R v Burnett

JurisdictionManitoba
CourtCourt of Appeal (Manitoba)
JudgeMAINELLA JA
Citation2017 MBCA 122
Docket Number20171221
Date21 December 2017

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
54 practice notes
  • R. v. Sharma
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • February 20, 2018
    ...is not necessarily agreement between provincial appellate courts as to what constitutes exceptional circumstances. [88] In R. v. Burnett, 2017 MBCA 122, at paras. 21 to 31, the court observed in part that: [t]he concept of “exceptional circumstances” is a common-law sentencing principle tha......
  • R. v. Parranto
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • November 12, 2021
    ...163; R. v. Johnas (1982), 41 A.R. 183; R. v. Ipeelee, 2012 SCC 13, [2012] 1 S.C.R. 433; R. v. Gladue, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 688; R. v. Burnett, 2017 MBCA 122, 358 C.C.C. (3d) 123; R. v. Proulx, 2000 SCC 5, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 61; R. v. Stewart, 2021 ABCA 79, 21 Alta. L.R. (7th) 213; R. v. Gandour, 20......
  • Aggravating and Mitigating Factors
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Sentencing: Principles and Practice, 2nd Edition
    • May 3, 2024
    ...of pre-sentence reports in Chapter 3, The Sentencing Hearing, Section V. 153 Lacasse, supra note 132 at para 13. See also R v Burnett, 2017 MBCA 122 at para 11; R v Redekopp, 1998 CanLII 1820, [1998] OJ No 5366 (QL) at para 4 (CA), citing Regina v Sears, 1978 CanLII 2277, 39 CCC (2d) 199 at......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Sentencing: Principles and Practice, 2nd Edition
    • May 3, 2024
    ...502 Burke , R v , 2017 ONCA 405 ........................................................... 590 Burnett , R v , 2017 MBCA 122 .......................................................... 137 Burton , R v , 2016 ONC J 103, [2016] OJ No 929 (QL) (Ct J) ................................. 203 Burt......
  • Get Started for Free
55 cases
  • R. v. Sharma
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • February 20, 2018
    ...is not necessarily agreement between provincial appellate courts as to what constitutes exceptional circumstances. [88] In R. v. Burnett, 2017 MBCA 122, at paras. 21 to 31, the court observed in part that: [t]he concept of “exceptional circumstances” is a common-law sentencing principle tha......
  • R. v. Parranto
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • November 12, 2021
    ...163; R. v. Johnas (1982), 41 A.R. 183; R. v. Ipeelee, 2012 SCC 13, [2012] 1 S.C.R. 433; R. v. Gladue, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 688; R. v. Burnett, 2017 MBCA 122, 358 C.C.C. (3d) 123; R. v. Proulx, 2000 SCC 5, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 61; R. v. Stewart, 2021 ABCA 79, 21 Alta. L.R. (7th) 213; R. v. Gandour, 20......
  • R v. Bellows
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • March 20, 2025
    ...a proportionate sentence" by requiring "exceptional circumstances" when departing from a range (Friesen, at paras. 111-12; R. v. Burnett, 2017 MBCA 122, 358 C.C.C. (3d) 123, at para. 26). Departing from a range or starting point is appropriate where required to achieve proportionality. [Emp......
  • R v Braile
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • December 9, 2019
    ...531, [2015] OJ No 3733 (QL); R v Hajar, 2016 ABCA 222, 338 CCC (3d) 477; R v Slizak, 2017 BCCA 279, [2017] BCJ No 1495 (QL); R v Burnett, 2017 MBCA 122, 358 CCC (3d) 123. Most recently see R v Rhude, 2018 ABCA 422 at paras 12 to 14, [2018] AJ No. 1465 (QL) and R v C (DS), 2018 ABCA 335 at p......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Aggravating and Mitigating Factors
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Sentencing: Principles and Practice, 2nd Edition
    • May 3, 2024
    ...of pre-sentence reports in Chapter 3, The Sentencing Hearing, Section V. 153 Lacasse, supra note 132 at para 13. See also R v Burnett, 2017 MBCA 122 at para 11; R v Redekopp, 1998 CanLII 1820, [1998] OJ No 5366 (QL) at para 4 (CA), citing Regina v Sears, 1978 CanLII 2277, 39 CCC (2d) 199 at......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Sentencing: Principles and Practice, 2nd Edition
    • May 3, 2024
    ...502 Burke , R v , 2017 ONCA 405 ........................................................... 590 Burnett , R v , 2017 MBCA 122 .......................................................... 137 Burton , R v , 2016 ONC J 103, [2016] OJ No 929 (QL) (Ct J) ................................. 203 Burt......