R. v. Domanski, (1979) 1 Man.R.(2d) 77 (CoCt)
Court | Provincial Court of Manitoba (Canada) |
Case Date | July 20, 1979 |
Jurisdiction | Manitoba |
Citations | (1979), 1 Man.R.(2d) 77 (CoCt) |
R. v. Domanski (1979), 1 Man.R.(2d) 77 (CoCt)
MLB headnote and full text
R. v. Domanski
Indexed As: R. v. Domanski
Manitoba County Court
Ferg, C.C.J.
July 20, 1979.
Summary:
This headnote contains no summary.
Criminal Law - Topic 1374
Motor vehicle - Impaired driving - Breathalyzer - Certificate evidence of results of analysis of breath sample - Correction or explanation of deficient certificate by testimony - Criminal Code of Canada, R.S.C. 1970, c. C-34, s. 237(1)(c) - A technician's breathalyzer certificate stated the times of the two tests by the international system instead of the usual a.m.-p.m. system - The trial judge refused to accept testimony to explain the times stated in the certificate - The Manitoba County Court allowed the Crown's appeal from the acquittal of the accused and ordered a new trial - The County Court held that the trial judge should have admitted testimony by the breathalyzer technician to explain the stated times in the certificate - See paragraphs 10 to 16.
Criminal Law - Topic 7634
Appeals - New trials - Power of appeal court to dispose of charge without new trial - Criminal Code of Canada, R.S.C. 1970, c. C-34, s. 613 - The Manitoba County Court held that as a general rule a court of appeal should order a new trial, where the trial judge improperly rejected evidence of the Crown - See paragraphs 17 to 18.
Evidence - Topic 2275
Judicial notice - Time - The Manitoba County Court held that the court could not take judicial notice of the equivalent a.m.-p.m. times of times stated in the international system - See paragraphs 6 to 8.
Comment:
See also R. v. Hrynkiw (1979), 1 Man.R.(2d) 71 and R. v. Erlendson (1979), 1 Man.R.(2d) 84.
Cases Noticed:
R. v. Dub, [1972] 3 C.C.C. 487, refd to. [para. 6].
R. v. Maybee, [1972] 3 W.W.R. 633 (Man. C.A.), refd to. [para. 6].
Statutes Noticed:
Criminal Code of Canada, R.S.C. 1970, c. C-34, sect. 237(1)(c), sect. 613 [para. 17].
Authors and Works Noticed:
Salhany, Canadian Criminal Procedure (2nd Ed.), ch. 9, p. 253 [para. 17].
Counsel:
A. Berg, for the respondent;
A.G. Bowering, for the Crown.
This case was heard before FERG, C.C.J., of the Manitoba County Court, who delivered the following judgment on July 20, 1979:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
R. v. Capowski, (1982) 39 A.R. 494 (QB)
...426; 54 C.C.C.(2d) 398, refd to. [para. 2]. R. v. Berehula (1980), 6 Sask.R. 181 (Sask. D.C.), refd to. [para. 2]. R. v. Domanski (1979), 1 Man.R.(2d) 77; 50 C.C.C.(2d) 226 (Man. C.C.), refd to. [para. R. v. Aitkinhead (1980), 8 Man.R.(2d) 395 (Man. C.C.), refd to. [para. 2]. R. v. Cote, [1......
-
R. v. Earle, (1981) 8 Man.R.(2d) 380 (CoCt)
...Andrushko (1977), 37 C.C.C.(2d) 273, refd to. [para. 8]. R. v. Hyrnkiw (1979), 1 Man.R.(2d) 71, refd to. [para. 12]. R. v. Domanski (1979), 1 Man.R.(2d) 77, refd to. [para. R. v. Erlendson (1979), 1 Man.R.(2d) 84, refd to. [para. 12]. R. v. Bykowski (1980), 23 A.R. 426; 54 C.C.C.(2d) 398, r......
-
R. v. Aitkenhead, (1980) 8 Man.R.(2d) 395 (CoCt)
...of time is sufficiently known that a court can take judicial notice of it - See paragraphs 14 and 15. Cases Noticed: R. v. Domanski (1979), 1 Man.R.(2d) 77, dist. [para. R. v. Erlendson (1979), 1 Man.R.(2d) 84, dist. [para. 7]. R. v. Kemp, 4 Weekly Criminal Bulletin 139, consd. [para. 13]. ......
-
R. v. Erlendson, (1979) 1 Man.R.(2d) 84 (CoCt)
...555; 32 C.C.C.(2d) 58; 40 C.R.N.S. 19, appld. [para. 8]. R. v. Hrynkiw (1979), 1 Man.R.(2d) 71, appld. [para. 10]. R. v. Domanski (1979), 1 Man.R.(2d) 77, appld. [para. Attorney General of Canada v. Workman, [1974] 6 W.W.R. 750; 19 C.C.C.(2d) 373, refd to. [para. 17]. Statutes Noticed: Crim......
-
R. v. Capowski, (1982) 39 A.R. 494 (QB)
...426; 54 C.C.C.(2d) 398, refd to. [para. 2]. R. v. Berehula (1980), 6 Sask.R. 181 (Sask. D.C.), refd to. [para. 2]. R. v. Domanski (1979), 1 Man.R.(2d) 77; 50 C.C.C.(2d) 226 (Man. C.C.), refd to. [para. R. v. Aitkinhead (1980), 8 Man.R.(2d) 395 (Man. C.C.), refd to. [para. 2]. R. v. Cote, [1......
-
R. v. Earle, (1981) 8 Man.R.(2d) 380 (CoCt)
...Andrushko (1977), 37 C.C.C.(2d) 273, refd to. [para. 8]. R. v. Hyrnkiw (1979), 1 Man.R.(2d) 71, refd to. [para. 12]. R. v. Domanski (1979), 1 Man.R.(2d) 77, refd to. [para. R. v. Erlendson (1979), 1 Man.R.(2d) 84, refd to. [para. 12]. R. v. Bykowski (1980), 23 A.R. 426; 54 C.C.C.(2d) 398, r......
-
R. v. Aitkenhead, (1980) 8 Man.R.(2d) 395 (CoCt)
...of time is sufficiently known that a court can take judicial notice of it - See paragraphs 14 and 15. Cases Noticed: R. v. Domanski (1979), 1 Man.R.(2d) 77, dist. [para. R. v. Erlendson (1979), 1 Man.R.(2d) 84, dist. [para. 7]. R. v. Kemp, 4 Weekly Criminal Bulletin 139, consd. [para. 13]. ......
-
R. v. Erlendson, (1979) 1 Man.R.(2d) 84 (CoCt)
...555; 32 C.C.C.(2d) 58; 40 C.R.N.S. 19, appld. [para. 8]. R. v. Hrynkiw (1979), 1 Man.R.(2d) 71, appld. [para. 10]. R. v. Domanski (1979), 1 Man.R.(2d) 77, appld. [para. Attorney General of Canada v. Workman, [1974] 6 W.W.R. 750; 19 C.C.C.(2d) 373, refd to. [para. 17]. Statutes Noticed: Crim......