R. v Chen,
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Honourable Mr. Justice Schultes |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 BCSC 882 |
| Citation | 2021 BCSC 882 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Docket Number | 2021bcsc882 |
| Date | 01 January 0001 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
R. v. P.R.J.,
...of the Criminal Code, as it then stood, did not preclude a conditional sentence in light of the constitutional ruling in R. v. Chen, 2021 BCSC 882. (Section 742.1(c) has since been amended and would no longer preclude a conditional sentence for PRJ’s offence: An Act to amend the......
-
R v Samadi,
...s. 742.1(c) had been found to violate s. 7 of the Charter and declared of no force and effect: R. v. Chen, 2021 BCSC 697(s. 7 ruling), 2021 BCSC 882 (s. 1 ruling). As a result, sentencing proceeded on the basis that a conditional sentence of imprisonment was a disposition open to the senten......
2 cases
-
R. v. P.R.J.,
...of the Criminal Code, as it then stood, did not preclude a conditional sentence in light of the constitutional ruling in R. v. Chen, 2021 BCSC 882. (Section 742.1(c) has since been amended and would no longer preclude a conditional sentence for PRJ’s offence: An Act to amend the......
-
R v Samadi,
...s. 742.1(c) had been found to violate s. 7 of the Charter and declared of no force and effect: R. v. Chen, 2021 BCSC 697(s. 7 ruling), 2021 BCSC 882 (s. 1 ruling). As a result, sentencing proceeded on the basis that a conditional sentence of imprisonment was a disposition open to the senten......