R. v. Chehil
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Judge | McLachlin, Beverley; LeBel, Louis; Fish, Morris J.; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Rothstein, Marshall; Cromwell, Thomas Albert; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Wagner, Richard |
| Citation | 2013 SCC 49,[2013] 3 SCR 220,[2013] SCJ No 49 (QL),JE 2013-1694,[2013] EXP 3100,364 DLR (4th) 1,AZ-51004480,301 CCC (3d) 157 |
| Docket Number | 34524 |
| Date | 27 September 2013 |
| Subject Matter | CIVIL RIGHTS,CRIMINAL LAW,POLICE |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
318 practice notes
-
R. v. Butler
...Iain R.W. Hollett Authorities Cited: CASES CITED: R. v. Kang-Brown, 2008 SCC 18, [2008] 1 S.C.R. 456; R. v. Chehil, 2013 SCC 49, [2013] 3 S.C.R. 220; R. v. Grant, 2009 SCC 32, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 353; R. v. Lohrer, 2004 SCC 80, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 732; R. v. Morrissey, 1995 CanLII 3498 (ONCA); R. v......
-
R. v. Beaver
...v. Beaudry, 2007 SCC 5 , [2007] 1 S.C.R. 190 ; R. v. MacKenzie, 2013 SCC 50 , [2013] 3 S.C.R. 250 ; R. v. Chehil, 2013 SCC 49 , [2013] 3 S.C.R. 220; R. v. Golub (1997), 34 O.R. (3d) 743 ; R. v. Canary, 2018 ONCA 304 , 361 C.C.C. (3d) 63 ; R. v. Debot, [1989] 2 S.C.R. 1140 ; Mugeser......
-
R. v. Santos (P.M.)
...161; 51 O.A.C. 351; 70 C.C.C.(3d) 193, refd to. [para. 185]. R. v. Chehil (M.S.) (2013), 448 N.R. 370; 335 N.S.R.(2d) 1; 1060 A.P.R. 1; 301 C.C.C.(3d) 157; 2013 SCC 49, refd to. [para. 187]. R. v. Yeh (K.-P.T.) (2009), 337 Sask.R. 1; 464 W.A.C. 1; 248 C.C.C.(3d) 125; 2009 SKCA 112, refd to.......
-
R. v. Ramelson
...128; R. v. Hamilton, 2005 SCC 47, [2005] 2 S.C.R. 432; R. v. Spencer, 2014 SCC 43, [2014] 2 S.C.R. 212; R. v. Chehil, 2013 SCC 49, [2013] 3 S.C.R. 220; R. v. Stairs, 2022 SCC 11; R. v. Stack, 2022 ONCA 413; R. v. Nelson, 2021 BCCA 192; R. v. Ghotra, 2020 ONCA 373, 455 D.L.R. (4th) 586, aff’......
Get Started for Free
286 cases
-
R. v. Beaver
...v. Beaudry, 2007 SCC 5 , [2007] 1 S.C.R. 190 ; R. v. MacKenzie, 2013 SCC 50 , [2013] 3 S.C.R. 250 ; R. v. Chehil, 2013 SCC 49 , [2013] 3 S.C.R. 220; R. v. Golub (1997), 34 O.R. (3d) 743 ; R. v. Canary, 2018 ONCA 304 , 361 C.C.C. (3d) 63 ; R. v. Debot, [1989] 2 S.C.R. 1140 ; Mugeser......
-
Sivia v. Superintendent of Motor Vehicles (B.C.) et al.
...R. v. Stillman (W.W.D.), [1997] 1 S.C.R. 607; 209 N.R. 81; 185 N.B.R.(2d) 1; 472 A.P.R. 1, refd to. [para. 65]. R. v. Chehil (M.S.), [2013] 3 S.C.R. 220; 448 N.R. 370; 335 N.S.R.(2d) 1; 1060 A.P.R. 1; 2013 SCC 49, refd to. [para. 67]. R. v. A.M., [2008] 1 S.C.R. 569; 373 N.R. 198; 236 O.A.C......
-
Sivia v. Superintendent of Motor Vehicles (B.C.) et al.
...R. v. Stillman (W.W.D.), [1997] 1 S.C.R. 607; 209 N.R. 81; 185 N.B.R.(2d) 1; 472 A.P.R. 1, refd to. [para. 65]. R. v. Chehil (M.S.), [2013] 3 S.C.R. 220; 448 N.R. 370; 335 N.S.R.(2d) 1; 1060 A.P.R. 1; 2013 SCC 49, refd to. [para. 67]. R. v. A.M., [2008] 1 S.C.R. 569; 373 N.R. 198; 236 O.A.C......
-
R. v. Santos (P.M.)
...161; 51 O.A.C. 351; 70 C.C.C.(3d) 193, refd to. [para. 185]. R. v. Chehil (M.S.) (2013), 448 N.R. 370; 335 N.S.R.(2d) 1; 1060 A.P.R. 1; 301 C.C.C.(3d) 157; 2013 SCC 49, refd to. [para. 187]. R. v. Yeh (K.-P.T.) (2009), 337 Sask.R. 1; 464 W.A.C. 1; 248 C.C.C.(3d) 125; 2009 SKCA 112, refd to.......
Get Started for Free
54 books & journal articles
-
The Criminal Law and the Constitution
...scheme did not even require notification after the fact of those who had their conversations electronically recorded. 73 63 R v Chehil , [2013] 3 SCR 220. 64 Goodwin , above note 20. 65 R v Edwards (1996), 104 CCC (3d) 136 (SCC). 66 R v Belnavis (1997), 118 CCC (3d) 405 (SCC); R v Paterson ......
-
Table of Cases
...458 R v Chaulk, [1990] 3 SCR 1303 ...........................................................................452, 515 R v Chehil, [2013] 3 SCR 220 ..................................................................................... 533 R v Chehil, 2013 SCC 49 ....................................
-
The Criminal Law and the Constitution
...recorded. 67 56 R. v. Jarvis (2002), 169 C.C.C. (3d) 1 (S.C.C.). 57 R. v. Nolet , [2010] 1 S.C.R. 851. 58 R. v. Chehil , [2013] 3 S.C.R. 220. 59 R. v. Edwards (1996), 104 C.C.C. (3d) 136 (S.C.C.). 60 R. v. Belnavis (1997), 118 C.C.C. (3d) 405 (S.C.C.). 61 R. v. M.(M.R.) (1998), 129 C.C.C. (......
-
Table of cases
...257 R v Chaulk, [1990] 3 SCR 1303, 62 CCC (3d) 193 .............................................331 R v Chehil, [2013] 3 SCR 220, 2013 SCC 49 .......................................................314 R v Chief (1989), 51 CCC (3d) 265 (YTCA) .......................................................
Get Started for Free
