R. v. Caissie, 2018 SKQB 279
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | Danyliuk |
| Citation | 2018 SKQB 279 |
| Docket Number | CRM 181 of 2017 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
| Date | 17 October 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
R v Bird,
...SCC 35, [2010] 2 SCR 310. Relatively recent decisions from closer to home include R v Stanley, 2017 SKQB 367 [Stanley] and R v Caissie, 2018 SKQB 279 [78] ......
-
R. v. Caissie, 2019 SKQB 3
...being made by the accused. A voir dire was held to determine the admissibility of those statements. In my earlier written ruling (2018 SKQB 279) I determined the “Mr. Big” statements to be admissible evidence in the trial proper. [4] I commence with a reminder. At the outset of this matter ......
-
R v Caissie,
...Ottenbreit In concurrence: The Honourable Mr. Justice Whitmore The Honourable Mr. Justice Tholl On appeal from: 2018 SKQB 279, Saskatoon 2019 SKQB 3 , Appeal heard: January 10, 2022 Counsel: Ronald Piché for the Appellant Grace Hession David f......
-
R v Rockey,
...reliability of the Accused’s confession. [146] However, I adopt the position articulated in R v Caissie, 2018 SKQB 279 at para 419 Since Hart, cases have held that neither the absence of confirmatory evidence nor the contents of a confession being at odds with......
4 cases
-
R v Bird,
...SCC 35, [2010] 2 SCR 310. Relatively recent decisions from closer to home include R v Stanley, 2017 SKQB 367 [Stanley] and R v Caissie, 2018 SKQB 279 [78] ......
-
R. v. Caissie, 2019 SKQB 3
...being made by the accused. A voir dire was held to determine the admissibility of those statements. In my earlier written ruling (2018 SKQB 279) I determined the “Mr. Big” statements to be admissible evidence in the trial proper. [4] I commence with a reminder. At the outset of this matter ......
-
R v Caissie,
...Ottenbreit In concurrence: The Honourable Mr. Justice Whitmore The Honourable Mr. Justice Tholl On appeal from: 2018 SKQB 279, Saskatoon 2019 SKQB 3 , Appeal heard: January 10, 2022 Counsel: Ronald Piché for the Appellant Grace Hession David f......
-
R v Rockey,
...reliability of the Accused’s confession. [146] However, I adopt the position articulated in R v Caissie, 2018 SKQB 279 at para 419 Since Hart, cases have held that neither the absence of confirmatory evidence nor the contents of a confession being at odds with......