R. v. Chaulk,
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | Dickson, Robert George Brian; Lamer, Antonio; Wilson, Bertha; La Forest, Gérard V.; L'Heureux-Dubé, Claire; Sopinka, John; Gonthier, Charles Doherty; Cory, Peter deCarteret; McLachlin, Beverley |
| Date | 20 December 1990 |
| Citation | [1990] 3 SCR 1303,69 Man R (2d) 161,2 CR (4th) 1,119 NR 161,62 CCC (3d) 193,JE 91-76,EYB 1990-67195,[1990] SCJ No 139 (QL),1990 CanLII 34 (SCC),11 WCB (2d) 558,1 CRR (2d) 1,[1991] 2 WWR 385 |
| Docket Number | 21012, 21035 |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
181 practice notes
-
Rodriguez v. British Columbia (Attorney General) et al., (1993) 158 N.R. 1 (SCC)
...1 S.C.R. 927; 94 N.R. 167; 24 Q.A.C. 2; 58 D.L.R.(4th) 577; 25 C.P.R.(3d) 417, refd to. [para. 192]. R. v. Chaulk and Morrissette, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1303; 119 N.R. 161; 69 Man.R.(2d) 161; [1991] 2 W.W.R. 385; 62 C.C.C.(3d) 193; 1 C.R.R.(2d) 1; 2 C.R.(4th) 1, refd to. [para. Nelles v. Ontario ......
-
R. v. Hynes,
...1120; R. v. Seaboyer, [1991] 2 S.C.R. 577; R. v. Bernard, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 833; R. v. Robinson, [1996] 1 S.C.R. 683; R. v. Chaulk, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1303; R. v. B. (K.G.), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 740; Caccamo v. The Queen, [1976] 1 S.C.R. 786; Skogman v. The Queen, [1984] 2 S.C.R. 93; R. v. O’Connor, ......
-
R. v. McClenaghan (M.A.),
...36 O.A.C. 1, refd to. [para. 142]. R. v. Mulligan, [1977] 1 S.C.R. 612; 9 N.R. 27, refd to. [para. 147]. R. v. Chaulk and Morrissette, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1303; 119 N.R. 161; 69 Man.R.(2d) 161, refd to. [para. 147]. R. v. David (D.) (2002), 164 O.A.C. 61; 169 C.C.C.(3d) 165 (C.A.), refd to. [pa......
-
Teva Canada Ltd. v. TD Canada Trust,
...7479; Sriskandarajah v. United States of America, 2012 SCC 70, [2012] 3 S.C.R. 609; R. v. Bernard, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 833; R. v. Chaulk, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1303; R. v. Henry, 2005 SCC 76, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 609; Ontario (Attorney General) v. Fraser, 2011 SCC 20, [2011] 2 S.C.R. 3; Nishi v. Rascal Tr......
Get Started for Free
95 cases
-
Rodriguez v. British Columbia (Attorney General) et al., (1993) 158 N.R. 1 (SCC)
...1 S.C.R. 927; 94 N.R. 167; 24 Q.A.C. 2; 58 D.L.R.(4th) 577; 25 C.P.R.(3d) 417, refd to. [para. 192]. R. v. Chaulk and Morrissette, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1303; 119 N.R. 161; 69 Man.R.(2d) 161; [1991] 2 W.W.R. 385; 62 C.C.C.(3d) 193; 1 C.R.R.(2d) 1; 2 C.R.(4th) 1, refd to. [para. Nelles v. Ontario ......
-
R. v. Hynes,
...1120; R. v. Seaboyer, [1991] 2 S.C.R. 577; R. v. Bernard, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 833; R. v. Robinson, [1996] 1 S.C.R. 683; R. v. Chaulk, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1303; R. v. B. (K.G.), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 740; Caccamo v. The Queen, [1976] 1 S.C.R. 786; Skogman v. The Queen, [1984] 2 S.C.R. 93; R. v. O’Connor, ......
-
R. v. McClenaghan (M.A.),
...36 O.A.C. 1, refd to. [para. 142]. R. v. Mulligan, [1977] 1 S.C.R. 612; 9 N.R. 27, refd to. [para. 147]. R. v. Chaulk and Morrissette, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1303; 119 N.R. 161; 69 Man.R.(2d) 161, refd to. [para. 147]. R. v. David (D.) (2002), 164 O.A.C. 61; 169 C.C.C.(3d) 165 (C.A.), refd to. [pa......
-
Teva Canada Ltd. v. TD Canada Trust,
...7479; Sriskandarajah v. United States of America, 2012 SCC 70, [2012] 3 S.C.R. 609; R. v. Bernard, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 833; R. v. Chaulk, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1303; R. v. Henry, 2005 SCC 76, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 609; Ontario (Attorney General) v. Fraser, 2011 SCC 20, [2011] 2 S.C.R. 3; Nishi v. Rascal Tr......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 5 9, 2017)
...Collateral Fact Rule, R v WD, [1991] 1 SCR 742, R v Krause, [1986] 2 SCR 466, R v GP (1996), 31 OR 504 (CA), R v Chaulk, [1990] 3 SCR 1303, R v Drake (1970), 1 CCC (2d) 396 (Sask QB), Browne v Dunn (1893), 6 R 87 (HL (Eng)), R v Campbell (1977), 17 OR (2d) 673 (CA), R v TK, 2013 ONCA 257, R......
85 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...313 R v Cawthorne, 2016 SCC 32 ............................................................................. 257 R v Chaulk, [1990] 3 SCR 1303, 62 CCC (3d) 193 .............................................331 R v Chehil, [2013] 3 SCR 220, 2013 SCC 49 ..............................................
-
Notes
...24 CCC (3d) 321 (SCC). 18 R. v. Downey (1992), 72 CCC (3d) 1 (SCC); R. v. Laba (1994), 94 CCC (3d) 385 (SCC). 19 R. v. Chaulk (1990), 62 CCC (3d) 193 at 220–23 (SCC). notes for pages 186–93 20 Kent Roach, Due Process and Victims’ Rights: The New Law and Politics of Criminal Justice (1bronto......
-
Table of cases
...396, 31 CR (4th) 1 ..........213, 215 R v Chase, [1987] 2 SCR 293, 37 CCC (3d) 97, [1987] SCJ No 57 ............. 136, 497 R v Chaulk, [1990] 3 SCR 1303, 62 CCC (3d) 193, 2 CR (4th) 1 .............................................62, 327, 331, 347, 348, 349, 364, 595 R v Chaulk (2007), 257 N......
-
Low Hanging Fruit . . . and Beyond: Canada's Drug Laws Meet the Charter
...[1986] 1 SCR 103 [ Oakes SCC ]. 23 Ibid at para 41. 24 Ibid at para 61, Dickson CJ. 25 R v Keegstra , [1990] 3 SCR 697. 26 R v Chaulk , [1990] 3 SCR 1303. 27 R v Stone , [1999] 2 SCR 290. 28 R v Daviault , [1994] 3 SCR 63. 516 Melvyn Green The NCA search powers were well under attack in lo......
Get Started for Free