R v Baldovi et al, 2018 MBCA 64
Jurisdiction | Manitoba |
Judge | Chief Justice Richard J. Chartier,Madam Justice Diana M. Cameron,Madam Justice Jennifer A. Pfuetzner |
Citation | 2018 MBCA 64 |
Date | 07 June 2018 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Manitoba) |
Docket Number | AR17-30-08813 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Start Your 7-day Trial
4 practice notes
-
Jans Estate v Jans, 2020 SKCA 61
...Drugs Ltd. v Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 284 DLR (4th) 756 [Rando] (leave to appeal to the SCC refused, 2008 CanLII 2286), and R v Baldovi, 2018 MBCA 64, 363 CCC (3d) 224 [Baldovi] (leave to appeal to the SCC refused, 2019 CanLII 3756, 2019 CanLII 3747 and 2019 CanLII 3744). In Rando, the trial j......
-
R v Banayos and Banayos, 2018 MBCA 86
...of bias in respect of the judge who granted the first six wiretap authorizations, was dismissed earlier this year (see R v Baldovi et al, 2018 MBCA 64). [3] The accused had also raised a number of issues relating to conviction and sentence. This appeal deals with those issues. [4] The broth......
-
CIBC v Ahmed, 2021 MBCA 25
...informed of the relevant circumstances (see Berscheid v Federated Co-operatives et al, 2018 MBCA 27 at paras 28-30; and R v Baldovi et al, 2018 MBCA 64 at paras 12-15). [6] In support of her position regarding recusal, the defendant refers to comments made by the motion judge, in an effort ......
-
R. v. Swanson, 2022 MBQB 138
...is no dispute as to the test for a finding of reasonable apprehension of bias. Manitoba Court of Appeal noted in R. v. Baldovi, 2018 MBCA 64, [13] Actual bias is not alleged in this case. Rather, the allegation relates to a reasonable apprehension of bias. While the test f......
4 cases
-
Jans Estate v Jans, 2020 SKCA 61
...Drugs Ltd. v Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 284 DLR (4th) 756 [Rando] (leave to appeal to the SCC refused, 2008 CanLII 2286), and R v Baldovi, 2018 MBCA 64, 363 CCC (3d) 224 [Baldovi] (leave to appeal to the SCC refused, 2019 CanLII 3756, 2019 CanLII 3747 and 2019 CanLII 3744). In Rando, the trial j......
-
R v Banayos and Banayos, 2018 MBCA 86
...of bias in respect of the judge who granted the first six wiretap authorizations, was dismissed earlier this year (see R v Baldovi et al, 2018 MBCA 64). [3] The accused had also raised a number of issues relating to conviction and sentence. This appeal deals with those issues. [4] The broth......
-
CIBC v Ahmed, 2021 MBCA 25
...informed of the relevant circumstances (see Berscheid v Federated Co-operatives et al, 2018 MBCA 27 at paras 28-30; and R v Baldovi et al, 2018 MBCA 64 at paras 12-15). [6] In support of her position regarding recusal, the defendant refers to comments made by the motion judge, in an effort ......
-
R. v. Swanson, 2022 MBQB 138
...is no dispute as to the test for a finding of reasonable apprehension of bias. Manitoba Court of Appeal noted in R. v. Baldovi, 2018 MBCA 64, [13] Actual bias is not alleged in this case. Rather, the allegation relates to a reasonable apprehension of bias. While the test f......