R v Boehmer, 2019 SKCA 74

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeThe Honourable Mr. Justice Leurer,The Honourable Chief Justice Richards,The Honourable Mr. Justice Tholl
Citation2019 SKCA 74
CourtCourt of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
Docket NumberCACR3135
Date02 August 2019
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • R v Spencer,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 23 d3 Novembro d3 2022
    ...conclusion of trial in a superior court. He also referred to the recommended analytical framework adopted by this Court in R v Boehmer, 2019 SKCA 74 at para 29, [2020] 3 WWR 509 [Boehmer] for assessing applications for a stay of proceedings based on unreasonable delay, and, after doing so, ......
  • R v Lemioer, 2019 SKCA 95
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 20 d5 Setembro d5 2019
    ...an accused, is an exceptional circumstance justifying an extension of time if the Crown is not able to mitigate that delay: R v Boehmer, 2019 SKCA 74 at para 43 [Boehmer]. In this case, it is of no consequence whether the delay flowing from the change in counsel is called defence delay or a......
  • R v Gardener,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 18 d3 Janeiro d3 2023
    ...(a 77-day delay from April 8 to June 23, 2020) as a discrete exceptional circumstance. Applying the approach set out in R v Boehmer, 2019 SKCA 74 at paras 29-30, [2020] 3 WWR 509, the trial judge deducted these periods from the total period under consideration leaving a remaining delay......
  • R v Gardener,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 18 d3 Janeiro d3 2023
    ...(a 77-day delay from April 8 to June 23, 2020) as a discrete exceptional circumstance. Applying the approach set out in R v Boehmer, 2019 SKCA 74 at paras 29-30, [2020] 3 WWR 509, the trial judge deducted these periods from the total period under consideration leaving a remaining delay of 1......
4 cases
  • R v Spencer,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 23 d3 Novembro d3 2022
    ...conclusion of trial in a superior court. He also referred to the recommended analytical framework adopted by this Court in R v Boehmer, 2019 SKCA 74 at para 29, [2020] 3 WWR 509 [Boehmer] for assessing applications for a stay of proceedings based on unreasonable delay, and, after doing so, ......
  • R v Lemioer, 2019 SKCA 95
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 20 d5 Setembro d5 2019
    ...an accused, is an exceptional circumstance justifying an extension of time if the Crown is not able to mitigate that delay: R v Boehmer, 2019 SKCA 74 at para 43 [Boehmer]. In this case, it is of no consequence whether the delay flowing from the change in counsel is called defence delay or a......
  • R v Gardener,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 18 d3 Janeiro d3 2023
    ...(a 77-day delay from April 8 to June 23, 2020) as a discrete exceptional circumstance. Applying the approach set out in R v Boehmer, 2019 SKCA 74 at paras 29-30, [2020] 3 WWR 509, the trial judge deducted these periods from the total period under consideration leaving a remaining delay......
  • R v Gardener,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 18 d3 Janeiro d3 2023
    ...(a 77-day delay from April 8 to June 23, 2020) as a discrete exceptional circumstance. Applying the approach set out in R v Boehmer, 2019 SKCA 74 at paras 29-30, [2020] 3 WWR 509, the trial judge deducted these periods from the total period under consideration leaving a remaining delay of 1......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT