R. v. Bernard, 2018 ABCA 396

JudgePeter Martin,Jack Watson,Frans Slatter
Citation2018 ABCA 396
CourtCourt of Appeal (Alberta)
Docket Number1701-0277-A
Date26 November 2018
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
14 practice notes
  • R. v. Barrett,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 3 Diciembre 2020
    ...403; R. v. Barrett, 2016 NSSC 43; R. v. Khelawon, 2006 SCC 57; R. v. Bradshaw, 2017 SCC 35; R. v. Hall, 2018 MBCA 122; R. v. Bernard, 2018 ABCA 396; D’Amico c. R., 2019 QCCA 77; R. v. Nurse, 2019 ONCA 260; R. v. Khalon, 2020 ABCA 124; R v. Herntier, 2020 MBCA 95; R. v. Taylor, 2012 ONCA 809......
  • R v Profeit,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 23 Noviembre 2021
    ...principles set out in R v Bradshaw, 2017 SCC 35, [2017] 1 SCR 865 and R v Khelawon, 2006 SCC 57, [2006] 2 SCR 787: see also R v Bernard, 2018 ABCA 396 at paras 12-21, 368 CCC (3d) 437. We need not dwell on this topic in light of how the submissions made at the hearing of the appeal unfolded......
  • R v Peterson,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 31 Octubre 2022
    ...in the decision of Justice Karakatsanis in R v Bradshaw, 2017 SCC 35. See also R v Khelawon 2006 SCC 578, Charron J; R v Bernard, 2018 ABCA 396 (unless otherwise noted, paragraph references are to A. Hearsay [3]             &#......
  • Khaleel v Indar,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 29 Septiembre 2023
    ...cross-examine must accept the evidentiary consequences of failing to challenge the evidence: R v Palmer, [1980] 1 SCR 759; R v Bernard, 2018 ABCA 396 at paras 31-34. Because Dr. Wu was not cross-examined, I accept his evidence. However, for the reasons explained below, accepting Dr. Wu&apos......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
14 cases
  • R. v. Barrett,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 3 Diciembre 2020
    ...403; R. v. Barrett, 2016 NSSC 43; R. v. Khelawon, 2006 SCC 57; R. v. Bradshaw, 2017 SCC 35; R. v. Hall, 2018 MBCA 122; R. v. Bernard, 2018 ABCA 396; D’Amico c. R., 2019 QCCA 77; R. v. Nurse, 2019 ONCA 260; R. v. Khalon, 2020 ABCA 124; R v. Herntier, 2020 MBCA 95; R. v. Taylor, 2012 ONCA 809......
  • R v Profeit,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 23 Noviembre 2021
    ...principles set out in R v Bradshaw, 2017 SCC 35, [2017] 1 SCR 865 and R v Khelawon, 2006 SCC 57, [2006] 2 SCR 787: see also R v Bernard, 2018 ABCA 396 at paras 12-21, 368 CCC (3d) 437. We need not dwell on this topic in light of how the submissions made at the hearing of the appeal unfolded......
  • R v Peterson,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 31 Octubre 2022
    ...in the decision of Justice Karakatsanis in R v Bradshaw, 2017 SCC 35. See also R v Khelawon 2006 SCC 578, Charron J; R v Bernard, 2018 ABCA 396 (unless otherwise noted, paragraph references are to A. Hearsay [3]             &#......
  • Khaleel v Indar,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 29 Septiembre 2023
    ...cross-examine must accept the evidentiary consequences of failing to challenge the evidence: R v Palmer, [1980] 1 SCR 759; R v Bernard, 2018 ABCA 396 at paras 31-34. Because Dr. Wu was not cross-examined, I accept his evidence. However, for the reasons explained below, accepting Dr. Wu&apos......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT