R. v. Brame (K.), [2004] B.C.A.C. Uned. 194 (YukCA)
| Jurisdiction | Yukon |
| Judge | Donald, Hall and Mackenzie, JJ.A. |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Yukon Territory) |
| Subject Matter | CRIMINAL LAW,EVIDENCE |
| Citation | [2004] B.C.A.C. Uned. 194 (YukCA),2004 YKCA 13,[2004] B.C.A.C. Uned. 194 |
| Date | 04 October 2004 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
R. v. O'Brien (K.J.), (2012) 275 Man.R.(2d) 144 (CA)
...O.A.C. 121 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 28]. R. v. Sanderson, 2004 ONCJ 329, refd to. [para. 42]. R. v. Brame (K.), [2004] B.C.A.C. Uned. 194; 2004 YKCA 13, refd to. [para. R. v. Tibando (M.) (1994), 69 O.A.C. 225 (C.A.), leave to appeal denied (1994), 176 N.R. 318 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 59].......
-
L.C. v. K.T., 2018 NSCA 92
...violence victims to impermissibly reach any conclusion with regard to the respondent’s credibility: see, for example, R. v. Brame, 2004 YKCA 13; R. v. A.R.J.D., 2018 SCC 6 aff’g R. v. A.R.J.D., 2017 ABCA 237; R. v. J.L., 2018 ONCA 756 at ¶47. The central issues before the judge were whether......
-
R v MacDonald,
...domestic assault victim will react. [Emphasis added] [66] In R v Brame, 2004 YKCA 13 [Brame], the Yukon Court of Appeal upheld a trial decision which took ‘judicial notice' of the behaviour patterns of victims of domest......
-
R. v. Thompson, 2019 BCCA 1
...[54] The same can be said for impermissible reasoning as to how a stereotypical domestic assault victim will react. [55] In R. v. Brame, 2004 YKCA 13, the Yukon Court of Appeal found that the trial judge did not err in declining to draw a negative inference regarding the complainant’s credi......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
R. v. O'Brien (K.J.), (2012) 275 Man.R.(2d) 144 (CA)
...O.A.C. 121 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 28]. R. v. Sanderson, 2004 ONCJ 329, refd to. [para. 42]. R. v. Brame (K.), [2004] B.C.A.C. Uned. 194; 2004 YKCA 13, refd to. [para. R. v. Tibando (M.) (1994), 69 O.A.C. 225 (C.A.), leave to appeal denied (1994), 176 N.R. 318 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 59].......
-
L.C. v. K.T., 2018 NSCA 92
...violence victims to impermissibly reach any conclusion with regard to the respondent’s credibility: see, for example, R. v. Brame, 2004 YKCA 13; R. v. A.R.J.D., 2018 SCC 6 aff’g R. v. A.R.J.D., 2017 ABCA 237; R. v. J.L., 2018 ONCA 756 at ¶47. The central issues before the judge were whether......
-
R v MacDonald,
...domestic assault victim will react. [Emphasis added] [66] In R v Brame, 2004 YKCA 13 [Brame], the Yukon Court of Appeal upheld a trial decision which took ‘judicial notice' of the behaviour patterns of victims of domest......
-
R. v. Thompson, 2019 BCCA 1
...[54] The same can be said for impermissible reasoning as to how a stereotypical domestic assault victim will react. [55] In R. v. Brame, 2004 YKCA 13, the Yukon Court of Appeal found that the trial judge did not err in declining to draw a negative inference regarding the complainant’s credi......
Request a trial to view additional results