 87) that “the victim cannot consen......