R. v. D.J.S.,
Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
Judge | Newbury,Saunders,Willcock |
Neutral Citation | 2015 BCCA 111 |
Citation | 2015 BCCA 111,(2015), 370 B.C.A.C. 57 (CA),370 BCAC 57,(2015), 370 BCAC 57 (CA),370 B.C.A.C. 57 |
Date | 20 February 2015 |
Subject Matter | CRIMINAL LAW |
R. v. D.J.S. (2015), 370 B.C.A.C. 57 (CA);
635 W.A.C. 57
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [2015] B.C.A.C. TBEd. MR.042
Regina (appellant) v. D.J.S. (respondent)
(CA041809; 2015 BCCA 111)
Indexed As: R. v. D.J.S.
British Columbia Court of Appeal
Newbury, Saunders and Willcock, JJ.A
March 17, 2015.
Summary:
The accused was convicted of two charges of sexual assault. The Crown pursued a dangerous offender application.
The British Columbia Supreme Court, in a decision with neutral citation 2014 BCSC 819, found the accused to be a dangerous offender and imposed a determinate sentence of 48 months for one of the offences and a consecutive sentence of 36 months for the second offence. He also received credit for time served. The Crown appealed the imposition of a determinate, as opposed to indeterminate, sentence.
The British Columbia Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, set aside the determinate sentences, and imposed a sentence of detention in a penitentiary for an indeterminate period.
Editor's Note: Certain names in the following case have been initialized or the case otherwise edited to prevent the disclosure of identities where required by law, publication ban, Maritime Law Book's editorial policy or otherwise. In this case, the ban was imposed under s. 486.4 of the Criminal Code restricting publication or identifying information relating to a complainant or witness and applies indefinitely unless otherwise ordered by the court.
Criminal Law - Topic 5659
Punishments (sentence) - Imprisonment and parole - Term of imprisonment - Indeterminate - See paragraphs 32 to 38.
Criminal Law - Topic 6516
Dangerous or long-offenders - Detention (incl. common law preventive detention) - General - Appeals - Scope of - See paragraphs 26 to 31.
Criminal Law - Topic 6576
Dangerous or long-term offenders - Detention - Sentencing - Indeterminate vs. determinate sentence - See paragraphs 32 to 38.
Cases Noticed:
R. v. Walsh (R.J.), [2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1911; 2011 BCSC 1911, refd to. [para. 18].
R. v. Shanoss (J.N.), [2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 2335; 2013 BCSC 2335, refd to. [para. 18].
R. v. Hartling (E.J.), [2005] O.T.C. 109 (Sup. Ct.), refd to. [para. 18].
R. v. Muir (J.S.) (2003), 177 B.C.A.C. 246; 291 W.A.C. 246; 2003 BCCA 66, refd to. [para. 26].
R. v. Biniaris (J.), [2000] 1 S.C.R. 381; 252 N.R. 204; 134 B.C.A.C. 161; 219 W.A.C. 161; 2000 SCC 15, refd to. [para. 26].
R. v. Higginbottom (C.) (2001), 150 O.A.C. 79; 156 C.C.C.(3d) 178 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 27].
Housen v. Nikolaisen et al., [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235; 286 N.R. 1; 219 Sask.R. 1; 272 W.A.C. 1; 2002 SCC 33, refd to. [para. 28].
R. v. Dagenais (R.A.) (2003), 339 A.R. 132; 312 W.A.C. 132; 2003 ABCA 376, refd to. [para. 29].
R. v. Racher (B.A.), [2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1313; 2011 BCSC 1313, refd to. [para. 30].
R. v. Osborne (C.G.) (2014), 306 Man.R.(2d) 276; 604 W.A.C. 276; 2014 MBCA 73, refd to. [para. 30].
R. v. J.M.H., [2011] 3 S.C.R. 197; 421 N.R. 76; 283 O.A.C. 379; 2011 SCC 45, refd to. [para. 31].
Counsel:
M.J. Brundrett, for the appellant;
