R. v. Carstairs
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Judge | Bauman,Voith,Willcock |
| Citation | 2022 BCCA 69 |
| Date | 23 February 2022 |
| Docket Number | CA47255 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 practice notes
-
R v. Fox
...the evidence” (at para 25). See also R v Santos, 2022 SKCA 50, 413 CCC (3d) 229, R v C.L., 2023 SKCA 58, 426 CCC (3d) 183, R v Carstairs, 2022 BCCA 69 at para 47, 411 CCC (3d) 184, and R v Timmons, 2011 NSCA 39 at paras 50–55, 275 CCC (3d) 59. [251] In this case, the parties led evidence in......
-
Searches and Seizures Authorized by Law 1: Standard Warrant
...that we retain a privacy 122 Saint, above note 80 at para 9, citing R v Coull, 1986 CanLII 4753 at para 12 (BC CA). 123 R v Carstairs, 2022 BCCA 69; R v Lowe, 2018 ONCA 110. 124 Pars Oriental Rug v Canada, [1988] 88 BCJ No 3055, 18 CER 6 (SC). 125 Cornell, above note 117 at para 18. 126 Ibi......
-
Table of cases
...29, 212 R v Cardinal, 2003 BCSC 158 ............................................................................. 165 R v Carstairs, 2022 BCCA 69 .............................................................................. 166 R v Caslake, [1998] 1 SCR 51, 155 DLR (4th) 19 ..............1......
1 cases
-
R v. Fox
...the evidence” (at para 25). See also R v Santos, 2022 SKCA 50, 413 CCC (3d) 229, R v C.L., 2023 SKCA 58, 426 CCC (3d) 183, R v Carstairs, 2022 BCCA 69 at para 47, 411 CCC (3d) 184, and R v Timmons, 2011 NSCA 39 at paras 50–55, 275 CCC (3d) 59. [251] In this case, the parties led evidence in......
2 books & journal articles
-
Searches and Seizures Authorized by Law 1: Standard Warrant
...that we retain a privacy 122 Saint, above note 80 at para 9, citing R v Coull, 1986 CanLII 4753 at para 12 (BC CA). 123 R v Carstairs, 2022 BCCA 69; R v Lowe, 2018 ONCA 110. 124 Pars Oriental Rug v Canada, [1988] 88 BCJ No 3055, 18 CER 6 (SC). 125 Cornell, above note 117 at para 18. 126 Ibi......
-
Table of cases
...29, 212 R v Cardinal, 2003 BCSC 158 ............................................................................. 165 R v Carstairs, 2022 BCCA 69 .............................................................................. 166 R v Caslake, [1998] 1 SCR 51, 155 DLR (4th) 19 ..............1......
