R. v. Batista (S.W.),
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | N. Brown, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Citation | 2015 BCSC 244,[2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 244,[2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 244 (SC) |
| Date | 19 February 2015 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
2 practice notes
-
R. v. Asemota,
...vehicle, the existence of additional reasons to stop does not transform a lawful detention into an arbitrary one: see also R. v. Batista, 2015 BCSC 244 (CanLII), para. [34] To determine whether the arrest of Mr. Asemota was lawful, it is necessary to set out t......
-
R. v. Batista (S.W.),
...dire ruling in this case. The first voir dire dealt with alleged breaches of the accused's ss. 8 and 9 Charter rights: R. v. Batista , 2015 BCSC 244. In those reasons, I concluded that Mr. Batista was not arbitrarily detained contrary to s. 9 of the Charter , but that his s. 8 Charter right......
2 cases
-
R. v. Asemota
...vehicle, the existence of additional reasons to stop does not transform a lawful detention into an arbitrary one: see also R. v. Batista, 2015 BCSC 244 (CanLII), para. [34]       To determine whether the arrest of Mr. Asemota was lawful, it is necessary to set out t......
-
R. v. Batista (S.W.)
...dire ruling in this case. The first voir dire dealt with alleged breaches of the accused's ss. 8 and 9 Charter rights: R. v. Batista , 2015 BCSC 244. In those reasons, I concluded that Mr. Batista was not arbitrarily detained contrary to s. 9 of the Charter , but that his s. 8 Charter right......