R. v. Bunbury (G.D.), [2005] Yukon Cases (TerrCt) 50

• Judge: Ruddy, J.
• Court: Territorial Court of Yukon (Canada)
• Case Date: June 24, 2005
• Jurisdiction: Yukon
• Citations: [2005] Yukon Cases (TerrCt) 50;2005 YKTC 50

R. v. Bunbury (G.D.), [2005] Yukon Cases (TerrCt) 50

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2005] Yukon Cases TBEd. SE.128

Regina v. Glen Douglas Bunbury

(04-00447; 2005 YKTC 50)

Indexed As: R. v. Bunbury (G.D.)

Yukon Territorial Court

Whitehorse

Ruddy, J.

June 24, 2005.

Summary:

This headnote contains no summary.

Civil Rights - Topic 3603

Detention and imprisonment - Detention - What constitutes arbitrary detention - See paragraphs 55 to 63.

Criminal Law - Topic 1372

Offences against person and reputation - Motor vehicles - Impaired driving - Breathalyzer or blood sample - Demand - Reasonable grounds - See paragraphs 27 to 40.

Criminal Law - Topic 1380

Offences against person and reputation - Motor vehicles - Impaired driving - Breathalyzer - Breath sample - Whether suitable (incl. whether blown directly into approved instrument) - See paragraphs 41 to 54.

Criminal Law - Topic 1386.2

Offences against person and reputation - Motor vehicles - Impaired driving - Roadside screening test - Time and place for - See paragraphs 17 to 26.

Cases Noticed:

R. v. Scurvey, 2002 YKTC 87, refd to. [para. 23].

R. v. Sandu, [2002] B.C.J. No. 696 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 32].

R. v. Rilling, [1976] 2 S.C.R. 183; 5 N.R. 327, refd to. [para. 37].

R. v. Bernshaw (N.), [1995] 1 S.C.R. 254; 176 N.R. 81; 53 B.C.A.C. 1; 87 W.A.C. 1, refd to. [para. 38].

R. v. Taylor, [1995] Y.J. No. 4 (Terr. Ct.), refd to. [para. 50].

R. v. Sheppard, [1999] Y.J. No. 25 (Terr. Ct.), refd to. [para. 52].

R. v. Tugnum (D.M.), [2002] B.C.T.C. 1572; 2002 BCSC 1572, refd to. [para. 57].

R. v. O'Connor (H.P.), [1995] 4 S.C.R. 411; 191 N.R. 1; 68 B.C.A.C. 1; 112 W.A.C. 1, refd to. [para. 62].

Counsel:

Tony Brown, for the Crown;

Malcolm Campbell, for the defence.

This case was heard by Ruddy, J., of the Yukon Territorial Court, who released the following judgment on June 24, 2005.

Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.