L. Helps, for the respondent.
This appeal was heard in Vancouver, B.C., on February 20, 2015, before Newbury, Saunders and Willcock, JJ.A., of the British Columbia Court of Appeal. The decision of the court was delivered by Newbury, J.A., on March 17, 2015.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
British Columbia Teachers' Federation v. British Columbia, 2015 BCCA 184
...v. Nikolaisen et al., [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235; 286 N.R. 1; 219 Sask.R. 1; 272 W.A.C. 1; 2002 SCC 33, refd to. [para. 176]. R. v. D.J.S. (2015), 370 B.C.A.C. 57; 635 W.A.C. 57; 2015 BCCA 111, refd to. [para. H.L. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., [2005] 1 S.C.R. 401; 333 N.R. 1; 262 Sask.R. 1......
-
R. v. Boutilier (D.J.), 2015 BCSC 901
...word "onus" in the above quotation, but otherwise adopt the statement. See also R. v. Bunn , 2014 SKCA 112 at para. 46; R. v. D.J.S. , 2015 BCCA 111 at para. 30. [159] The issue of Mr. Boutilier's future conduct, including his amenability to treatment, was specifically addressed in the evid......
-
R. v. Patel, 2020 BCCA 92
...A “reasonable expectation” is a belief that something will happen, as opposed to the mere possibility it may happen: R. v. D.J.S., 2015 BCCA 111 at para. 30; R. v. Osborne, 2014 MBCA 73 at paras. [178] Dr. Tomita’s opinion that federal supervision offered the best hope falls short of a reas......
-
R. v. Toutsaint (J.), (2015) 467 Sask.R. 248 (CA)
...refd to. [para. 13]. R. v. Goforth (M.A.) (2007), 302 Sask.R. 265; 411 W.A.C. 265; 2007 SKCA 144, refd to. [para. 14]. R. v. D.J.S. (2015), 370 B.C.A.C. 57; 635 W.A.C. 57; 2015 BCCA 111, refd to. [para. R. v. Osborne (C.G.) (2014), 306 Man.R.(2d) 276; 604 W.A.C. 276; 2014 MBCA 73, refd to. ......
-
British Columbia Teachers' Federation v. British Columbia, 2015 BCCA 184
...v. Nikolaisen et al., [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235; 286 N.R. 1; 219 Sask.R. 1; 272 W.A.C. 1; 2002 SCC 33, refd to. [para. 176]. R. v. D.J.S. (2015), 370 B.C.A.C. 57; 635 W.A.C. 57; 2015 BCCA 111, refd to. [para. H.L. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., [2005] 1 S.C.R. 401; 333 N.R. 1; 262 Sask.R. 1......
-
R. v. Boutilier (D.J.), 2015 BCSC 901
...word "onus" in the above quotation, but otherwise adopt the statement. See also R. v. Bunn , 2014 SKCA 112 at para. 46; R. v. D.J.S. , 2015 BCCA 111 at para. 30. [159] The issue of Mr. Boutilier's future conduct, including his amenability to treatment, was specifically addressed in the evid......
-
R. v. Toutsaint (J.), (2015) 467 Sask.R. 248 (CA)
...refd to. [para. 13]. R. v. Goforth (M.A.) (2007), 302 Sask.R. 265; 411 W.A.C. 265; 2007 SKCA 144, refd to. [para. 14]. R. v. D.J.S. (2015), 370 B.C.A.C. 57; 635 W.A.C. 57; 2015 BCCA 111, refd to. [para. R. v. Osborne (C.G.) (2014), 306 Man.R.(2d) 276; 604 W.A.C. 276; 2014 MBCA 73, refd to. ......
-
R. v. Tom, 2017 BCSC 452
...that something will happen and, as opposed to a "reasonable possibility" of eventual control of the risk in the community: R. v. D.J.S., 2015 BCCA 111 at para. [326] Second, s. 753(4.1) does not impose a burden or onus on the offender but simply requires an evidentiary basis to meet the sta......