R. v. Demedeiros, 2019 SCC 11
| Judge | Moldaver, Michael J.; Gascon, Clément; Brown, Russell; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Case Date | February 14, 2019 |
| Jurisdiction | Canada (Federal) |
| Citations | 2019 SCC 11 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
29 practice notes
-
R v Mela,
...does not mean it is actually an error when the entire context is considered: R v Quartey, 2018 SCC 59, [2018] 3 SCR 687; R v Demedeiros, 2019 SCC 11, [2019] 1 SCR 568; R v Delmas, 2020 SCC 39, [2020] SCJ No 39 (QL); R v Langan, 2020 SCC 33, [2020] SCJ No 33 (QL); R v Kishayinew, 2020 SCC 34......
-
R v Delmas, 2020 ABCA 152
...can be shown: R v Gagnon, 2006 SCC 17, paras 10-11, [2006] 1 SCR 621; R v Demedeiros, 2018 ABCA 241, paras 5-7, 74 Alta LR (6th) 1; aff’d 2019 SCC 11, 431 DLR (4th) 647. An appellate court should show great deference to the findings of credibility made at trial, although it remains open to ......
-
R v Osman,
...court to reweigh the evidence and retry the case: Cabrera, paras 22, 29; R v Demedeiros, 2018 ABCA 241, para 5, 74 Alta LR (6th) 1, aff’d 2019 SCC 11, [2019] 1 SCR 568. Whether a verdict is reasonable is a question of law; whether a witness is credible is a question of fact. An appellate co......
-
R. v. J.R.G, 2020 ONSC 841
...evidence met the general conditions for confirmatory evidence: R. v. Demedeiros, 2018 ABCA 241, 364 C.C.C. (3d) 271 at paras. 8-13, aff’d 2019 SCC 11; R. v. Khela, at paras. 39-42. The evidence was independent of the complainant. It confirmed a material, indeed a key part, of the complainan......
Request a trial to view additional results
27 cases
-
R v Mela,
...does not mean it is actually an error when the entire context is considered: R v Quartey, 2018 SCC 59, [2018] 3 SCR 687; R v Demedeiros, 2019 SCC 11, [2019] 1 SCR 568; R v Delmas, 2020 SCC 39, [2020] SCJ No 39 (QL); R v Langan, 2020 SCC 33, [2020] SCJ No 33 (QL); R v Kishayinew, 2020 SCC 34......
-
R v Delmas, 2020 ABCA 152
...can be shown: R v Gagnon, 2006 SCC 17, paras 10-11, [2006] 1 SCR 621; R v Demedeiros, 2018 ABCA 241, paras 5-7, 74 Alta LR (6th) 1; aff’d 2019 SCC 11, 431 DLR (4th) 647. An appellate court should show great deference to the findings of credibility made at trial, although it remains open to ......
-
R v Osman,
...court to reweigh the evidence and retry the case: Cabrera, paras 22, 29; R v Demedeiros, 2018 ABCA 241, para 5, 74 Alta LR (6th) 1, aff’d 2019 SCC 11, [2019] 1 SCR 568. Whether a verdict is reasonable is a question of law; whether a witness is credible is a question of fact. An appellate co......
-
R. v. J.R.G, 2020 ONSC 841
...evidence met the general conditions for confirmatory evidence: R. v. Demedeiros, 2018 ABCA 241, 364 C.C.C. (3d) 271 at paras. 8-13, aff’d 2019 SCC 11; R. v. Khela, at paras. 39-42. The evidence was independent of the complainant. It confirmed a material, indeed a key part, of the complainan......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Finds Federal Impact Assessment Act Unconstitutional
...Thornton Ltd, 2019 SCC 5; Reference re Environmental Management Act, 2021 SCC 1; and References re Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act, 2019 SCC 11. About BLG The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about ......