R. v. Cortes Rivera, 2020 SCC 44
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah; Kasirer, Nicholas |
| Citation | 2020 SCC 44 |
| Date | 11 December 2020 |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Docket Number | 39084 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
R. v. T.J.F.,
...SCC 34; R. v. Slatter, 2020 SCC 36; R. v. Delmas, 2020 SCC 39; R. v. Mehari, 2020 SCC 40, R. v. W.M., 2020 SCC 42 and R. v. Cortes Rivera, 2020 SCC 44) reminding appeal courts of the considerable deference owed to findings of credibility made by trial [46] Thes......
-
R v Settle,
...of opinion in V(R) can be characterized as turning on the “substantial wrong” prong of s 686(1)(b)(iii) CCC. · In R v Cortes Rivera, 2020 SCC 44 at para 1, 453 DLR (4th) 384, the issue also touched on error in restriction of cross-examination of a complainant on prior sexual activity but “t......
-
R. v. Drysdale,
...Delmas, 2020 SCC 39; R. v. Mehari, 2020 SCC 40, R. v. W.M., 2020 SCC 42 and R. v. Cortes Rivera, 2020 SCC 44) reminding appeal courts of the considerable deference owed to findings of credibility made by trial 46 These Supreme Court of Canada dec......
-
R. v. Gerrard,
...SCC 34; R. v. Slatter, 2020 SCC 36; R. v. Delmas, 2020 SCC 39; R. v. Mehari, 2020 SCC 40, R. v. W.M., 2020 SCC 42 and R. v. Cortes Rivera, 2020 SCC 44) reminding appeal courts of the considerable deference owed to findings of credibility made by trial judges. [46] &#x......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
R. v. T.J.F.,
...SCC 34; R. v. Slatter, 2020 SCC 36; R. v. Delmas, 2020 SCC 39; R. v. Mehari, 2020 SCC 40, R. v. W.M., 2020 SCC 42 and R. v. Cortes Rivera, 2020 SCC 44) reminding appeal courts of the considerable deference owed to findings of credibility made by trial [46] Thes......
-
R v Settle,
...of opinion in V(R) can be characterized as turning on the “substantial wrong” prong of s 686(1)(b)(iii) CCC. · In R v Cortes Rivera, 2020 SCC 44 at para 1, 453 DLR (4th) 384, the issue also touched on error in restriction of cross-examination of a complainant on prior sexual activity but “t......
-
R. v. Drysdale,
...Delmas, 2020 SCC 39; R. v. Mehari, 2020 SCC 40, R. v. W.M., 2020 SCC 42 and R. v. Cortes Rivera, 2020 SCC 44) reminding appeal courts of the considerable deference owed to findings of credibility made by trial 46 These Supreme Court of Canada dec......
-
R. v. Gerrard,
...SCC 34; R. v. Slatter, 2020 SCC 36; R. v. Delmas, 2020 SCC 39; R. v. Mehari, 2020 SCC 40, R. v. W.M., 2020 SCC 42 and R. v. Cortes Rivera, 2020 SCC 44) reminding appeal courts of the considerable deference owed to findings of credibility made by trial judges. [46] &#x......
Request a trial to view additional results