R. v. Bacsa (A.)
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Judge | Molloy, J. |
| Citation | [2010] O.T.C. Uned. 271,[2010] O.T.C. Uned. 271 (SC),2010 ONSC 271 |
| Date | 14 January 2010 |
| Subject Matter | NARCOTIC CONTROL,INCOME TAX,CRIMINAL LAW,PRACTICE |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 practice notes
-
Table of Cases
...156 Baron v Canada, [1993] 1 SCR 416 ....................................................... 29, 47, 64, 68 Basca v Canada (AG), 2010 ONSC 271 ............................................................... 372 Bergeron v Deschamps, [1978] 1 SCR 243 ...............................................
-
Third-Party Relief from Forfeiture Orders
...an applicant has an “interest in property” it is incumbent upon the applicant to prove the amount of the claim: see Basca v Canada (AG) , 2010 ONSC 271 at paras 8–18. An applicant’s interest in property does not need to be an interest of ownership or possession, but it can be: see 170888 Ca......
-
R. v. Morvai (L.)
...same time as two other applications, one by 1431633 Ontario Inc (Rona Building Centre) and another by Antoniu Bacsa (2010 ONSC 266 and 2010 ONSC 271, respectively). Those two applications are the subject of separate reasons issued by me at the same time as this decision. I have dealt with t......
-
R. v. 1431633 Ont.
...My particular findings with respect to the Bacsa and Morvai claims are set out in separate decisions issued at the same time as this one (2010 ONSC 271 and 2010 ONSC 279, respectively). B. NATURE OF RONA'S CLAIM [4] Rona supplied building materials, which were delivered to the property wher......
2 cases
-
R. v. Morvai (L.)
...same time as two other applications, one by 1431633 Ontario Inc (Rona Building Centre) and another by Antoniu Bacsa (2010 ONSC 266 and 2010 ONSC 271, respectively). Those two applications are the subject of separate reasons issued by me at the same time as this decision. I have dealt with t......
-
R. v. 1431633 Ont.
...My particular findings with respect to the Bacsa and Morvai claims are set out in separate decisions issued at the same time as this one (2010 ONSC 271 and 2010 ONSC 279, respectively). B. NATURE OF RONA'S CLAIM [4] Rona supplied building materials, which were delivered to the property wher......
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...156 Baron v Canada, [1993] 1 SCR 416 ....................................................... 29, 47, 64, 68 Basca v Canada (AG), 2010 ONSC 271 ............................................................... 372 Bergeron v Deschamps, [1978] 1 SCR 243 ...............................................
-
Third-Party Relief from Forfeiture Orders
...an applicant has an “interest in property” it is incumbent upon the applicant to prove the amount of the claim: see Basca v Canada (AG) , 2010 ONSC 271 at paras 8–18. An applicant’s interest in property does not need to be an interest of ownership or possession, but it can be: see 170888 Ca......