R. v. Atagootak (M.), [2003] A.R. Uned. 876

JudgeFraser, C.J.A., Wittmann and Costigan, JJ.A.
CourtNunavut Court of Appeal (Canada)
Case DateSeptember 17, 2003
JurisdictionNunavut
Citations[2003] A.R. Uned. 876;2003 NUCA 3;[2003] A.R. Uned. 876 (NUCA)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
1 practice notes
  • R v Barton,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • December 11, 2020
    ...to date has almost unanimously applied a subjective test of intention to cause harm. Three exceptions were listed as Welch, R v Atagootak, 2003 NUCA 3, and R v Vandermeulen, 2013 MBQB 118. The latter two cases adopted the statement in Welch (at para 87) that “the victim cannot consen......
1 cases
  • R v Barton,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • December 11, 2020
    ...to date has almost unanimously applied a subjective test of intention to cause harm. Three exceptions were listed as Welch, R v Atagootak, 2003 NUCA 3, and R v Vandermeulen, 2013 MBQB 118. The latter two cases adopted the statement in Welch (at para 87) that “the victim cannot consen......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT