R v Bird, 2020 ABQB 594
| Judge | Honourable Mr. Justice A. D. Macleod |
| Citation | 2020 ABQB 594 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Date | 13 October 2020 |
| Docket Number | 150219624Q2 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
Table of Cases
...[1980] 1 SCR 1124, 13 C.R. (3d) 129, [1980] S.C.J. No. 33 ............................................................461 R. v. Bird, 2020 ABQB 594 ........................................................................................................................ 542–43 R. v. Charest (......
-
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
...incarceration conditions, or led to the denial of rehabilitative opportunities. Disability and the Defence of Provocation R. v. Bird , 2020 ABQB 594 — In the context of a second-degree murder trial, the court convicted the Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) accused and held that the obj......
-
Engen v Hyundai Auto Canada Corp.,
...Departing from my usual practice, as recently as August 31, 2020 (Bruno v. Samson Cree Nation, 2020 ABQB 594), I have decided that, in these Reasons, 20 years after Western v. Dutton 2001 SCC 46 and Hollick v. Toronto (City), 2001 SCC 68, and other subsequent decisions, it is no longer nece......
-
R v Bird,
...have made it more difficult for him to make a more measured response to being punched in the face. I accept that evidence. R v Bird, 2020 ABQB 594 at para [26] Then, in addressing the mens rea issue, the trial judge stated at para ......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
-
Engen v Hyundai Auto Canada Corp.,
...Departing from my usual practice, as recently as August 31, 2020 (Bruno v. Samson Cree Nation, 2020 ABQB 594), I have decided that, in these Reasons, 20 years after Western v. Dutton 2001 SCC 46 and Hollick v. Toronto (City), 2001 SCC 68, and other subsequent decisions, it is no longer nece......
-
R v Bird,
...have made it more difficult for him to make a more measured response to being punched in the face. I accept that evidence. R v Bird, 2020 ABQB 594 at para [26] Then, in addressing the mens rea issue, the trial judge stated at para ......
-
R v Bird,
...have made it more difficult for him to make a more measured response to being punched in the face. I accept that evidence. R v Bird , 2020 ABQB 594 at para 24. 26 Then, in addressing the mens rea issue, the trial judge stated at para 26: It is clear on the evidence that Mr. Bird intended to......
-
R. v. Assi,
...of one's manners or returning a punch to the face. We are talking about provocation in the context of a charge of murder". (R. v. Bird, 2020 ABQB 594 (CanLII) at para. [84] The Crown argues that the objective test should also consider the "ordinary person" to have the same occupation as Mr.......
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...[1980] 1 SCR 1124, 13 C.R. (3d) 129, [1980] S.C.J. No. 33 ............................................................461 R. v. Bird, 2020 ABQB 594 ........................................................................................................................ 542–43 R. v. Charest (......
-
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
...incarceration conditions, or led to the denial of rehabilitative opportunities. Disability and the Defence of Provocation R. v. Bird , 2020 ABQB 594 — In the context of a second-degree murder trial, the court convicted the Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) accused and held that the obj......