R v Barca

JurisdictionManitoba
JudgeBeard,Simonsen,Spivak
Date12 October 2022
Docket NumberAR21-30-09583; AR21-30-09638
Citation2022 MBCA 80
CourtCourt of Appeal (Manitoba)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
2 practice notes
  • R v Ballantyne et al
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • March 31, 2023
    ...sentencing objectives in a case such as this, the personal circumstances of the co-accused are afforded lesser weight (see R v Barca, 2022 MBCA 80 at para 48).  Nonetheless, the trial judge understood that the objective of rehabilitation should not be ignored, was alert to the principl......
  • R v Baptiste
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • June 20, 2025
    ...is discharged. 64 The following essential elements of s. 244.2(1)(b) were summarized by the Manitoba Court of Appeal, in R. v. Barca, 2022 MBCA 80 at para. (i) the accused discharged a firearm; (ii) the accused intended to discharge the firearm; and (iii) in doing so, the accused was reckle......
2 cases
  • R v Ballantyne et al
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • March 31, 2023
    ...sentencing objectives in a case such as this, the personal circumstances of the co-accused are afforded lesser weight (see R v Barca, 2022 MBCA 80 at para 48).  Nonetheless, the trial judge understood that the objective of rehabilitation should not be ignored, was alert to the principl......
  • R v Baptiste
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • June 20, 2025
    ...is discharged. 64 The following essential elements of s. 244.2(1)(b) were summarized by the Manitoba Court of Appeal, in R. v. Barca, 2022 MBCA 80 at para. (i) the accused discharged a firearm; (ii) the accused intended to discharge the firearm; and (iii) in doing so, the accused was reckle......