R. v. Cutknife (C.K.), (2000) 272 A.R. 172 (QB)
Judge | Marceau, J. |
Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
Case Date | August 24, 2000 |
Citations | (2000), 272 A.R. 172 (QB) |
R. v. Cutknife (C.K.) (2000), 272 A.R. 172 (QB)
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [2000] A.R. TBEd. OC.001
Her Majesty The Queen (respondent) v. Clark Kenneth Cutknife (appellant)
(00120002S2)
Indexed As: R. v. Cutknife (C.K.)
Alberta Court of Queen's Bench
Judicial District of Wetaskiwin
Marceau, J.
August 24, 2000.
Summary:
The accused appealed his conviction for breathalyzer refusal on the ground that his right to counsel was violated.
The Alberta Court of Queen's Bench allowed the appeal and quashed the conviction.
Civil Rights - Topic 4602
Right to counsel - General - Denial of or interference with - Evidence taken inadmissible - [See Civil Rights - Topic 4604 ].
Civil Rights - Topic 4604
Right to counsel - General - Denial of or interference with - What constitutes - The accused appealed his conviction for breathalyzer refusal on the ground that his right to counsel was violated - The Alberta Court of Queen's Bench allowed the appeal, excluded the evidence of the refusal and quashed the conviction - The police constable initially read the accused a proper Charter notice indicating clearly that he had the right to counsel - The police constable also went almost to extremes to persuade the accused to contact counsel - However, the accused's right to counsel was not explained to him after his counsel of choice could not be reached, contrary to R. v. Prosper (S.C.C.).
Civil Rights - Topic 4610
Right to counsel - General - Impaired driving - Demand for breath or blood sample - [See Civil Rights - Topic 4604 ].
Civil Rights - Topic 4617.1
Right to counsel - General - Notice of - Sufficiency of - [See Civil Rights - Topic 4604 ].
Cases Noticed:
R. v. Dwernychuk (M.K.) (1992), 135 A.R. 31; 33 W.A.C. 31; 77 C.C.C.(3d) 385 (C.A.), leave to appeal refused (1993), 151 N.R. 400; 141 A.R. 317; 46 W.A.C. 317; 79 C.C.C.(3d) (vi) (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 3].
R. v. Mide (E.B.) (1998), 233 A.R. 84 (Prov. Ct.), refd to. [para. 5].
R. v. Prosper, [1994] 3 S.C.R. 236; 172 N.R. 161; 133 N.S.R.(2d) 321; 380 A.P.R. 321; 92 C.C.C.(3d) 353; 118 D.L.R.(4th) 154; 33 C.R.(4th) 85; 6 M.V.R.(3d) 181, refd to. [para. 10].
R. v. Lavallee (N.) (1999), 256 A.R. 346 (Prov. Ct.), refd to. [para. 23].
Counsel:
A. Tralenberg, for the appellant;
D.A. Labrenz, for the respondent.
This appeal was heard and granted on August 24, 2000, by Marceau, J., of the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench, Judicial District of Wetaskiwin. Marceau, J., delivered the following written reasons on September 15, 2000.
To continue reading
Request your trial