R v Dodgson and Holloway
| Jurisdiction | Alberta |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Judge | Nixon |
| Citation | 2023 ABQB 106 |
| Date | 24 February 2023 |
| Docket Number | 200638674Q1 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
5 practice notes
-
R v Boucher,
...for profit and the killing did not happen in the victims home. These are significant distinguishing factors. 61 R v Dodgson and Holloway, 2023 ABQB 106 [ Dodgson and Holloway], affirmed separately by the Court of Appeal for Alberta, is a decision of the now Associate Chief Justice Blair Nix......
-
R v Kemp,
...unusual concern for the accused's future dangerousness and characterized the act as impulsive and senseless. 84 R v Dodgson and Holloway, 2023 ABQB 106 – Parole ineligibility period of 12 years imposed. The accused (Dodgson) and his co-accused lured the victim from his business so that they......
-
R v Jago,
...of denunciation and deterrence, as well as the protection of the public are paramount: Laberge at paras 23-25; R v Dodgson and Holloway, 2023 ABQB 106 at para 234. Denunciation and deterrence are also given primary consideration when the offence is committed against a person who is vulnerab......
-
R v Van Huigenbos,
...the court, said the culpability of an aider would be less than that of the principal offender. Similarly, in R v Dodgson and Holloway, 2023 ABQB 106, Justice Nixon, as he then was, found that aider/abettor culpability would be less than that of the principal offender. While both Moreira and......
Get Started for Free
5 cases
-
R v Boucher
...for profit and the killing did not happen in the victims home. These are significant distinguishing factors. 61 R v Dodgson and Holloway, 2023 ABQB 106 [ Dodgson and Holloway], affirmed separately by the Court of Appeal for Alberta, is a decision of the now Associate Chief Justice Blair Nix......
-
R v Kemp
...unusual concern for the accused's future dangerousness and characterized the act as impulsive and senseless. 84 R v Dodgson and Holloway, 2023 ABQB 106 – Parole ineligibility period of 12 years imposed. The accused (Dodgson) and his co-accused lured the victim from his business so that they......
-
R v Jago
...of denunciation and deterrence, as well as the protection of the public are paramount: Laberge at paras 23-25; R v Dodgson and Holloway, 2023 ABQB 106 at para 234. Denunciation and deterrence are also given primary consideration when the offence is committed against a person who is vulnerab......
-
R v Van Huigenbos
...the court, said the culpability of an aider would be less than that of the principal offender. Similarly, in R v Dodgson and Holloway, 2023 ABQB 106, Justice Nixon, as he then was, found that aider/abettor culpability would be less than that of the principal offender. While both Moreira and......
Get Started for Free