R v. Buecken

JurisdictionAlberta
CourtCourt of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Citation2025 ABKB 155
Docket Number221073919Q1
Date14 March 2025

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
2 practice notes
  • R v. Buonincontri
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 24, 2025
    ...Villaroman at paras 29-31; R v Cochrane, 2023 ABKB 666 at para 184; R v TS, 2023 ABKB 143 [TS KB] at para 99 affirmed TS CA; R v Buecken, 2025 ABKB 155 at para (b) a finding of guilt (or that a specific element of the offence exists) must be based on a permissible inference, not speculation......
  • R v. Despins
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • August 12, 2025
    ...statements and both voluntary “mixed statements” are admissible in accordance with R v Rojas, 2008 SCC 56 at para 37; R v Buecken, 2025 ABKB 155 at paras 19-21. As with any witness, I can accept or believe none, all, or any part of the statements, whether inculpatory or Defence Evidence [29......
2 cases
  • R v. Buonincontri
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 24, 2025
    ...Villaroman at paras 29-31; R v Cochrane, 2023 ABKB 666 at para 184; R v TS, 2023 ABKB 143 [TS KB] at para 99 affirmed TS CA; R v Buecken, 2025 ABKB 155 at para (b)           a finding of guilt (or that a specific element of the offence exist......
  • R v. Despins
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • August 12, 2025
    ...statements and both voluntary “mixed statements” are admissible in accordance with R v Rojas, 2008 SCC 56 at para 37; R v Buecken, 2025 ABKB 155 at paras 19-21. As with any witness, I can accept or believe none, all, or any part of the statements, whether inculpatory or Defence Evidence [29......