R. v. Bransford, 2019 BCCA 408
| Judge | The Honourable Madam Justice Garson; The Honourable Mr. Justice Abrioux; The Honourable Madam Justice DeWitt-Van Oosten |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Case Date | November 13, 2019 |
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Citations | 2019 BCCA 408 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
R. v. Charlie, 2020 BCCA 24
...where an appellant challenges the inferences drawn by a trial judge (as described recently by DeWitt‑Van Oosten J.A. in R. v. Bransford, 2019 BCCA 408 at paras. 31–34), I would dismiss the appeal on this ground. Question of Law [83] Charlie argues the reasons for judgment insufficiently des......
-
R. v. Cashman,
...2016 SCC 33 [Villaroman]. To support their position, the Crown also referred to a number of other authorities including R. v. Bransford, 2019 BCCA 408 [Bransford]; R. v. Webster, 2008 BCCA 458 [Webster]; R. v. Pham, [2005] O.J. No. 5127, 2005 CanLII 44671 (ONCA) (aff’d: 2006 SCC......
-
R. v. Doucet,
...reasonable, not just possible. [Emphasis added by Cromwell J.] [98] In R. v. Bransford, 2019 BCCA 408, the court discussed permissible inferences by trial judges regarding the use of circumstantial evidence. Madam Justice DeWitt-Van Oosten [31......
-
R. v. Greer,
...the defendant was in possession of cocaine, I find the reasoning applicable in this case involving weapons. [115] In R. v. Bransford, 2019 BCCA 408 [Bransford] the appellant, one of two adult occupants of a residence, was convicted of possession of drugs for the purpose of trafficking and p......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
R. v. Charlie, 2020 BCCA 24
...where an appellant challenges the inferences drawn by a trial judge (as described recently by DeWitt‑Van Oosten J.A. in R. v. Bransford, 2019 BCCA 408 at paras. 31–34), I would dismiss the appeal on this ground. Question of Law [83] Charlie argues the reasons for judgment insufficiently des......
-
R. v. Cashman,
...2016 SCC 33 [Villaroman]. To support their position, the Crown also referred to a number of other authorities including R. v. Bransford, 2019 BCCA 408 [Bransford]; R. v. Webster, 2008 BCCA 458 [Webster]; R. v. Pham, [2005] O.J. No. 5127, 2005 CanLII 44671 (ONCA) (aff’d: 2006 SCC......
-
R. v. Doucet,
...reasonable, not just possible. [Emphasis added by Cromwell J.] [98] In R. v. Bransford, 2019 BCCA 408, the court discussed permissible inferences by trial judges regarding the use of circumstantial evidence. Madam Justice DeWitt-Van Oosten [31......
-
R. v. Greer,
...the defendant was in possession of cocaine, I find the reasoning applicable in this case involving weapons. [115] In R. v. Bransford, 2019 BCCA 408 [Bransford] the appellant, one of two adult occupants of a residence, was convicted of possession of drugs for the purpose of trafficking and p......
Request a trial to view additional results