R. v. Delmas, 2020 SCC 39
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell; Martin, Sheilah; Kasirer, Nicholas |
| Citation | 2020 SCC 39 |
| Docket Number | 39163 |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Date | 02 December 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
27 practice notes
-
R. v. Kruk, 2024 SCC 7
...2019 SCC 6, [2019] 1 S.C.R. 301; R. v. Munoz (2006), 86 O.R. (3d) 134; R. v. Delmas, 2020 ABCA 152, 452 D.L.R. (4th) 375, aff’d 2020 SCC 39, [2020] 3 S.C.R. 780; R. v. R.R., 2018 ABCA 287, 366 C.C.C. (3d) 293; R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484; R. v. Kiss, 2018 ONCA 184; R. v. Ade......
-
R v Kruk,
...v. Calnen, 2019 SCC 6, [2019] 1 S.C.R. 301; R. v. Munoz (2006), 86 O.R. (3d) 134; R. v. Delmas, 2020 ABCA 152, 452 D.L.R. (4th) 375, aff'd 2020 SCC 39, [2020] 3 S.C.R. 780; R. v. R.R., 2018 ABCA 287, 366 C.C.C. (3d) 293; R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484; R. v. Kiss, 2018 ONCA 184; R. v.......
-
R. v. T.J.F.,
...released several brief oral decisions (R. v. Langan, 2020 SCC 33; R. v. Kishayinew, 2020 SCC 34; R. v. Slatter, 2020 SCC 36; R. v. Delmas, 2020 SCC 39; R. v. Mehari, 2020 SCC 40, R. v. W.M., 2020 SCC 42 and R. v. Cortes Rivera, 2020 SCC 44) reminding appeal courts of the considerable defere......
-
R v Mela,
...the entire context is considered: R v Quartey, 2018 SCC 59, [2018] 3 SCR 687; R v Demedeiros, 2019 SCC 11, [2019] 1 SCR 568; R v Delmas, 2020 SCC 39, [2020] SCJ No 39 (QL); R v Langan, 2020 SCC 33, [2020] SCJ No 33 (QL); R v Kishayinew, 2020 SCC 34, [2020] SCJ No 34 (QL); [33] Finally, this......
Request a trial to view additional results
25 cases
-
R. v. T.J.F.,
...released several brief oral decisions (R. v. Langan, 2020 SCC 33; R. v. Kishayinew, 2020 SCC 34; R. v. Slatter, 2020 SCC 36; R. v. Delmas, 2020 SCC 39; R. v. Mehari, 2020 SCC 40, R. v. W.M., 2020 SCC 42 and R. v. Cortes Rivera, 2020 SCC 44) reminding appeal courts of the considerable defere......
-
R v Mela,
...the entire context is considered: R v Quartey, 2018 SCC 59, [2018] 3 SCR 687; R v Demedeiros, 2019 SCC 11, [2019] 1 SCR 568; R v Delmas, 2020 SCC 39, [2020] SCJ No 39 (QL); R v Langan, 2020 SCC 33, [2020] SCJ No 33 (QL); R v Kishayinew, 2020 SCC 34, [2020] SCJ No 34 (QL); [33] Finally, this......
-
R v Dirksen,
...after the trial judgment, so the trial judge did not have the benefit of these decisions: see also R v Delmas, 2020 ABCA 152 (aff’d 2020 SCC 39). [63] The more fundamental problem with Mr. Dirksen’s argument on this point is his inability to categorize the evidence of L.B. flashing her brea......
-
Schuetze v. Pyper,
...assumptions or stereotypes about how people behave in particular circumstances (see: R. v. Delmas, 2020 ABCA 152 at para. 31, aff’d 2020 SCC 39). For the same reasons, I reject any suggestion by Mr. Pyper that his allegations about Ms. Schuetze becoming “dysregulated......
Request a trial to view additional results