R. v. Borel,

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeLauwers, Miller and Nordheimer JJ.A.
Neutral Citation2021 ONCA 16
Docket NumberC62693
Date12 January 2021
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • July 25, 2022
    ...AAW 495, 525 Lake v Brown 731 Lake v Lake (1983 BCSC) 211 Lake v Lake (1988 NSCA) 176, 725 Lalonde v Agha (2020 ONSC) 740 Lalonde v Agha (2021 ONCA) 16, 18, 19, 20 Lalonde v Lalonde (1994 Ont Gen Div) 170 Lalonde v Lalonde (2014 ONSC) 325, 328 Lalonde v Lalonde (2016 ABQB) 409 Lalonde v Pot......
  • Court Of Appeal Cautions Counsel And Trial Judges About The Danger Of Loose Thinking About Admissibility Of Evidence - Orders A New Trial In Attempted Murder Case
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • January 21, 2021
    ...man was granted the right to a new trial by the Ontario Court of Appeal in R. v. Borel, 2021 ONCA 16. He was convicted by a jury on May 22, 2014 in relation to a July 2011 incident in which his girlfriend, the complainant, was badly burned. The complainant alleged that her boyfriend doused ......
  • R. v. J.C.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • September 1, 2022
    ...evidence will legitimately assist the trier of fact: R. v. Z.W.C., 2021 ONCA 116, 155 O.R. (3d) 129, at para. 122; R. v. Borel, 2021 ONCA 16; 153 O.R. (3d) 672, at para. 48.  To prove the extortion charge, the Crown must prove that the applicant had a video of the complainant having se......
  • R. v. Matthews,
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada)
    • March 18, 2021
    ...The exception for spontaneous utterances has been historically, and somewhat imprecisely, referred to as res gestae: see R. v. Borel, 2021 ONCA 16 at para. 50 and R. v. Camara, 2021 ONCA 79 at para. 85.  The Ontario Court of Appeal explained the rationale for the exception in R. v. Kha......
2 cases
  • R. v. J.C.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • September 1, 2022
    ...evidence will legitimately assist the trier of fact: R. v. Z.W.C., 2021 ONCA 116, 155 O.R. (3d) 129, at para. 122; R. v. Borel, 2021 ONCA 16; 153 O.R. (3d) 672, at para. 48.  To prove the extortion charge, the Crown must prove that the applicant had a video of the complainant having se......
  • R. v. Matthews,
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada)
    • March 18, 2021
    ...The exception for spontaneous utterances has been historically, and somewhat imprecisely, referred to as res gestae: see R. v. Borel, 2021 ONCA 16 at para. 50 and R. v. Camara, 2021 ONCA 79 at para. 85.  The Ontario Court of Appeal explained the rationale for the exception in R. v. Kha......
1 firm's commentaries
1 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • July 25, 2022
    ...AAW 495, 525 Lake v Brown 731 Lake v Lake (1983 BCSC) 211 Lake v Lake (1988 NSCA) 176, 725 Lalonde v Agha (2020 ONSC) 740 Lalonde v Agha (2021 ONCA) 16, 18, 19, 20 Lalonde v Lalonde (1994 Ont Gen Div) 170 Lalonde v Lalonde (2014 ONSC) 325, 328 Lalonde v Lalonde (2016 ABQB) 409 Lalonde v Pot......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT