R v BRS, 2020 ABCA 29
Judge | The Honourable Madam Justice Marina Paperny,The Honourable Mr. Justice Peter Martin,The Honourable Madam Justice Sheila Greckol |
Date | 12 February 2020 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
Docket Number | 1901-0152-A |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 practice notes
-
R v Bains,
...2013 ABCA 41; R. v. Mackie, 2014 ABCA 221; R. v. Hepburn, 2010 ABCA 157; R. v. Morrison, 2019 SCC 15, selected pages; R. v. B.R.S., 2020 ABCA 29. [14] Defence Counsel has provided the Court with a Book of Authorities as follows: R v Alvi, 2018 ABPC 136; R v Ambrose, 2000 ABCA 264; R v Arcan......
-
R v Pettitt,
...or dispute, a judge may regard filed victim impact statements as evidence of the actual impact on a victim of a sexual offence: R v BRS, 2020 ABCA 29 at paras 24-25, 28 (“the trial judge was entitled to accept the contents of the victim impact statement as proof of the harm suffered&......
-
R v Runions,
...of my discussion in this regard, I would simply draw the parties’ attention to the recent Alberta Court of Appeal decision in R v BRS, 2020 ABCA 29. In the circumstances of that appeal, the Court of Appeal considered the respondent’s argument that psychological harm with forced sexual inter......
-
R v RM,,
...set out in s 38 of the YCJA. [37] The Alberta Court of Appeal in R v BRS, 2020 ABCA 29 characterizes the sexual assault in this case ... a serious violation of the physical and sexual integrity of the complainant and was of such in......
Request a trial to view additional results
10 cases
-
R v Bains,
...2013 ABCA 41; R. v. Mackie, 2014 ABCA 221; R. v. Hepburn, 2010 ABCA 157; R. v. Morrison, 2019 SCC 15, selected pages; R. v. B.R.S., 2020 ABCA 29. [14] Defence Counsel has provided the Court with a Book of Authorities as follows: R v Alvi, 2018 ABPC 136; R v Ambrose, 2000 ABCA 264; R v Arcan......
-
R v Pettitt,
...or dispute, a judge may regard filed victim impact statements as evidence of the actual impact on a victim of a sexual offence: R v BRS, 2020 ABCA 29 at paras 24-25, 28 (“the trial judge was entitled to accept the contents of the victim impact statement as proof of the harm suffered&......
-
R v Runions,
...of my discussion in this regard, I would simply draw the parties’ attention to the recent Alberta Court of Appeal decision in R v BRS, 2020 ABCA 29. In the circumstances of that appeal, the Court of Appeal considered the respondent’s argument that psychological harm with forced sexual inter......
-
R v RM,,
...set out in s 38 of the YCJA. [37] The Alberta Court of Appeal in R v BRS, 2020 ABCA 29 characterizes the sexual assault in this case ... a serious violation of the physical and sexual integrity of the complainant and was of such in......
Request a trial to view additional results