R. v. Burg and Khan, 2020 MBQB 137

JurisdictionManitoba
JudgeMARTIN J.
Citation2020 MBQB 137
Docket NumberCR 19-01-37520 (Winnipeg Centre)
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
Date24 September 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • R v Burg and Khan,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • September 15, 2021
    ...pursuant to r 37.2 of the MB, Court of Appeal Rules, MR 555/88R, this appeal was heard remotely by videoconference.   On appeal from 2020 MBQB 137   simonsen JA [1]                    Th......
  • R. v. D.J.H.,,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • July 9, 2021
    ...under the residual category. [44]        Counsel refers to the decision in R. v. Burg and Khan, 2020 MBQB 137, in which the application judge rejected the assertion that the Crown had “used the direct indictment process to gain a 12 month tactical a......
2 cases
  • R v Burg and Khan,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • September 15, 2021
    ...pursuant to r 37.2 of the MB, Court of Appeal Rules, MR 555/88R, this appeal was heard remotely by videoconference.   On appeal from 2020 MBQB 137   simonsen JA [1]                    Th......
  • R. v. D.J.H.,,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • July 9, 2021
    ...under the residual category. [44]        Counsel refers to the decision in R. v. Burg and Khan, 2020 MBQB 137, in which the application judge rejected the assertion that the Crown had “used the direct indictment process to gain a 12 month tactical a......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT