R. v. Cyr-Langlois,

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeWagner, Richard; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Gascon, Clément; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah
Citation2018 SCC 54
Docket Number37760
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Date06 December 2018
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
15 practice notes
  • R. v. Tayo Tompouba, 2024 SCC 16
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • May 3, 2024
    ...Tran, [1994] 2 S.C.R. 951; Wildman v. The Queen, [1984] 2 S.C.R. 311; R. v. Jolivet, 2000 SCC 29, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 751; R. v. Cyr-Langlois, 2018 SCC 54, [2018] 3 S.C.R. 456; R. v. Trochym, 2007 SCC 6, [2007] 1 S.C.R. 239; R. v. O’Brien, 2011 SCC 29, [2011] 2 S.C.R. 485; R. v. Khill, 2021 SCC......
  • R v Tayo Tompouba,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • May 3, 2024
    ...Tran, [1994] 2 S.C.R. 951; Wildman v. The Queen, [1984] 2 S.C.R. 311; R. v. Jolivet, 2000 SCC 29, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 751; R. v. Cyr-Langlois, 2018 SCC 54, [2018] 3 S.C.R. 456; R. v. Trochym, 2007 SCC 6, [2007] 1 S.C.R. 239; R. v. O'Brien, 2011 SCC 29, [2011] 2 S.C.R. 485; R. v. Khill, 2021 SCC......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Impaired Driving and Other Criminal Code Driving Offences, 2nd Edition
    • May 2, 2023
    ...534 Cyr-Langlois, R c , 2017 QCCA 1033 ..............................................335 Cyr-Langlois, R v , 2018 SCC 54 .................................................335 Daly, R v , 2013 SKPC 40 ...................................................... 484 Daniels, R v , 1990 CanLII 797, 6......
  • Proving Blood Alcohol Concentration Through Breath Samples: Approved Instruments and Certified Evidence
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Impaired Driving and Other Criminal Code Driving Offences, 2nd Edition
    • May 2, 2023
    ...there can be no scientifically valid reasonable doubt as to whether the individual had a BAC above the limit. 33 29 R v Cyr-Langlois , 2018 SCC 54 . 30 See the Quebec Court of Appeal’s judgment in Cyr-Langlois c R , 2017 QCCA 1033 at para 30. 31 R v Cyr-Langlois , supra note 29 at para 4. 3......
  • Get Started for Free
11 cases
  • R. v. Tayo Tompouba, 2024 SCC 16
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • May 3, 2024
    ...Tran, [1994] 2 S.C.R. 951; Wildman v. The Queen, [1984] 2 S.C.R. 311; R. v. Jolivet, 2000 SCC 29, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 751; R. v. Cyr-Langlois, 2018 SCC 54, [2018] 3 S.C.R. 456; R. v. Trochym, 2007 SCC 6, [2007] 1 S.C.R. 239; R. v. O’Brien, 2011 SCC 29, [2011] 2 S.C.R. 485; R. v. Khill, 2021 SCC......
  • R v Tayo Tompouba,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • May 3, 2024
    ...Tran, [1994] 2 S.C.R. 951; Wildman v. The Queen, [1984] 2 S.C.R. 311; R. v. Jolivet, 2000 SCC 29, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 751; R. v. Cyr-Langlois, 2018 SCC 54, [2018] 3 S.C.R. 456; R. v. Trochym, 2007 SCC 6, [2007] 1 S.C.R. 239; R. v. O'Brien, 2011 SCC 29, [2011] 2 S.C.R. 485; R. v. Khill, 2021 SCC......
  • R v Garcia, 2019 ABPC 6
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 10, 2019
    ...The Court specifically concerned the requirements needed to raise a reasonable doubt as to the presumption of accuracy in R v Cyr-Langlois 2018 SCC 54. Binding principles from that case It is settled that in order to rebut the presumptions of identity and accuracy in s. 258(1)(c) the accuse......
  • R. v. Hunt, 2020 ONCJ 627
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada)
    • June 1, 2020
    ...the testing of blood is different from the testing of BAC, the legal principles developed by the Supreme Court in R. v. Cyr-Langlois, 2018 SCC 54, on how to evaluate this argument are instructive. In Cyr-Langlois, supra, the Supreme Court was clear that a reasonable doubt cannot arise from ......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • Rebutting The Breathalyzer Presumptions
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • January 9, 2019
    ...a similar approach will be taken with respect to the evaluative procedures that will be implemented for drug-impaired driving. Footnotes 2018 SCC 54 [Cyr-Langlois]. Criminal Code, RSC 1985, c C-46. R v St-Onge Lamoureux, 2012 SCC 57 at para 6 [St-Onge]. Ibid. St-Onge, supra note 3. Cyr-Lang......
2 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Impaired Driving and Other Criminal Code Driving Offences, 2nd Edition
    • May 2, 2023
    ...534 Cyr-Langlois, R c , 2017 QCCA 1033 ..............................................335 Cyr-Langlois, R v , 2018 SCC 54 .................................................335 Daly, R v , 2013 SKPC 40 ...................................................... 484 Daniels, R v , 1990 CanLII 797, 6......
  • Proving Blood Alcohol Concentration Through Breath Samples: Approved Instruments and Certified Evidence
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Impaired Driving and Other Criminal Code Driving Offences, 2nd Edition
    • May 2, 2023
    ...there can be no scientifically valid reasonable doubt as to whether the individual had a BAC above the limit. 33 29 R v Cyr-Langlois , 2018 SCC 54 . 30 See the Quebec Court of Appeal’s judgment in Cyr-Langlois c R , 2017 QCCA 1033 at para 30. 31 R v Cyr-Langlois , supra note 29 at para 4. 3......