R. v. Carignan
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Judge | Richard Wagner; Andromache Karakatsanis; Suzanne Côté; Malcolm Rowe; Sheilah Martin; Nicholas Kasirer; Mahmud Jamal; Michelle O’Bonsawin; Mary Moreau |
| Citation | 2025 SCC 43 |
| Docket Number | 41186 |
| Date | 12 December 2025 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
21 practice notes
-
R. v. Froehlich
...v Wilson, 2025 SCC 32 at para 32; Winters v Legal Services Society, 1999 CanLII 656 at para 47, [1999] 3 SCR 160 (SCC); and R v Carignan, 2025 SCC 43 at para 55). [14] In Piekut v Canada (National Revenue), 2025 SCC 13 [Piekut], Jamal J. summarized the modern approach, noting that: (a) the ......
-
Sinclair-Desgagné v. Canada (Chief Electoral Officer)
...2017 QCCS 5229; Placer Dome Canada Ltd. v. Ontario (Minister of Finance), 2006 SCC 20, [2006] 1 S.C.R. 715; R. v. Carignan, 2025 SCC 43; R. v. Kuldip, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 618; Wuttunee v. Whitford, 2023 FCA 18; McEwing v. Canada (Attorney General), 2013 FC 525, [2013] 4 F.C.R. 63; Lorentz v. Su......
-
Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v. Pavic
...statement or published explanation of the amendments that mentioned the impact of the amendments on limitation periods. See R v. Carignan, 2025 SCC 43, at para [62] The plaintiffs relied on the testimony of Professor Audrey Macklin, given to the House of Commons Committee that considered th......
-
Zaitsev v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
...et des droits de la jeunesse) v Directrice de la protection de la jeunesse du CISSS A, 2024 SCC 43 at para 24; see also: R v Carignan, 2025 SCC 43 at para 58; Piekut at para [52] The text of paragraphs 83(1)(f) and (j) does not confer authority on the Minister to withdraw information. When ......
Get Started for Free
20 cases
-
R. v. Froehlich
...v Wilson, 2025 SCC 32 at para 32; Winters v Legal Services Society, 1999 CanLII 656 at para 47, [1999] 3 SCR 160 (SCC); and R v Carignan, 2025 SCC 43 at para 55). [14] In Piekut v Canada (National Revenue), 2025 SCC 13 [Piekut], Jamal J. summarized the modern approach, noting that: (a) the ......
-
Sinclair-Desgagné v. Canada (Chief Electoral Officer)
...2017 QCCS 5229; Placer Dome Canada Ltd. v. Ontario (Minister of Finance), 2006 SCC 20, [2006] 1 S.C.R. 715; R. v. Carignan, 2025 SCC 43; R. v. Kuldip, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 618; Wuttunee v. Whitford, 2023 FCA 18; McEwing v. Canada (Attorney General), 2013 FC 525, [2013] 4 F.C.R. 63; Lorentz v. Su......
-
Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v. Pavic
...statement or published explanation of the amendments that mentioned the impact of the amendments on limitation periods. See R v. Carignan, 2025 SCC 43, at para [62] The plaintiffs relied on the testimony of Professor Audrey Macklin, given to the House of Commons Committee that considered th......
-
Zaitsev v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
...et des droits de la jeunesse) v Directrice de la protection de la jeunesse du CISSS A, 2024 SCC 43 at para 24; see also: R v Carignan, 2025 SCC 43 at para 58; Piekut at para [52] The text of paragraphs 83(1)(f) and (j) does not confer authority on the Minister to withdraw information. When ......
Get Started for Free
