R v Dodgson and Holloway,

JurisdictionAlberta
JudgeNixon
Citation2023 ABQB 106
Docket Number200638674Q1
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Date24 February 2023
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
2 practice notes
  • R v Jago,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 26 de agosto de 2024
    ...of denunciation and deterrence, as well as the protection of the public are paramount: Laberge at paras 23-25; R v Dodgson and Holloway, 2023 ABQB 106 at para 234. Denunciation and deterrence are also given primary consideration when the offence is committed against a person who is vulnerab......
  • R v Holloway,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 20 de setembro de 2024
    ...of fact the jury must have made to convict the appellant as they did. Those findings included the following ( R v Dodgson and Holloway, 2023 ABQB 106 at paras 198 and 203-204): I have already found that the use of violence was discussed including the use [of] a knife and that specifically t......
2 cases
  • R v Jago,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 26 de agosto de 2024
    ...of denunciation and deterrence, as well as the protection of the public are paramount: Laberge at paras 23-25; R v Dodgson and Holloway, 2023 ABQB 106 at para 234. Denunciation and deterrence are also given primary consideration when the offence is committed against a person who is vulnerab......
  • R v Holloway,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 20 de setembro de 2024
    ...of fact the jury must have made to convict the appellant as they did. Those findings included the following ( R v Dodgson and Holloway, 2023 ABQB 106 at paras 198 and 203-204): I have already found that the use of violence was discussed including the use [of] a knife and that specifically t......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT