R. v. Demedeiros, 2018 ABCA 241
| Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Ronald Berger; The Honourable Mr. Justice Peter Costigan; The Honourable Mr. Justice Frans Slatter |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Case Date | July 06, 2018 |
| Jurisdiction | Alberta |
| Citations | 2018 ABCA 241 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
36 practice notes
-
Rules Relating to the Use of Admissible Evidence
...Statements.” 20 Zou , above note 18 at paras 40–43. See also R v Qhasimy , 2018 ABCA 228 at paras 9–11. See also R v Demedeiros , 2018 ABCA 241 at para 89, aff’d [2019] 1 SCR 568. And see R v Magno , 2015 ONCA 111 at paras 42–43 [ Magno ]. 21 With respect to terminology, the Ontario Court o......
-
Table of cases
...OF EVIDENCE 722 R v Delorme, 2005 NWTSC 34 ...................................................................326, 331 R v Demedeiros, 2018 ABCA 241, aff’d [2019] 1 SCR 568 ................................. 675 R v Demeter, [1978] 1 SCR 538 ........................................................
-
R v Delmas, 2020 ABCA 152
...to deference unless palpable and overriding error can be shown: R v Gagnon, 2006 SCC 17, paras 10-11, [2006] 1 SCR 621; R v Demedeiros, 2018 ABCA 241, paras 5-7, 74 Alta LR (6th) 1; aff’d 2019 SCC 11, 431 DLR (4th) 647. An appellate court should show great deference to the findings of credi......
-
R v Osman,
...convicted; it is not the role of an appellate court to reweigh the evidence and retry the case: Cabrera, paras 22, 29; R v Demedeiros, 2018 ABCA 241, para 5, 74 Alta LR (6th) 1, aff’d 2019 SCC 11, [2019] 1 SCR 568. Whether a verdict is reasonable is a question of law; whether a witness is c......
Request a trial to view additional results
33 cases
-
R v Delmas, 2020 ABCA 152
...to deference unless palpable and overriding error can be shown: R v Gagnon, 2006 SCC 17, paras 10-11, [2006] 1 SCR 621; R v Demedeiros, 2018 ABCA 241, paras 5-7, 74 Alta LR (6th) 1; aff’d 2019 SCC 11, 431 DLR (4th) 647. An appellate court should show great deference to the findings of credi......
-
R v Osman,
...convicted; it is not the role of an appellate court to reweigh the evidence and retry the case: Cabrera, paras 22, 29; R v Demedeiros, 2018 ABCA 241, para 5, 74 Alta LR (6th) 1, aff’d 2019 SCC 11, [2019] 1 SCR 568. Whether a verdict is reasonable is a question of law; whether a witness is c......
-
R. v. J.R.G, 2020 ONSC 841
...consent, the live issue on this hearing. [27] The DNA evidence met the general conditions for confirmatory evidence: R. v. Demedeiros, 2018 ABCA 241, 364 C.C.C. (3d) 271 at paras. 8-13, aff’d 2019 SCC 11; R. v. Khela, at paras. 39-42. The evidence was independent of the complainant. It conf......
-
R v Morin-Poitras,
...is not the function of an appeal; it is not the role of an appellate court to reweigh the evidence and retry the case: R v Demedeiros, 2018 ABCA 241, para 5, 364 CCC (3d) 271, aff'd 2019 SCC 11, [2019] 1 SCR 568; R v Sidhu, 2021 ABCA 56, paras 28-29, [2021] AJ No 188 [8] &#x......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Rules Relating to the Use of Admissible Evidence
...Statements.” 20 Zou , above note 18 at paras 40–43. See also R v Qhasimy , 2018 ABCA 228 at paras 9–11. See also R v Demedeiros , 2018 ABCA 241 at para 89, aff’d [2019] 1 SCR 568. And see R v Magno , 2015 ONCA 111 at paras 42–43 [ Magno ]. 21 With respect to terminology, the Ontario Court o......
-
Table of cases
...OF EVIDENCE 722 R v Delorme, 2005 NWTSC 34 ...................................................................326, 331 R v Demedeiros, 2018 ABCA 241, aff’d [2019] 1 SCR 568 ................................. 675 R v Demeter, [1978] 1 SCR 538 ........................................................