R v Barton
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Judge | Antonio; Feehan; Kirker |
| Judgment Date | 29 January 2024 |
| Citation | 2024 ABCA 34 |
| Docket Number | 2103-0187A |
| Date | 29 January 2024 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
12 practice notes
-
R v. Chung
...intent ....”; see also Ali at para 6 and R v Barton, 2020 ABQB 284, Hillier J at paras 57 and 61 [appeal dismissed, R v Barton, 2024 ABCA 34, a decision issued after these reasons were delivered [34] In Nolet, the Supreme Court referred with approval to the decision of Justice Doherty in Br......
-
R v. Park
...57), adding that “‘virtual certainty’ . . . connotes the very high degree of certainty required” (ibid at para 56; see also R v Barton, 2024 ABCA 34 at para 150; R v Ellis, 2023 NSCA 63 at para 47; R v Alsager, 2016 SKCA 91 at para [45] Courts have affirmed that the intent for assault also ......
-
R v. Nguyen
...by showing the search was authorized by law, the law was reasonable and the search was carried out in a reasonable manner: R v Barton, 2024 ABCA 34 at paras 81-82; Collins at 278; Neumann at para 38; Jennings (2018 ABQB 296) at para [178] As noted above, a Charter br......
-
R v. Simmons
...with regard to the nature of the liberty interfered with and the importance of the public purpose served. I refer as well to R v Barton, 2024 ABCA 34 at paras [93] In this case, the police power at issue is the asking of questions as a prelude to a search. The liberty interest at stake is, ......
Get Started for Free
12 cases
-
R v. Chung
...intent ....”; see also Ali at para 6 and R v Barton, 2020 ABQB 284, Hillier J at paras 57 and 61 [appeal dismissed, R v Barton, 2024 ABCA 34, a decision issued after these reasons were delivered [34] In Nolet, the Supreme Court referred with approval to the decision of Justice Doherty in Br......
-
R v. Park
...57), adding that “‘virtual certainty’ . . . connotes the very high degree of certainty required” (ibid at para 56; see also R v Barton, 2024 ABCA 34 at para 150; R v Ellis, 2023 NSCA 63 at para 47; R v Alsager, 2016 SKCA 91 at para [45] Courts have affirmed that the intent for assault also ......
-
R v. Nguyen
...by showing the search was authorized by law, the law was reasonable and the search was carried out in a reasonable manner: R v Barton, 2024 ABCA 34 at paras 81-82; Collins at 278; Neumann at para 38; Jennings (2018 ABQB 296) at para [178] As noted above, a Charter br......
-
R v. Simmons
...with regard to the nature of the liberty interfered with and the importance of the public purpose served. I refer as well to R v Barton, 2024 ABCA 34 at paras [93] In this case, the police power at issue is the asking of questions as a prelude to a search. The liberty interest at stake is, ......
Get Started for Free
