R v DG, 2019 ABCA 96
| Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice J.D. Bruce McDonald; The Honourable Madam Justice Frederica Schutz; The Honourable Madam Justice Dawn Pentelechuk |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Case Date | March 14, 2019 |
| Jurisdiction | Alberta |
| Citations | 2019 ABCA 96 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 practice notes
-
R v Gauthier,
...recitation of the test in analyzing the evidence. The question is whether the analytic process is evident in the reasoning: R v DG, 2019 ABCA 96, para 6, 375 CCC (3d) [23] A trial judge’s assessment of credibility is a finding of fact afforde......
-
R v Bennett,
...the Crown has proven their case beyond a reasonable doubt, shifts the burden of proof and thus contravenes the principles of W(D): R v DG, 2019 ABCA 96. [19] A related concept flowing from W(D), and one that I am mindful of, is that the trial is not a credibility contest requiring me to dec......
-
R v Candaele,
...the Crown has proven their case beyond a reasonable doubt, shifts the burden of proof and thus contravenes the principles of W(D): R v DG, 2019 ABCA 96. [18] A related concept flowing from W(D) is that the trial is not a credibility contest requirin......
-
R. v. Noseworthy (Complaint of T.D.), 2019 NLPC 0819A00001
...[1] R. v. Lifchus, 1997 CanLII 319 (SCC), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 320 [2] R. v. Starr, 2000 SCC 40 (CanLII), [2000] 2 S.C.R. 144 [3] R. v. DG, 2019 ABCA 96 (CanLII) [4] R. v. Kennedy, 2015 NLCA 14 (CanLII) [5] [1991] 1 S.C.R. 742 [6] R. v Best, 2016 NLCA 10, at para 7. [7] 2019 ABCA 36 (CanLII) [8]......
Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
-
R v Gauthier,
...recitation of the test in analyzing the evidence. The question is whether the analytic process is evident in the reasoning: R v DG, 2019 ABCA 96, para 6, 375 CCC (3d) [23] A trial judge’s assessment of credibility is a finding of fact afforde......
-
R v Bennett,
...the Crown has proven their case beyond a reasonable doubt, shifts the burden of proof and thus contravenes the principles of W(D): R v DG, 2019 ABCA 96. [19] A related concept flowing from W(D), and one that I am mindful of, is that the trial is not a credibility contest requiring me to dec......
-
R v Candaele,
...the Crown has proven their case beyond a reasonable doubt, shifts the burden of proof and thus contravenes the principles of W(D): R v DG, 2019 ABCA 96. [18] A related concept flowing from W(D) is that the trial is not a credibility contest requirin......
-
R. v. Noseworthy (Complaint of T.D.), 2019 NLPC 0819A00001
...[1] R. v. Lifchus, 1997 CanLII 319 (SCC), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 320 [2] R. v. Starr, 2000 SCC 40 (CanLII), [2000] 2 S.C.R. 144 [3] R. v. DG, 2019 ABCA 96 (CanLII) [4] R. v. Kennedy, 2015 NLCA 14 (CanLII) [5] [1991] 1 S.C.R. 742 [6] R. v Best, 2016 NLCA 10, at para 7. [7] 2019 ABCA 36 (CanLII) [8]......
Request a trial to view additional results