R. v. Chouhan,

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
JudgeWagner, Richard; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah; Kasirer, Nicholas
Neutral Citation2021 SCC 26
Citation2021 SCC 26
Date25 June 2021
Docket Number39062
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • Pinpointing Parliament: Supreme Court Citation of Parliamentary Evidence, 2010-2020.
    • Canada
    • Canadian Parliamentary Review Vol. 45 No. 4, December 2022
    • December 22, 2022
    ...can be cited in more than one set of reasons within a judgment. A shining example is from just beyond the study period: R. v. Chouhan, 2021 SCC 26. Chouhan has five sets of reasons. A single page of Hansard is cited in four of those reasons; eight different paragraphs of the judgement cite ......
  • R v Korca,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 24, 2023
    ...of impartiality will be displaced, and how far the parties may go in the questions that are asked on a challenge for cause: R v Chouhan, 2021 SCC 26 para 62. 14 The question then is whether there is a realistic potential for partiality on the part of jurors based on any or all of the follow......
  • R. v. Gala-Nyam,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • April 12, 2023
    ...jury selection process, the Supreme Court of Canada has recently recognized the importance of this self-reflective process: R. v. Chouhan, 2021 SCC 26 (S.C.C.) at paras. 49, 54, and 59. A capacity for introspection is indispensable. This varies a good deal from person to person. The reflect......
2 cases
  • R v Korca,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 24, 2023
    ...of impartiality will be displaced, and how far the parties may go in the questions that are asked on a challenge for cause: R v Chouhan, 2021 SCC 26 para 62. 14 The question then is whether there is a realistic potential for partiality on the part of jurors based on any or all of the follow......
  • R. v. Gala-Nyam,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • April 12, 2023
    ...jury selection process, the Supreme Court of Canada has recently recognized the importance of this self-reflective process: R. v. Chouhan, 2021 SCC 26 (S.C.C.) at paras. 49, 54, and 59. A capacity for introspection is indispensable. This varies a good deal from person to person. The reflect......
1 books & journal articles
  • Pinpointing Parliament: Supreme Court Citation of Parliamentary Evidence, 2010-2020.
    • Canada
    • Canadian Parliamentary Review Vol. 45 Nbr. 4, December 2022
    • December 22, 2022
    ...can be cited in more than one set of reasons within a judgment. A shining example is from just beyond the study period: R. v. Chouhan, 2021 SCC 26. Chouhan has five sets of reasons. A single page of Hansard is cited in four of those reasons; eight different paragraphs of the judgement cite ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT