R. v. Clyke,
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Judge | Rouleau, van Rensburg and Huscroft JJ.A. |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 ONCA 810 |
| Citation | 2021 ONCA 810 |
| Date | 16 November 2021 |
| Docket Number | C66622 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
2023 ABCA 10,
...149 AR 199 at para 29; R v Mack, 2012 ABCA 42 at paras 57-59, 522 AR 262, appeal dismissed 2014 SCC 58, [2014] 3 SCR 3; R v Clyke, 2021 ONCA 810 at paras 32-37, and paras 43-44 (“While each case falls to be decided on its own facts, a non-exhaustive list of factors to be considered i......
-
R v Bruzzese,
...misstates the evidence or misuses the evidence in connection with the inferences to be drawn”: Rose, at para. 124; R. v. Clyke, 2021 ONCA 810, 158 O.R. (3d) 641, at para. 39; R. v. Jones, 2011 ONCA 584, 277 C.C.C. (3d) 143, at para. 38; R. v. Welsh, 2013 ONCA 190, 115 O.R. (3d) 81, a......
-
2023 ONCA 300,
...misstates the evidence or misuses the evidence in connection with the inferences to be drawn”: Rose, at para. 124; R. v. Clyke, 2021 ONCA 810, 158 O.R. (3d) 641, at para. 39; R. v. Jones, 2011 ONCA 584, 277 C.C.C. (3d) 143, at para. 38; R. v. Welsh, 2013 ONCA 190, 115 O.R. (3d) 81, a......
3 cases
-
2023 ABCA 10,
...149 AR 199 at para 29; R v Mack, 2012 ABCA 42 at paras 57-59, 522 AR 262, appeal dismissed 2014 SCC 58, [2014] 3 SCR 3; R v Clyke, 2021 ONCA 810 at paras 32-37, and paras 43-44 (“While each case falls to be decided on its own facts, a non-exhaustive list of factors to be considered i......
-
R v Bruzzese,
...misstates the evidence or misuses the evidence in connection with the inferences to be drawn”: Rose, at para. 124; R. v. Clyke, 2021 ONCA 810, 158 O.R. (3d) 641, at para. 39; R. v. Jones, 2011 ONCA 584, 277 C.C.C. (3d) 143, at para. 38; R. v. Welsh, 2013 ONCA 190, 115 O.R. (3d) 81, a......
-
2023 ONCA 300,
...misstates the evidence or misuses the evidence in connection with the inferences to be drawn”: Rose, at para. 124; R. v. Clyke, 2021 ONCA 810, 158 O.R. (3d) 641, at para. 39; R. v. Jones, 2011 ONCA 584, 277 C.C.C. (3d) 143, at para. 38; R. v. Welsh, 2013 ONCA 190, 115 O.R. (3d) 81, a......