R. v. Bertrand Marchand
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Judge | Andromache Karakatsanis; Suzanne Côté; Malcolm Rowe; Sheilah Martin; Nicholas Kasirer; Mahmud Jamal; Michelle O’Bonsawin |
| Citation | 2023 SCC 26 |
| Docket Number | 39935; 40093 |
| Date | 03 November 2023 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
127 practice notes
-
R v Sheppard
...[293] In Friesen, the Supreme Court considered sentencing principles for sexual offences against children. See also R v Bertrand Marchand, 2023 SCC 26. The Court said in Friesen that the prime interests protected in the legislative scheme are personal autonomy, bodily integrity, sexual inte......
-
R. v. Jogiyat
...youthful offenders who are not being sentenced as youths. The Supreme Court of Canada recently confirmed this in R. v. Bertrand Marchand, 2023 SCC 26, 487 D.L.R. (4th) 201, at para. 132, where it stated, “Even though an 18-year-old offender falls outside the scope of the youth criminal just......
-
R v L.A.
...See also R c X at para 17). [110] One sees further application of that principle at work in the recent decision of R v Bertrand Marchand, 2023 SCC 26 [Bertrand Marchand] wherein the Supreme Court overturned a decision of the Québec Court of Appeal, which had held that a pre‑Friesen sentence......
-
Quebec (Attorney General) v. Senneville
...Cases Cited By Moreau J. Applied: R. v. Hills, 2023 SCC 2 ; R. v. Nur, 2015 SCC 15 , [2015] 1 S.C.R. 773 ; R. v. Bertrand Marchand, 2023 SCC 26; explained: R. v. Goltz, [1991] 3 S.C.R. 485 ; considered: R. v. Friesen, 2020 SCC 9 , [2020] 1 S.C.R. 424 ; referred to: R. v. Parranto, 20......
Get Started for Free
127 cases
-
R v Sheppard
...[293] In Friesen, the Supreme Court considered sentencing principles for sexual offences against children. See also R v Bertrand Marchand, 2023 SCC 26. The Court said in Friesen that the prime interests protected in the legislative scheme are personal autonomy, bodily integrity, sexual inte......
-
R. v. Jogiyat
...youthful offenders who are not being sentenced as youths. The Supreme Court of Canada recently confirmed this in R. v. Bertrand Marchand, 2023 SCC 26, 487 D.L.R. (4th) 201, at para. 132, where it stated, “Even though an 18-year-old offender falls outside the scope of the youth criminal just......
-
R v L.A.
...See also R c X at para 17). [110] One sees further application of that principle at work in the recent decision of R v Bertrand Marchand, 2023 SCC 26 [Bertrand Marchand] wherein the Supreme Court overturned a decision of the Québec Court of Appeal, which had held that a pre‑Friesen sentence......
-
Quebec (Attorney General) v. Senneville
...Cases Cited By Moreau J. Applied: R. v. Hills, 2023 SCC 2 ; R. v. Nur, 2015 SCC 15 , [2015] 1 S.C.R. 773 ; R. v. Bertrand Marchand, 2023 SCC 26; explained: R. v. Goltz, [1991] 3 S.C.R. 485 ; considered: R. v. Friesen, 2020 SCC 9 , [2020] 1 S.C.R. 424 ; referred to: R. v. Parranto, 20......
Get Started for Free
