R v Ballantyne, 2019 SKPC 32

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeM. BEATON, J
Citation2019 SKPC 32
CourtProvincial Court of Saskatchewan (Canada)
Date15 July 2019
Docket Number24524400
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 practice notes
  • R v Napope,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • January 4, 2023
    ...(see: R v Otto, 2006 SKCA 52 at para 22, 279 Sask R 182; R v Goodpipe, 2019 SKQB 221 at para 55, affirmed 2021 SKCA 122; R v Ballantyne, 2019 SKPC 32 at para 85, affirmed 2022 SKCA 13; and R v Bitternose, 2013 ABCA 220 at paras 36 In this case, the sentencing judge concluded that Mr. Napope......
  • R. v. GOODPIPE, 2019 SKQB 221
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • September 6, 2019
    ...of future behaviour. [17] The purpose of identifying a pattern of past violent conduct is to predict future risk. In R v Ballantyne, 2019 SKPC 32, Beaton P.C.J. stated (at para. 65): 65 The pattern analysis is aimed at predicting risk. The pattern, including the predicate offence, must cons......
  • R. v. Keenatch, 2019 SKPC 38
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • August 28, 2019
    ...in determining whether an offender should be designated as dangerous. These criteria were interpreted by Judge Beaton in R v Ballantyne, 2019 SKPC 32, at para [56] The Supreme of Canada in R v Boutilier, 2017 SCC 64, [2017] 2 SCR 936 [Boutilier] at para 26 confirmed its interpretation of se......
  • R v Napope,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • January 4, 2023
    ...(see: R v Otto, 2006 SKCA 52 at para 22, 279 Sask R 182; R v Goodpipe, 2019 SKQB 221 at para 55, affirmed 2021 SKCA 122; R v Ballantyne, 2019 SKPC 32 at para 85, affirmed 2022 SKCA 13; and R v Bitternose, 2013 ABCA 220 at paras 11-12). [36]        &#x......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
  • R v Napope,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • January 4, 2023
    ...(see: R v Otto, 2006 SKCA 52 at para 22, 279 Sask R 182; R v Goodpipe, 2019 SKQB 221 at para 55, affirmed 2021 SKCA 122; R v Ballantyne, 2019 SKPC 32 at para 85, affirmed 2022 SKCA 13; and R v Bitternose, 2013 ABCA 220 at paras 36 In this case, the sentencing judge concluded that Mr. Napope......
  • R. v. GOODPIPE, 2019 SKQB 221
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • September 6, 2019
    ...of future behaviour. [17] The purpose of identifying a pattern of past violent conduct is to predict future risk. In R v Ballantyne, 2019 SKPC 32, Beaton P.C.J. stated (at para. 65): 65 The pattern analysis is aimed at predicting risk. The pattern, including the predicate offence, must cons......
  • R. v. Keenatch, 2019 SKPC 38
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • August 28, 2019
    ...in determining whether an offender should be designated as dangerous. These criteria were interpreted by Judge Beaton in R v Ballantyne, 2019 SKPC 32, at para [56] The Supreme of Canada in R v Boutilier, 2017 SCC 64, [2017] 2 SCR 936 [Boutilier] at para 26 confirmed its interpretation of se......
  • R v Napope,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • January 4, 2023
    ...(see: R v Otto, 2006 SKCA 52 at para 22, 279 Sask R 182; R v Goodpipe, 2019 SKQB 221 at para 55, affirmed 2021 SKCA 122; R v Ballantyne, 2019 SKPC 32 at para 85, affirmed 2022 SKCA 13; and R v Bitternose, 2013 ABCA 220 at paras 11-12). [36]        &#x......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT