R. v. Chaulk

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
JudgeDickson, Robert George Brian; Lamer, Antonio; Wilson, Bertha; La Forest, Gérard V.; L'Heureux-Dubé, Claire; Sopinka, John; Gonthier, Charles Doherty; Cory, Peter deCarteret; McLachlin, Beverley
Citation[1990] 3 SCR 1303,69 Man R (2d) 161,2 CR (4th) 1,119 NR 161,62 CCC (3d) 193,JE 91-76,EYB 1990-67195,[1990] SCJ No 139 (QL),1990 CanLII 34 (SCC),11 WCB (2d) 558,1 CRR (2d) 1,[1991] 2 WWR 385
Date20 December 1990
Docket Number21012, 21035

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
119 practice notes
  • R. v. Daviault (H.)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • September 30, 1994
    ...to. [para. 49]. Director of Public Prosecutions v. Beard, [1920] A.C. 479 (H.L.), consd. [para. 51]. R. v. Chaulk and Morrissette, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1303; 119 N.R. 161; 69 Man.R.(2d) 161, refd to. [para. 63]. R. c. Charest (A.) (1990), 28 Q.A.C. 258; 76 C.R.(3d) 63; 57 C.C.C.(3d) 312 (C.A.), ......
  • Egan and Nesbit v. Canada
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • December 9, 1992
    ...1 S.C.R. 927; 94 N.R. 167; 24 Q.A.C. 2; 58 D.L.R.(4th) 577; 25 C.P.R.(3d) 417, refd to. [para. 144]. R. v. Chaulk and Morrissette, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1303; 119 N.R. 161; 69 Man.R.(2d) 161; [1991] 2 W.W.R. 385; 62 C.C.C.(3d) 193; 1 C.R.R.(2d) 1; 2 C.R.(4th) 1, refd to. [para. Committee for the ......
  • R. v. Kirkpatrick
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • July 29, 2022
    ...Services and Support — Facilities Subsector Bargaining Assn. v. British Columbia, 2007 SCC 27, [2007] 2 S.C.R. 391; R. v. Chaulk, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1303; Police Authority for Huddersfield v. Watson, [1947] 1 K.B. 842; R. v. C. (T.L.), [1994] 2 S.C.R. 1012; R. v. George, [1966] S.C.R. 267; Wal......
  • RJR-MacDonald Inc. et Imperial Tobacco Ltd. v. Canada (Procureur général)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • September 21, 1995
    ...Code, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 1123; 109 N.R. 81; 68 Man.R.(2d) 1; [1990] 4 W.W.R. 481, refd to. [para. 39]. R. v. Chaulk and Morrissette, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1303; 119 N.R. 161; 69 Man.R.(2d) 161, refd to. [para. 39]. Ramsden v. Peterborough (City), [1993] 2 S.C.R. 1084; 156 N.R. 2; 66 O.A.C. 10, refd ......
  • Get Started for Free
94 cases
  • R. v. Daviault (H.)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • September 30, 1994
    ...to. [para. 49]. Director of Public Prosecutions v. Beard, [1920] A.C. 479 (H.L.), consd. [para. 51]. R. v. Chaulk and Morrissette, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1303; 119 N.R. 161; 69 Man.R.(2d) 161, refd to. [para. 63]. R. c. Charest (A.) (1990), 28 Q.A.C. 258; 76 C.R.(3d) 63; 57 C.C.C.(3d) 312 (C.A.), ......
  • Egan and Nesbit v. Canada
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • December 9, 1992
    ...1 S.C.R. 927; 94 N.R. 167; 24 Q.A.C. 2; 58 D.L.R.(4th) 577; 25 C.P.R.(3d) 417, refd to. [para. 144]. R. v. Chaulk and Morrissette, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1303; 119 N.R. 161; 69 Man.R.(2d) 161; [1991] 2 W.W.R. 385; 62 C.C.C.(3d) 193; 1 C.R.R.(2d) 1; 2 C.R.(4th) 1, refd to. [para. Committee for the ......
  • R. v. Kirkpatrick
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • July 29, 2022
    ...Services and Support — Facilities Subsector Bargaining Assn. v. British Columbia, 2007 SCC 27, [2007] 2 S.C.R. 391; R. v. Chaulk, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1303; Police Authority for Huddersfield v. Watson, [1947] 1 K.B. 842; R. v. C. (T.L.), [1994] 2 S.C.R. 1012; R. v. George, [1966] S.C.R. 267; Wal......
  • RJR-MacDonald Inc. et Imperial Tobacco Ltd. v. Canada (Procureur général)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • September 21, 1995
    ...Code, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 1123; 109 N.R. 81; 68 Man.R.(2d) 1; [1990] 4 W.W.R. 481, refd to. [para. 39]. R. v. Chaulk and Morrissette, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1303; 119 N.R. 161; 69 Man.R.(2d) 161, refd to. [para. 39]. Ramsden v. Peterborough (City), [1993] 2 S.C.R. 1084; 156 N.R. 2; 66 O.A.C. 10, refd ......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 5 – 9, 2017)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • June 20, 2017
    ...Collateral Fact Rule, R v WD, [1991] 1 SCR 742, R v Krause, [1986] 2 SCR 466, R v GP (1996), 31 OR 504 (CA), R v Chaulk, [1990] 3 SCR 1303, R v Drake (1970), 1 CCC (2d) 396 (Sask QB), Browne v Dunn (1893), 6 R 87 (HL (Eng)), R v Campbell (1977), 17 OR (2d) 673 (CA), R v TK, 2013 ONCA 257, R......
24 books & journal articles
  • The Criminal Law and the Constitution
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Criminal Law. Seventh Edition
    • August 4, 2018
    ...initiative imposed persuasive burdens on the accused. In the pre- Charter case of R v Sault Ste Marie (City) , 191 188 R v Chaulk (1990), 62 CCC (3d) 193 (SCC). 189 R v Laba (1994), 94 CCC (3d) 385 at 417 (SCC) [ Laba ]. 190 A rational connection between the proven and the presumed fact wou......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Annotated Ontario Mental Health Statutes - Fifth edition
    • June 28, 2022
    ...Charest (1990), 57 C.C.C. (3d) 312, 76 C.R. (3d) 63, [1990] J.Q. no. 405 (C.A.) ..................................... 464 R. v. Chaulk, [1990] 3 SCR 1303, 2 C.R. (4th) 1, [1990] S.C.J. No. 139 .............................................. 462, 463, 537 R. v. Colocho-Romero, [2020] O.J. No.......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Fundamental Justice. Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
    • September 8, 2012
    ...2 51 R v Chase, [1987] 2 SCR 293, 45 DLR (4th) 98, 1987 CanLII 23 ...................... 181 R v Chaulk, [1990] 3 SCR 1303, 62 CCC (3d) 193, [1990] SCJ No 139 ........................................................................... 200–1, 301 R v Chenier (2006), 207 OAC 104, 205 CCC (3d)......
  • The Criminal Law and the Constitution
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Criminal Law. Eighth edition
    • September 1, 2022
    ...burden, even though, as will be seen, it also violates section 11(d) if accompanied by a mandatory presumption. 213 R v Chaulk , [1990] 3 SCR 1303. 214 R v Laba , [1994] 3 SCR 965 [ Laba ]. 215 A rational connection between the proven and the presumed fact would not be suicient under s 11(d......
  • Get Started for Free