R v. Chung
| Jurisdiction | Alberta |
| Court | Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Citation | 2024 ABKB 96 |
| Docket Number | 160963161Q1 |
| Date | 20 February 2024 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 practice notes
-
R v. Chung
...47 days. Many issues were addressed, including those discussed in 2023 ABKB 314 (Disclosure and Witness Protection Program Records), 2024 ABKB 96 (Voir Dire 2, Amisk Traffic Stop), 2024 ABKB 91 (Voir Dire 6, ERC Calls), 2024 ABKB 93 (Voir Dire 7, Pocket Dial Evidence), 2024 ABKB 564 ......
-
R v. Habte
...is still a high threshold to establish that a warrant should be quashed under the residual category: Paryniuk, at para 62; R v Chung, 2024 ABKB 96, at para 217. For the reasons discussed above, that standard is not met Application to Exclude Evidence – Section 24(2) Charter [136]  ......
-
R v. Chung
...seizures were illegal. Authorization was drawn from s 487.11 and 489(2) of the Criminal Code or the Waterfield doctrine. See R v Chung, 2024 ABKB 96 at paras 95-122; R v Barton, 2024 ABCA 34 at paras (a) Michael Parent (i) The Seizure [112] S/Sgt. Sloan seized Mr. Parent’s cellphone. S/Sgt.......
3 cases
-
R v. Chung
...47 days. Many issues were addressed, including those discussed in 2023 ABKB 314 (Disclosure and Witness Protection Program Records), 2024 ABKB 96 (Voir Dire 2, Amisk Traffic Stop), 2024 ABKB 91 (Voir Dire 6, ERC Calls), 2024 ABKB 93 (Voir Dire 7, Pocket Dial Evidence), 2024 ABKB 564 ......
-
R v. Habte
...is still a high threshold to establish that a warrant should be quashed under the residual category: Paryniuk, at para 62; R v Chung, 2024 ABKB 96, at para 217. For the reasons discussed above, that standard is not met Application to Exclude Evidence – Section 24(2) Charter [136]  ......
-
R v. Chung
...seizures were illegal. Authorization was drawn from s 487.11 and 489(2) of the Criminal Code or the Waterfield doctrine. See R v Chung, 2024 ABKB 96 at paras 95-122; R v Barton, 2024 ABCA 34 at paras (a) Michael Parent (i) The Seizure [112] S/Sgt. Sloan seized Mr. Parent’s cellphone. S/Sgt.......
