R. v. Blanchard, 2019 SCC 9

JudgeWagner, Richard; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Gascon, Clément; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Case DateFebruary 13, 2019
JurisdictionCanada (Federal)
Citations2019 SCC 9
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • R. v. T.A.P.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 23 Enero 2023
    ...no doubt haunt all three for years to come, if not for the rest of their lives. [26]       In R. v. Friesen, 2019 SCC 9, the Supreme Court of Canada observed at para. 51 that sexual violence against children is wrongful because it invades their personal autonom......
  • R. v. Theriault,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 5 Noviembre 2020
    ...above or below the range may nonetheless amount to a proportionate sentence; see R. v. Lacasse, supra, at paras. 57-60 and R. v. Friesen, 2019 SCC 9 at paras. [63] The Crown argues that in view of the particular factual matrix in this case, there is no applicable range of sentence that can ......
  • Summaries Sunday: Supreme Advocacy
    • Canada
    • Slaw Canada’s Online Legal Magazine
    • 24 Febrero 2019
    ...allowed and the convictions are restored.” Criminal Law: Refusal to Blow; Automatism R. v. Blanchard, 2018 QCCA 1069; 2019 SCC 9 Brown J.: “We would allow the appeal. At trial and during oral argument at the Court of Appeal, the Crown conceded the availability of the defence of extreme into......
2 cases
  • R. v. T.A.P.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 23 Enero 2023
    ...no doubt haunt all three for years to come, if not for the rest of their lives. [26]       In R. v. Friesen, 2019 SCC 9, the Supreme Court of Canada observed at para. 51 that sexual violence against children is wrongful because it invades their personal autonom......
  • R. v. Theriault,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 5 Noviembre 2020
    ...above or below the range may nonetheless amount to a proportionate sentence; see R. v. Lacasse, supra, at paras. 57-60 and R. v. Friesen, 2019 SCC 9 at paras. [63] The Crown argues that in view of the particular factual matrix in this case, there is no applicable range of sentence that can ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT