R v Baldovi et al, 2018 MBCA 64

JurisdictionManitoba
JudgeChief Justice Richard J. Chartier,Madam Justice Diana M. Cameron,Madam Justice Jennifer A. Pfuetzner
Citation2018 MBCA 64
Date07 June 2018
CourtCourt of Appeal (Manitoba)
Docket NumberAR17-30-08813
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
4 practice notes
  • Jans Estate v Jans, 2020 SKCA 61
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • May 13, 2020
    ...Drugs Ltd. v Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 284 DLR (4th) 756 [Rando] (leave to appeal to the SCC refused, 2008 CanLII 2286), and R v Baldovi, 2018 MBCA 64, 363 CCC (3d) 224 [Baldovi] (leave to appeal to the SCC refused, 2019 CanLII 3756, 2019 CanLII 3747 and 2019 CanLII 3744). In Rando, the trial j......
  • R v Banayos and Banayos, 2018 MBCA 86
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • September 13, 2018
    ...of bias in respect of the judge who granted the first six wiretap authorizations, was dismissed earlier this year (see R v Baldovi et al, 2018 MBCA 64). [3] The accused had also raised a number of issues relating to conviction and sentence. This appeal deals with those issues. [4] The broth......
  • CIBC v Ahmed, 2021 MBCA 25
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • March 23, 2021
    ...informed of the relevant circumstances (see Berscheid v Federated Co-operatives et al, 2018 MBCA 27 at paras 28-30; and R v Baldovi et al, 2018 MBCA 64 at paras 12-15). [6] In support of her position regarding recusal, the defendant refers to comments made by the motion judge, in an effort ......
  • R. v. Swanson, 2022 MBQB 138
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • June 30, 2022
    ...is no dispute as to the test for a finding of reasonable apprehension of bias.  Manitoba Court of Appeal noted in R. v. Baldovi, 2018 MBCA 64, [13]   Actual bias is not alleged in this case. Rather, the allegation relates to a reasonable apprehension of bias. While the test f......
4 cases
  • Jans Estate v Jans, 2020 SKCA 61
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • May 13, 2020
    ...Drugs Ltd. v Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 284 DLR (4th) 756 [Rando] (leave to appeal to the SCC refused, 2008 CanLII 2286), and R v Baldovi, 2018 MBCA 64, 363 CCC (3d) 224 [Baldovi] (leave to appeal to the SCC refused, 2019 CanLII 3756, 2019 CanLII 3747 and 2019 CanLII 3744). In Rando, the trial j......
  • R v Banayos and Banayos, 2018 MBCA 86
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • September 13, 2018
    ...of bias in respect of the judge who granted the first six wiretap authorizations, was dismissed earlier this year (see R v Baldovi et al, 2018 MBCA 64). [3] The accused had also raised a number of issues relating to conviction and sentence. This appeal deals with those issues. [4] The broth......
  • CIBC v Ahmed, 2021 MBCA 25
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • March 23, 2021
    ...informed of the relevant circumstances (see Berscheid v Federated Co-operatives et al, 2018 MBCA 27 at paras 28-30; and R v Baldovi et al, 2018 MBCA 64 at paras 12-15). [6] In support of her position regarding recusal, the defendant refers to comments made by the motion judge, in an effort ......
  • R. v. Swanson, 2022 MBQB 138
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • June 30, 2022
    ...is no dispute as to the test for a finding of reasonable apprehension of bias.  Manitoba Court of Appeal noted in R. v. Baldovi, 2018 MBCA 64, [13]   Actual bias is not alleged in this case. Rather, the allegation relates to a reasonable apprehension of bias. While the test f......