R. v. Atzenberger, 2018 BCCA 296
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Judge | The Honourable Madam Justice Newbury,The Honourable Madam Justice MacKenzie,The Honourable Mr. Justice Harris |
| Citation | 2018 BCCA 296 |
| Docket Number | CA44222 |
| Date | 27 July 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 practice notes
-
Licence to Khill: What Appellate Decisions Reveal About Canada's New Self-Defence Law.
...966 ; R v McPhee, 2018 ONCA 1016 ; R v Francis, supra note 25; R v Leroux, 2018 BCSC 1429 ; R v Dario, 2018 BCCA 85 ; R v Atzenberger, 2018 BCCA 296; R v Whiteley, 2017 ONCA 804 ; R v Jerrett, 2017 ABCA 43 ; R v Rasberry, 2017 ABCA 135 ; R v Kraljevic, 2016 ONCA 860 ; R v Mustard, 2......
-
R v Bear,
...96; R v Joanisse (1995), 85 OAC 186 at paras 81–82 (Ont CA), leave to appeal to SCC refused, [1997] 1 SCR viii; R v Atzenberger, 2018 BCCA 296 at para [62] In my respectful view, Mr. Bear’s argument regarding ineffect......
-
R v Wolfe,
...(R v Joanisse (1995), 102 CCC (3d) 35 at para 62 (Ont CA), leave to appeal to SCC refused, [1997] 1 SCR viii; R v Atzenberger, 2018 BCCA 296 at para 66). The question of whether the actions of counsel can be seen as having compromised the fairness of the trial process or the reliability of ......
-
R v Robertson, 2020 SKCA 8
...R v Araya, 2015 SCC 11 at para 39, [2015] 1 SCR 581; R v Alexander, 2015 BCCA 484 at para 110, 330 CCC (3d) 417; R v Atzenberger, 2018 BCCA 296 at para [62] At the end of the day, the question is whether an appellate court is satisfied that the jurors would have adequately understood the is......
Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
-
R v Bear,
...96; R v Joanisse (1995), 85 OAC 186 at paras 81–82 (Ont CA), leave to appeal to SCC refused, [1997] 1 SCR viii; R v Atzenberger, 2018 BCCA 296 at para [62] In my respectful view, Mr. Bear’s argument regarding ineffect......
-
R v Wolfe,
...(R v Joanisse (1995), 102 CCC (3d) 35 at para 62 (Ont CA), leave to appeal to SCC refused, [1997] 1 SCR viii; R v Atzenberger, 2018 BCCA 296 at para 66). The question of whether the actions of counsel can be seen as having compromised the fairness of the trial process or the reliability of ......
-
R v Robertson, 2020 SKCA 8
...R v Araya, 2015 SCC 11 at para 39, [2015] 1 SCR 581; R v Alexander, 2015 BCCA 484 at para 110, 330 CCC (3d) 417; R v Atzenberger, 2018 BCCA 296 at para [62] At the end of the day, the question is whether an appellate court is satisfied that the jurors would have adequately understood the is......
-
EVANGELOS TSIAPLAS v. R.,
...appeal court owes deference to the decision of the trial judge to appoint counsel to cross‑examine a witness. See R v Atzenberger, 2018 BCCA 296 at para 50, where the Court [50] This Court owes deference to the judge’s decision to appoint counsel to cross‑exa......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Licence to Khill: What Appellate Decisions Reveal About Canada's New Self-Defence Law.
...966 ; R v McPhee, 2018 ONCA 1016 ; R v Francis, supra note 25; R v Leroux, 2018 BCSC 1429 ; R v Dario, 2018 BCCA 85 ; R v Atzenberger, 2018 BCCA 296; R v Whiteley, 2017 ONCA 804 ; R v Jerrett, 2017 ABCA 43 ; R v Rasberry, 2017 ABCA 135 ; R v Kraljevic, 2016 ONCA 860 ; R v Mustard, 2......