R v Devloo, 2020 MBCA 3

JudgeMadam Justice Diana M. Cameron; Madam Justice Jennifer A. Pfuetzner; Madam Justice Lori T. Spivak
CourtCourt of Appeal (Manitoba)
Case DateJanuary 14, 2020
JurisdictionManitoba
Citations2020 MBCA 3
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • R. v. Vallières, 2022 SCC 10
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 31 Marzo 2022
    ...ONCA 754, 140 O.R. (3d) 309; R. v. Angelis, 2016 ONCA 675, 133 O.R. (3d) 575; R. v. Ford, 2013 NBCA 63, 412 N.B.R. (2d) 196; R. v. Devloo, 2020 MBCA 3, 384 C.C.C. (3d) 288; R. v. Banayos and Banayos, 2018 MBCA 86, 365 C.C.C. (3d) 528; Quebec (Attorney General) v. Laroche, 2002 SCC 72, [2002......
  • R v Mela,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 3 Febrero 2021
    ...No 38918); R v Gallant, 2019 BCCA 193 at paras 31-33, 378 CCC (3d) 361, leave denied [2020] SCCA 124 (QL) (SCC No 39159) and R v Devloo, 2020 MBCA 3 at para 16, 384 CCC (3d) [37] More locally on this topic are R v Church, 2017 ABCA 421 at paras 15-19, [2017] AJ No 1349 (QL) and R v Hornby, ......
  • R. v. Chandi,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 9 Noviembre 2020
    ...the shooting, the reference to s. 21(2) does not constitute reversible error. Similar to the approach taken in R. v. Devloo, 2020 MBCA 3 at paras. 82–86, the invocation of s. 21(2), rather than 21(1), is akin to the judge misspeaking and did not prejudice the appellant......
  • R v McIvor,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • 28 Mayo 2021
    ...disclose an actual mistake” and “the errors (must be) readily obvious” (at para 53).   (See also R v Devloo, 2020 MBCA 3 at para 64; and R v Kionke, 2020 MBCA 32 at paras The Parties’ Positions [21]        &#......
4 cases
  • R. v. Vallières, 2022 SCC 10
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 31 Marzo 2022
    ...ONCA 754, 140 O.R. (3d) 309; R. v. Angelis, 2016 ONCA 675, 133 O.R. (3d) 575; R. v. Ford, 2013 NBCA 63, 412 N.B.R. (2d) 196; R. v. Devloo, 2020 MBCA 3, 384 C.C.C. (3d) 288; R. v. Banayos and Banayos, 2018 MBCA 86, 365 C.C.C. (3d) 528; Quebec (Attorney General) v. Laroche, 2002 SCC 72, [2002......
  • R v Mela,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 3 Febrero 2021
    ...No 38918); R v Gallant, 2019 BCCA 193 at paras 31-33, 378 CCC (3d) 361, leave denied [2020] SCCA 124 (QL) (SCC No 39159) and R v Devloo, 2020 MBCA 3 at para 16, 384 CCC (3d) [37] More locally on this topic are R v Church, 2017 ABCA 421 at paras 15-19, [2017] AJ No 1349 (QL) and R v Hornby, ......
  • R. v. Chandi,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 9 Noviembre 2020
    ...the shooting, the reference to s. 21(2) does not constitute reversible error. Similar to the approach taken in R. v. Devloo, 2020 MBCA 3 at paras. 82–86, the invocation of s. 21(2), rather than 21(1), is akin to the judge misspeaking and did not prejudice the appellant......
  • R v McIvor,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • 28 Mayo 2021
    ...disclose an actual mistake” and “the errors (must be) readily obvious” (at para 53).   (See also R v Devloo, 2020 MBCA 3 at para 64; and R v Kionke, 2020 MBCA 32 at paras The Parties’ Positions [21]        &#......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT