R v Baldovi et al
| Jurisdiction | Manitoba |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Manitoba) |
| Judge | Chief Justice Richard J. Chartier,Madam Justice Diana M. Cameron,Madam Justice Jennifer A. Pfuetzner |
| Citation | 2018 MBCA 64 |
| Docket Number | AR17-30-08813 |
| Date | 07 June 2018 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
9 practice notes
-
Jans Estate v Jans
...Drugs Ltd. v Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 284 DLR (4th) 756 [Rando] (leave to appeal to the SCC refused, 2008 CanLII 2286), and R v Baldovi, 2018 MBCA 64, 363 CCC (3d) 224 [Baldovi] (leave to appeal to the SCC refused, 2019 CanLII 3756, 2019 CanLII 3747 and 2019 CanLII 3744). In Rando, the trial j......
-
Michele Santarsieri Inc et al v Manitoba (Deputy Minister of Finance)
...issue of bias raises a question of mixed fact and law, reviewable on a standard of palpable and overriding error (see R v Baldovi et al, 2018 MBCA 64 at para 11). As we will explain, we are not persuaded that, on either standard of review, the judge made any error regarding bias that warran......
-
R. v. McKay
...court proceeding alone is not enough to satisfy the reasonable apprehension of bias test. R. v. Baldovi et al., 2018 MBCA 64, teaches that “[t]he jurisprudence is rife with examples where trial judges who have had previous conduct of a prosecution of an accused per......
-
R v Banayos and Banayos
...of bias in respect of the judge who granted the first six wiretap authorizations, was dismissed earlier this year (see R v Baldovi et al, 2018 MBCA 64). [3] The accused had also raised a number of issues relating to conviction and sentence. This appeal deals with those issues. [4] The broth......
Get Started for Free
9 cases
-
Jans Estate v Jans
...Drugs Ltd. v Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 284 DLR (4th) 756 [Rando] (leave to appeal to the SCC refused, 2008 CanLII 2286), and R v Baldovi, 2018 MBCA 64, 363 CCC (3d) 224 [Baldovi] (leave to appeal to the SCC refused, 2019 CanLII 3756, 2019 CanLII 3747 and 2019 CanLII 3744). In Rando, the trial j......
-
Michele Santarsieri Inc et al v Manitoba (Deputy Minister of Finance)
...issue of bias raises a question of mixed fact and law, reviewable on a standard of palpable and overriding error (see R v Baldovi et al, 2018 MBCA 64 at para 11). As we will explain, we are not persuaded that, on either standard of review, the judge made any error regarding bias that warran......
-
R. v. McKay
...court proceeding alone is not enough to satisfy the reasonable apprehension of bias test. R. v. Baldovi et al., 2018 MBCA 64, teaches that “[t]he jurisprudence is rife with examples where trial judges who have had previous conduct of a prosecution of an accused per......
-
R. v. Lilly
...it was based on an erroneous principle or resulted in a miscarriage of justice (R. v. Werner, 2005 NWTCA 5 at ¶16). [42] In R. v. Baldovi, 2018 MBCA 64, the court [11] Pure questions of law are reviewed on a standard of correctness. In the criminal law context, the application of a legal te......
Get Started for Free
