R v Ballantyne
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Court | Provincial Court of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
| Judge | M. BEATON, J |
| Citation | 2019 SKPC 32 |
| Docket Number | 24524400 |
| Date | 15 July 2019 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
7 practice notes
-
R v Napope
...(see: R v Otto, 2006 SKCA 52 at para 22, 279 Sask R 182; R v Goodpipe, 2019 SKQB 221 at para 55, affirmed 2021 SKCA 122; R v Ballantyne, 2019 SKPC 32 at para 85, affirmed 2022 SKCA 13; and R v Bitternose, 2013 ABCA 220 at paras 11-12). [36] In this case, the sentencing judge concluded that ......
-
R. v. Dionne
...(see: R v Otto, 2006 SKCA 52 at para 22, 279 Sask R 182; R v Goodpipe, 2019 SKQB 221 at para 55, affirmed 2021 SKCA 122; R v Ballantyne, 2019 SKPC 32 at para 85, affirmed 2022 SKCA 13; and R v Bitternose, 2013 ABCA 220 at paras [193] The court in Napope, supra, noted that ......
-
R. v. GOODPIPE
...of future behaviour. [17] The purpose of identifying a pattern of past violent conduct is to predict future risk. In R v Ballantyne, 2019 SKPC 32, Beaton P.C.J. stated (at para. 65): 65 The pattern analysis is aimed at predicting risk. The pattern, including the predicate offence, must cons......
-
R. v. Keenatch
...in determining whether an offender should be designated as dangerous. These criteria were interpreted by Judge Beaton in R v Ballantyne, 2019 SKPC 32, at para [56] The Supreme of Canada in R v Boutilier, 2017 SCC 64, [2017] 2 SCR 936 [Boutilier] at para 26 confirmed its interpretation of se......
Get Started for Free
6 cases
-
R. v. Dionne
...(see: R v Otto, 2006 SKCA 52 at para 22, 279 Sask R 182; R v Goodpipe, 2019 SKQB 221 at para 55, affirmed 2021 SKCA 122; R v Ballantyne, 2019 SKPC 32 at para 85, affirmed 2022 SKCA 13; and R v Bitternose, 2013 ABCA 220 at paras [193] The court in Napope, supra, noted that ......
-
R v Napope
...(see: R v Otto, 2006 SKCA 52 at para 22, 279 Sask R 182; R v Goodpipe, 2019 SKQB 221 at para 55, affirmed 2021 SKCA 122; R v Ballantyne, 2019 SKPC 32 at para 85, affirmed 2022 SKCA 13; and R v Bitternose, 2013 ABCA 220 at paras 11-12). [36]        &#x......
-
R. v. GOODPIPE
...of future behaviour. [17] The purpose of identifying a pattern of past violent conduct is to predict future risk. In R v Ballantyne, 2019 SKPC 32, Beaton P.C.J. stated (at para. 65): 65 The pattern analysis is aimed at predicting risk. The pattern, including the predicate offence, must cons......
-
R. v. Keenatch
...in determining whether an offender should be designated as dangerous. These criteria were interpreted by Judge Beaton in R v Ballantyne, 2019 SKPC 32, at para [56] The Supreme of Canada in R v Boutilier, 2017 SCC 64, [2017] 2 SCR 936 [Boutilier] at para 26 confirmed its interpretation of se......
Get Started for Free
