R. v. Campbell,
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | Wagner, Richard; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Côté, Suzanne; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah; Kasirer, Nicholas; Jamal, Mahmud; O’Bonsawin, Michelle; Moreau, Mary |
| Docket Number | 40465 |
| Date | 06 December 2024 |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2024 SCC 42 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
34 practice notes
-
R. v. Kloubakov, 2025 SCC 25
...and 195.1(1)(c) of the Criminal Code (Man.), [1990] 1 S.C.R. 1123; Godbout v. Longueuil (City), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 844; R. v. Campbell, 2024 SCC 42; R. v. J.F., 2022 SCC 17, [2022] 1 S.C.R. 330; Guindon v. Canada, 2015 SCC 41, [2015] 3 S.C.R. Statutes and Regulations Cited Bill C‑36, An Act to......
-
R v Wright,
...search and seizure. The “main purpose of s. 8 is to protect the right to privacy from unjustified state intrusion” ( R v Campbell, 2024 SCC 42 at para 36 [ Campbell], citing Hunter et al. v Southam Inc., [1984] 2 SCR 145 at 160 [ 44 The right in s. 8 is engaged “where the state conducts a s......
-
R v Kloubakov,
...193 and 195.1(1)(c) of the Criminal Code (Man.), [1990] 1 S.C.R. 1123; Godbout v. Longueuil (City), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 844; R. v. Campbell, 2024 SCC 42; R. v. J.F., 2022 SCC 17, [2022] 1 S.C.R. 330; Guindon v. Canada, 2015 SCC 41, [2015] 3 S.C.R. 3. APPEAL from a judgment of the Alberta Court ......
-
R v Campbell,
...Civil Liberties Association, Trial Lawyers Association of British Columbia and Independent Criminal Defence Advocacy Society Interveners 2024 SCC 42 Present: Wagner C.J. and Karakatsanis, Côté, Rowe, Martin, Kasirer, Jamal, O'Bonsawin and Moreau JJ. DOCKET: 40465 SUPREME COURT OF CANADA Con......
Get Started for Free
27 cases
-
R. v. Kloubakov, 2025 SCC 25
...and 195.1(1)(c) of the Criminal Code (Man.), [1990] 1 S.C.R. 1123; Godbout v. Longueuil (City), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 844; R. v. Campbell, 2024 SCC 42; R. v. J.F., 2022 SCC 17, [2022] 1 S.C.R. 330; Guindon v. Canada, 2015 SCC 41, [2015] 3 S.C.R. Statutes and Regulations Cited Bill C‑36, An Act to......
-
R v Wright,
...search and seizure. The “main purpose of s. 8 is to protect the right to privacy from unjustified state intrusion” ( R v Campbell, 2024 SCC 42 at para 36 [ Campbell], citing Hunter et al. v Southam Inc., [1984] 2 SCR 145 at 160 [ 44 The right in s. 8 is engaged “where the state conducts a s......
-
R v Kloubakov,
...193 and 195.1(1)(c) of the Criminal Code (Man.), [1990] 1 S.C.R. 1123; Godbout v. Longueuil (City), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 844; R. v. Campbell, 2024 SCC 42; R. v. J.F., 2022 SCC 17, [2022] 1 S.C.R. 330; Guindon v. Canada, 2015 SCC 41, [2015] 3 S.C.R. 3. APPEAL from a judgment of the Alberta Court ......
-
R v Campbell,
...Civil Liberties Association, Trial Lawyers Association of British Columbia and Independent Criminal Defence Advocacy Society Interveners 2024 SCC 42 Present: Wagner C.J. and Karakatsanis, Côté, Rowe, Martin, Kasirer, Jamal, O'Bonsawin and Moreau JJ. DOCKET: 40465 SUPREME COURT OF CANADA Con......
Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
-
R. V. Bhatti: Warranted Police Discretion Or Bound By The Warrant?
...ONCA 561, at para.197. 8 Bhatti, at para.52. 9 Bhatti, at para.54, citing, among others,R. v. McGregor,2023 SCC 4;R. v. Campbell,2024 SCC 42. 10 Bhatti, at para.65, a finding which Pomerance J.A. suggests is entitled to 11 Bhatti, at para.81. 12 In addition, it is noteworthy that, if the di......
-
Bill C-2: Expanding The Scope Of Law Enforcement Powers To Obtain Subscriber Information And Other Data
...which would add s. 487.0142 to the Criminal Code. 7. For a recent discussion of the exigent circumstances doctrine, see R. v. Campbell, 2024 SCC 42. To view the original article click The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice......