R v Callaghan, 2020 ABPC 208
| Judge | Honourable Judge G.D.M. Stirling |
| Citation | 2020 ABPC 208 |
| Date | 03 November 2020 |
| Court | Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada) |
| Docket Number | 190707513P1 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
R v Arnold,
...the case presently before this Court: Nicholson at paras 33-34. [53] Second, in R v Callaghan, 2020 ABPC 208 at paras 99–101, Stirling, PCJ made the following observations and [99] At the start of the trial, the clerk called the matter of Tim......
-
R v Clarke,
...has been the subject of judicial comment in innumerable cases. I agree with Judge Stirling’s comment in R. v. Callaghan 2020 ABPC 208 at paragraph 61: “The weight to be given to dock identification obviously exists on a continuum. For example, if a brother id......
2 cases
-
R v Arnold,
...the case presently before this Court: Nicholson at paras 33-34. [53] Second, in R v Callaghan, 2020 ABPC 208 at paras 99–101, Stirling, PCJ made the following observations and [99] At the start of the trial, the clerk called the matter of Tim......
-
R v Clarke,
...has been the subject of judicial comment in innumerable cases. I agree with Judge Stirling’s comment in R. v. Callaghan 2020 ABPC 208 at paragraph 61: “The weight to be given to dock identification obviously exists on a continuum. For example, if a brother id......