R. v. Dineley

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
JudgeMcLachlin, Beverley; LeBel, Louis; Deschamps, Marie; Fish, Morris J.; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Rothstein, Marshall; Cromwell, Thomas Albert
Citation2012 SCC 58,[2012] 3 SCR 272,353 DLR (4th) 236,[2012] EXP 3885,AZ-50908039,[2012] SCJ No 58 (QL),[2012] ACS no 58,290 CCC (3d) 190,JE 2012-2080
Date02 November 2012
Docket Number33640

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
115 practice notes
  • R. v. Chouhan
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • June 25, 2021
    ...Applied: R. v. Find, 2001 SCC 32 , [2001] 1 S.C.R. 863 ; R. v. Barton, 2019 SCC 33 ; R. v. Dineley, 2012 SCC 58 , [2012] 3 S.C.R. 272; considered: R. v. Sherratt, [1991] 1 S.C.R. 509 ; R. v. Kokopenace, 2015 SCC 28 , [2015] 2 S.C.R. 398 ; referred to: Cloutier v. The Queen, [1979] 2......
  • R. v. Carriere (D.M.)
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • October 30, 2013
    ...(R.D.) (1994), 123 Sask.R. 106 ; 74 W.A.C. 106; 91 C.C.C.(3d) 541 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 47, footnote 6]. R. v. Dineley (S.), [2012] 3 S.C.R. 272; 436 N.R. 59 ; 297 O.A.C. 50 ; 2012 SCC 58 , refd to. [para. West v. Gwynne, [1911] 2 Ch. 1 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 56]. Lewis v. Lewis, [......
  • R. v. Archambault
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • November 1, 2024
    ...The new s. 535 of the Criminal Code should be analyzed based on the approach articulated and applied in R. v. Dineley, 2012 SCC 58 , [2012] 3 S.C.R. 272, the Court’s most recent authority concerning the temporal application of legislation which affects substantive interests. Dineley makes ......
  • R. v. Albashir
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • November 19, 2021
    ...Reference re Remuneration of Judges of the Provincial Court of Prince Edward Island, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 3; R. v. Dineley, 2012 SCC 58, [2012] 3 S.C.R. 272; Gustavson Drilling (1964) Ltd. v. Minister of National Revenue, [1977] 1 S.C.R. 271; Tran v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedn......
  • Get Started for Free
90 cases
  • R. v. K.R.J.
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • July 21, 2016
    ...Cases Cited By Karakatsanis J. Discussed: R. v. Rodgers, 2006 SCC 15, [2006] 1 S.C.R. 554; referred to: R. v. Dineley, 2012 SCC 58, [2012] 3 S.C.R. 272; R. v. Wigglesworth, [1987] 2 S.C.R. 541; Black‑Clawson International Ltd. v. Papierwerke Waldhof‑Aschaffenburg A.G., [1975] A.C. 591; R. v......
  • R. v. Poulin
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • October 11, 2019
    ...[1993] 2 S.C.R. 880; R. v. Kelly, [1992] 2 S.C.R. 170; R. v. Hooyer, 2016 ONCA 44, 129 O.R. (3d) 81; R. v. Dineley, 2012 SCC 58, [2012] 3 S.C.R. 272; Brosseau v. Alberta Securities Commission, [1989] 1 S.C.R. 301; R. v. Bengy, 2015 ONCA 397, 325 C.C.C. (3d) 22; Reference re ss. 193 and 195.......
  • R. v. Albashir
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • November 19, 2021
    ...Reference re Remuneration of Judges of the Provincial Court of Prince Edward Island, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 3; R. v. Dineley, 2012 SCC 58, [2012] 3 S.C.R. 272; Gustavson Drilling (1964) Ltd. v. Minister of National Revenue, [1977] 1 S.C.R. 271; Tran v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedn......
  • R. v. Chouhan
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • June 25, 2021
    ...Applied: R. v. Find, 2001 SCC 32 , [2001] 1 S.C.R. 863 ; R. v. Barton, 2019 SCC 33 ; R. v. Dineley, 2012 SCC 58 , [2012] 3 S.C.R. 272; considered: R. v. Sherratt, [1991] 1 S.C.R. 509 ; R. v. Kokopenace, 2015 SCC 28 , [2015] 2 S.C.R. 398 ; referred to: Cloutier v. The Queen, [1979] 2......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (September 18 – September 22, 2017)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • September 29, 2017
    ...pending and future cases because such legislation does not affect the "substance" of the relevant rights: R. v. Dineley, 2012 SCC 58, [2012] 3 S.C.R. 272, at para 10. In Dineley, the Supreme Court emphasized that this presumption of immediate application does not apply to "procedural legisl......
16 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive The Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Fifth Edition
    • August 29, 2013
    ...116 ................... 292 R v DeSousa, [1992] 2 SCR 944, 95 DLR (4th) 595............................................ 278 R v Dineley, [2012] 3 SCR 272, 2012 SCC 58 ..................................................... 310 R v Downey, [1992] 2 SCR 10, 90 DLR (4th) 449 ..........................
  • Rights in the Criminal Process
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive The Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Seventh Edition
    • June 30, 2021
    ...pathway to conviction. As the presumption of 181 R v St-Onge Lamoureux , 2012 SCC 57, [2012] 3 SCR 187. 182 R v Dineley , 2012 SCC 58, [2012] 3 SCR 272. 183 R v Morrison , 2019 SCC 15, [2019] 2 SCR 3. THE CH ARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS 350 belief in age had been struck down, the result was......
  • Table of cases, index and about the authors
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive The Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Seventh Edition
    • June 30, 2021
    ...486 R v DeSousa, [1992] 2 SCR 944, 95 DLR (4th) 595............................................. 313 R v Dineley, [2012] 3 SCR 272, 2012 SCC 58...................................................... 349 R v Downey, [1992] 2 SCR 10, 90 DLR (4th) 449..................................................
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive The Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Sixth Edition
    • June 22, 2017
    ...312 R v DeSousa, [1992] 2 SCR 944, 95 DLR (4th) 595 ............................................ 298 R v Dineley, [2012] 3 SCR 272, 2012 SCC 58 ..................................................... 333 R v Downey, [1992] 2 SCR 10, 90 DLR (4th) 449 .................................................
  • Get Started for Free