R v Boehmer, 2019 SKCA 74
Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Leurer,The Honourable Chief Justice Richards,The Honourable Mr. Justice Tholl |
Citation | 2019 SKCA 74 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
Docket Number | CACR3135 |
Date | 02 August 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
R v Spencer,
...conclusion of trial in a superior court. He also referred to the recommended analytical framework adopted by this Court in R v Boehmer, 2019 SKCA 74 at para 29, [2020] 3 WWR 509 [Boehmer] for assessing applications for a stay of proceedings based on unreasonable delay, and, after doing so, ......
-
R v Lemioer, 2019 SKCA 95
...an accused, is an exceptional circumstance justifying an extension of time if the Crown is not able to mitigate that delay: R v Boehmer, 2019 SKCA 74 at para 43 [Boehmer]. In this case, it is of no consequence whether the delay flowing from the change in counsel is called defence delay or a......
-
R v Gardener,
...(a 77-day delay from April 8 to June 23, 2020) as a discrete exceptional circumstance. Applying the approach set out in R v Boehmer, 2019 SKCA 74 at paras 29-30, [2020] 3 WWR 509, the trial judge deducted these periods from the total period under consideration leaving a remaining delay......
-
R v Gardener,
...(a 77-day delay from April 8 to June 23, 2020) as a discrete exceptional circumstance. Applying the approach set out in R v Boehmer, 2019 SKCA 74 at paras 29-30, [2020] 3 WWR 509, the trial judge deducted these periods from the total period under consideration leaving a remaining delay of 1......
4 cases
-
R v Spencer,
...conclusion of trial in a superior court. He also referred to the recommended analytical framework adopted by this Court in R v Boehmer, 2019 SKCA 74 at para 29, [2020] 3 WWR 509 [Boehmer] for assessing applications for a stay of proceedings based on unreasonable delay, and, after doing so, ......
-
R v Lemioer, 2019 SKCA 95
...an accused, is an exceptional circumstance justifying an extension of time if the Crown is not able to mitigate that delay: R v Boehmer, 2019 SKCA 74 at para 43 [Boehmer]. In this case, it is of no consequence whether the delay flowing from the change in counsel is called defence delay or a......
-
R v Gardener,
...(a 77-day delay from April 8 to June 23, 2020) as a discrete exceptional circumstance. Applying the approach set out in R v Boehmer, 2019 SKCA 74 at paras 29-30, [2020] 3 WWR 509, the trial judge deducted these periods from the total period under consideration leaving a remaining delay......
-
R v Gardener,
...(a 77-day delay from April 8 to June 23, 2020) as a discrete exceptional circumstance. Applying the approach set out in R v Boehmer, 2019 SKCA 74 at paras 29-30, [2020] 3 WWR 509, the trial judge deducted these periods from the total period under consideration leaving a remaining delay of 1......